一个充满平等和共同财产的透明世界的理念——通往灾难的途径

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Trusts & Trustees Pub Date : 2021-08-20 DOI:10.1093/tandt/ttab076
H. S. H. Prince Michael of Liechtenstein
{"title":"一个充满平等和共同财产的透明世界的理念——通往灾难的途径","authors":"H. S. H. Prince Michael of Liechtenstein","doi":"10.1093/tandt/ttab076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The idea of an overly idealized “sharing economy”, in which private property becomes a common good, is gaining power. The proponents seem to forget, that private property and clearly defined property rights are essential factors for the prospering development of society. This article illustrates how the world has got so far and why the idea of a transparent world full of equality and common property is a misleading effort.","PeriodicalId":43396,"journal":{"name":"Trusts & Trustees","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The idea of a transparent world full of equality and common property—a way to disaster\",\"authors\":\"H. S. H. Prince Michael of Liechtenstein\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/tandt/ttab076\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The idea of an overly idealized “sharing economy”, in which private property becomes a common good, is gaining power. The proponents seem to forget, that private property and clearly defined property rights are essential factors for the prospering development of society. This article illustrates how the world has got so far and why the idea of a transparent world full of equality and common property is a misleading effort.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trusts & Trustees\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab076\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trusts & Trustees","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/tandt/ttab076","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过度理想化的“共享经济”理念——私有财产成为一种公共利益——正变得越来越有影响力。支持者似乎忘记了私有财产和明确界定的产权是社会繁荣发展的必要因素。这篇文章说明了世界到目前为止是如何发展的,以及为什么一个充满平等和共同财产的透明世界的想法是一种误导性的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The idea of a transparent world full of equality and common property—a way to disaster
The idea of an overly idealized “sharing economy”, in which private property becomes a common good, is gaining power. The proponents seem to forget, that private property and clearly defined property rights are essential factors for the prospering development of society. This article illustrates how the world has got so far and why the idea of a transparent world full of equality and common property is a misleading effort.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
66.70%
发文量
92
期刊最新文献
CC14 guidance update: greener investments, greater uncertainty? Australian tax arrangements for trusts: Section 100A of the Income Tax Assessment Act (1936) Cth Fathers, daughters, and matters of trust In brief An analysis of the risks that arise for discretionary trust settlements in the event of a divorce: to what extent does the Family Court’s asset division approach undermine discretionary trusts?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1