对教育有效性研究的理论贡献:走向两难的方法

IF 1.8 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cambridge Journal of Education Pub Date : 2021-08-18 DOI:10.1080/0305764X.2021.1948971
Ariel Sarid
{"title":"对教育有效性研究的理论贡献:走向两难的方法","authors":"Ariel Sarid","doi":"10.1080/0305764X.2021.1948971","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The study of educational effectiveness has become increasingly complex. Alongside methodological advancements in the investigation and measurement of educational effectiveness, meta-analyses conducted by leading researchers have shown that the field has been suffering from a significant lack of theory or from a weak theoretical basis. The present paper seeks to address this gap by connecting the four models of organisational effectiveness incorporated in Quinn and Rohrbaugh’s framework of competing values to the four dualities of educational design that appear in Wenger’s theory of communities of practice. By doing so, the paper contributes theoretical insights towards the development of a dilemmatic approach to the study of educational effectiveness. Based on the theoretical insights offered here, the paper argues that effective educational organisations are those that are able to address successfully and on an ongoing basis paradoxical tensions and incorporate interrelated and yet contradictory elements of the educational process and school organisation.","PeriodicalId":47730,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Education","volume":"52 1","pages":"117 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theoretical contributions to the investigation of educational effectiveness: towards a dilemmatic approach\",\"authors\":\"Ariel Sarid\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0305764X.2021.1948971\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The study of educational effectiveness has become increasingly complex. Alongside methodological advancements in the investigation and measurement of educational effectiveness, meta-analyses conducted by leading researchers have shown that the field has been suffering from a significant lack of theory or from a weak theoretical basis. The present paper seeks to address this gap by connecting the four models of organisational effectiveness incorporated in Quinn and Rohrbaugh’s framework of competing values to the four dualities of educational design that appear in Wenger’s theory of communities of practice. By doing so, the paper contributes theoretical insights towards the development of a dilemmatic approach to the study of educational effectiveness. Based on the theoretical insights offered here, the paper argues that effective educational organisations are those that are able to address successfully and on an ongoing basis paradoxical tensions and incorporate interrelated and yet contradictory elements of the educational process and school organisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Journal of Education\",\"volume\":\"52 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 136\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Journal of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1948971\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764X.2021.1948971","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

教育有效性的研究变得越来越复杂。除了在调查和测量教育有效性方面的方法进步之外,由主要研究人员进行的荟萃分析表明,该领域一直受到理论严重缺乏或理论基础薄弱的困扰。本文试图通过将Quinn和Rohrbaugh的竞争价值框架中包含的四种组织有效性模型与温格的实践社区理论中出现的教育设计的四种二元性联系起来,来解决这一差距。通过这样做,本文为发展教育有效性研究的两难方法提供了理论见解。基于本文提供的理论见解,本文认为,有效的教育组织是那些能够成功地、持续地解决矛盾的紧张关系,并将教育过程和学校组织中相互关联但又相互矛盾的因素结合起来的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Theoretical contributions to the investigation of educational effectiveness: towards a dilemmatic approach
ABSTRACT The study of educational effectiveness has become increasingly complex. Alongside methodological advancements in the investigation and measurement of educational effectiveness, meta-analyses conducted by leading researchers have shown that the field has been suffering from a significant lack of theory or from a weak theoretical basis. The present paper seeks to address this gap by connecting the four models of organisational effectiveness incorporated in Quinn and Rohrbaugh’s framework of competing values to the four dualities of educational design that appear in Wenger’s theory of communities of practice. By doing so, the paper contributes theoretical insights towards the development of a dilemmatic approach to the study of educational effectiveness. Based on the theoretical insights offered here, the paper argues that effective educational organisations are those that are able to address successfully and on an ongoing basis paradoxical tensions and incorporate interrelated and yet contradictory elements of the educational process and school organisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cambridge Journal of Education
Cambridge Journal of Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Cambridge Journal of Education publishes original refereed articles on all aspects of education, with a particular emphasis on work that contributes to a shared understanding amongst academic researchers, theorists, practising teachers, policy-makers and educational administrators. The journal also welcomes the submission of systematic review articles that summarise and offer new insights into specific areas of educational concern. With a wide international readership, Cambridge Journal of Education publishes contributions drawn from different educational systems and cultures enabling continued in-depth discussion of global educational theory, policy and practice. The journal’s Special Issue programme encourages and stimulates focused discussion and engagement with significant themes and responses to topics raised by readers and contributors. Cambridge Journal of Education welcomes proposals for future editions.
期刊最新文献
Academisation, neoliberal technologies of governance and the rapid growth of multi-academy trusts (MATs) in England “Sometimes it feels like we are puppets, here to listen to but not speak”: listening to the voices of young Bangladeshi students about barriers to well-being at school Funds of courage: advancing social justice in children’s reading for pleasure Indigenous youth wellbeing in higher education: a systematic literature review of qualitative studies Adolescents’ and teachers’ experience of shared education: a small-scale qualitative study in Northern Ireland
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1