课堂最佳网络对教师成绩的影响:一项初步调查

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Early Intervention Pub Date : 2022-01-24 DOI:10.1177/10538151211067544
M. Conroy, K. Sutherland, K. Granger, Katerina M. Marcoulides, Edward G. Feil, J. Wright, Mayra Ramos, Alexandra Montesion
{"title":"课堂最佳网络对教师成绩的影响:一项初步调查","authors":"M. Conroy, K. Sutherland, K. Granger, Katerina M. Marcoulides, Edward G. Feil, J. Wright, Mayra Ramos, Alexandra Montesion","doi":"10.1177/10538151211067544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examined the effects of the BEST in CLASS intervention professional development component when delivered online in comparison with in person and a control group. A total of 29 early childhood teachers serving young children demonstrating challenging behaviors were included as participants. Data were collected on teachers’ classroom quality, self-efficacy, implementation of the BEST in CLASS practices, acceptability of the intervention, and costs of delivery. Positive outcomes on several dimensions of classroom quality were found for the BEST in CLASS–Web condition when compared with the BEST in CLASS and control conditions. Alternatively, teachers’ sense of self-efficacy was greater when BEST in CLASS was delivered in person when compared with teachers who received online delivery or those in the control condition. Finally, teachers in both treatment conditions increased their use of the practices in comparison with control teachers. Teachers in both treatment conditions rated BEST in CLASS with high levels of acceptability. Implications and future research directions are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47360,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Early Intervention","volume":"44 1","pages":"130 - 150"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of BEST in CLASS–Web on Teacher Outcomes: A Preliminary Investigation\",\"authors\":\"M. Conroy, K. Sutherland, K. Granger, Katerina M. Marcoulides, Edward G. Feil, J. Wright, Mayra Ramos, Alexandra Montesion\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10538151211067544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examined the effects of the BEST in CLASS intervention professional development component when delivered online in comparison with in person and a control group. A total of 29 early childhood teachers serving young children demonstrating challenging behaviors were included as participants. Data were collected on teachers’ classroom quality, self-efficacy, implementation of the BEST in CLASS practices, acceptability of the intervention, and costs of delivery. Positive outcomes on several dimensions of classroom quality were found for the BEST in CLASS–Web condition when compared with the BEST in CLASS and control conditions. Alternatively, teachers’ sense of self-efficacy was greater when BEST in CLASS was delivered in person when compared with teachers who received online delivery or those in the control condition. Finally, teachers in both treatment conditions increased their use of the practices in comparison with control teachers. Teachers in both treatment conditions rated BEST in CLASS with high levels of acceptability. Implications and future research directions are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47360,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Early Intervention\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"130 - 150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Early Intervention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211067544\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Early Intervention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151211067544","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究考察了BEST在课堂干预专业发展部分的效果,当在线交付时,与面对面和对照组进行比较。共有29名幼儿教师为表现出挑战性行为的幼儿服务。收集了教师课堂质量、自我效能感、BEST在课堂实践中的实施、干预的可接受性和实施成本等方面的数据。在课堂质量的几个维度上,与课堂质量和控制条件相比,在课堂质量的几个维度上,在课堂质量的几个维度上发现了积极的结果。另一方面,教师的自我效能感在课堂上进行最佳教学时比接受在线教学或对照组的教师更强。最后,与对照组教师相比,两种治疗条件下的教师都增加了对实践的使用。两种治疗条件下的教师都被评为班级最佳,接受度高。讨论了研究的意义和未来的研究方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effects of BEST in CLASS–Web on Teacher Outcomes: A Preliminary Investigation
This study examined the effects of the BEST in CLASS intervention professional development component when delivered online in comparison with in person and a control group. A total of 29 early childhood teachers serving young children demonstrating challenging behaviors were included as participants. Data were collected on teachers’ classroom quality, self-efficacy, implementation of the BEST in CLASS practices, acceptability of the intervention, and costs of delivery. Positive outcomes on several dimensions of classroom quality were found for the BEST in CLASS–Web condition when compared with the BEST in CLASS and control conditions. Alternatively, teachers’ sense of self-efficacy was greater when BEST in CLASS was delivered in person when compared with teachers who received online delivery or those in the control condition. Finally, teachers in both treatment conditions increased their use of the practices in comparison with control teachers. Teachers in both treatment conditions rated BEST in CLASS with high levels of acceptability. Implications and future research directions are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: The Journal of Early Intervention (JEI) publishes articles related to research and practice in early intervention for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Early intervention is defined broadly as procedures that facilitate the development of infants and young children who have special needs or who are at risk for developmental disabilities. The childhood years in which early intervention might occur begin at birth, or before birth for some prevention programs, and extend through the years in which children traditionally begin elementary school.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Caregivers’ Advocacy Efforts in Early Intervention Using Auto-Photography and Photo-Elicitation Interviews Authentic Assessment of Executive Functions in Early Childhood: A Scoping Review A Pilot Study of the Effectiveness and Feasibility of an Early Intervention Leadership Program for Families of Children With Disabilities Evaluating a Rapid Coaching Intervention Delivered Remotely to Families Tele-Intervention During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned From Early Intervention Practitioners
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1