印刷和摄影中的纪念碑:19世纪墨西哥的古代遗迹

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 0 ART Getty Research Journal Pub Date : 2017-01-01 DOI:10.1086/691296
Robert J. Kett
{"title":"印刷和摄影中的纪念碑:19世纪墨西哥的古代遗迹","authors":"Robert J. Kett","doi":"10.1086/691296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article considers printmaking and photography as media of inscription in late nineteenth-century Mexican archaeology. Specifically, it analyzes a debate about the relative virtues of drawn and photographic archaeological images between the Mexican polymath Antonio Peñafiel (1830–1922) and the British and French-American explorers Alice Dixon Le Plongeon (1851–1910) and Augustus Le Plongeon (1826–1908). Peñafiel, tasked with assembling comprehensive documentation of Mexico’s patrimony, found the constructed image of the print an ideal venue for demonstrating national scientific accomplishment, while the Le Plongeons celebrated the apparent presence and documentary holism afforded by photography. However, despite contentious epistemic debates about how scientists should navigate an unsettled ecology of nineteenth-century reproductive media, archival materials in the GRI collections reveal these scholars’ practices to be thoroughly intermedial. This article argues for further attention to local cultures of archaeological knowledge- and image-making as well as a complication of the frequently coupled historiographies of nineteenth-century archaeology and photography.","PeriodicalId":41510,"journal":{"name":"Getty Research Journal","volume":"9 1","pages":"201 - 210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/691296","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monuments in Print and Photography: Inscribing the Ancient in Nineteenth-Century Mexico\",\"authors\":\"Robert J. Kett\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/691296\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article considers printmaking and photography as media of inscription in late nineteenth-century Mexican archaeology. Specifically, it analyzes a debate about the relative virtues of drawn and photographic archaeological images between the Mexican polymath Antonio Peñafiel (1830–1922) and the British and French-American explorers Alice Dixon Le Plongeon (1851–1910) and Augustus Le Plongeon (1826–1908). Peñafiel, tasked with assembling comprehensive documentation of Mexico’s patrimony, found the constructed image of the print an ideal venue for demonstrating national scientific accomplishment, while the Le Plongeons celebrated the apparent presence and documentary holism afforded by photography. However, despite contentious epistemic debates about how scientists should navigate an unsettled ecology of nineteenth-century reproductive media, archival materials in the GRI collections reveal these scholars’ practices to be thoroughly intermedial. This article argues for further attention to local cultures of archaeological knowledge- and image-making as well as a complication of the frequently coupled historiographies of nineteenth-century archaeology and photography.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41510,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Getty Research Journal\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"201 - 210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/691296\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Getty Research Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/691296\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Getty Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/691296","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文认为版画和摄影是19世纪晚期墨西哥考古中的铭文媒介。具体而言,它分析了墨西哥博学家安东尼奥·佩尼亚菲尔(1830–1922)与英国和法裔美国探险家爱丽丝·迪克森·勒普朗贡(1851–1910)和奥古斯都·勒普朗根(1826–1908)之间关于绘画和摄影考古图像相对优点的争论。Peñafiel的任务是收集墨西哥遗产的全面文件,他发现印刷品的构造图像是展示国家科学成就的理想场所,而Le Plongeons则庆祝摄影的明显存在和纪录片的整体性。然而,尽管关于科学家应该如何驾驭19世纪不稳定的生殖媒体生态的认识论争论存在争议,但GRI收藏的档案材料表明,这些学者的做法完全是中间的。这篇文章主张进一步关注当地文化的考古知识和图像制作,以及19世纪考古和摄影史的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Monuments in Print and Photography: Inscribing the Ancient in Nineteenth-Century Mexico
This article considers printmaking and photography as media of inscription in late nineteenth-century Mexican archaeology. Specifically, it analyzes a debate about the relative virtues of drawn and photographic archaeological images between the Mexican polymath Antonio Peñafiel (1830–1922) and the British and French-American explorers Alice Dixon Le Plongeon (1851–1910) and Augustus Le Plongeon (1826–1908). Peñafiel, tasked with assembling comprehensive documentation of Mexico’s patrimony, found the constructed image of the print an ideal venue for demonstrating national scientific accomplishment, while the Le Plongeons celebrated the apparent presence and documentary holism afforded by photography. However, despite contentious epistemic debates about how scientists should navigate an unsettled ecology of nineteenth-century reproductive media, archival materials in the GRI collections reveal these scholars’ practices to be thoroughly intermedial. This article argues for further attention to local cultures of archaeological knowledge- and image-making as well as a complication of the frequently coupled historiographies of nineteenth-century archaeology and photography.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: The Getty Research Journal features the work of art historians, museum curators, and conservators around the world as part of the Getty’s mission to promote the presentation, conservation, and interpretation of the world''s artistic legacy. Articles present original scholarship related to the Getty’s collections, initiatives, and research. The journal is now available in a variety of digital formats: electronic issues are available on the JSTOR platform, and the e-Book Edition for iPad, iPhone, Kindle, Android, or computer is available for download.
期刊最新文献
“Quite Astonishing Fidelity?”: Verisimilitude and Obstruction in Jacques Joseph Tissot’s Thames Pictures The Body as Measure: Scale, Power, and Human Presence in Marc Ferrez’s Obras do novo abastecimento de água do Rio de Janeiro Jay DeFeo’s Dialectics of Painting Tracing Fannina Halle in El Lissitzky’s Letters Ancient Loom Weights at the J. Paul Getty Museum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1