种族灭绝:哲学、理论和乌克兰研究维度

Halyna Lozko
{"title":"种族灭绝:哲学、理论和乌克兰研究维度","authors":"Halyna Lozko","doi":"10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the main philosophical and theoretical problems of genocide in their dimensions as Ukrainian studies. In the era of global information and hybrid wars, the true meaning of many classic terms and ethnological concepts can be to a large extent distorted. Information about certain phenomena may be unavailable or misinterpreted by the world community, so there is an urgent need for their clarification and normalisation. The war crimes of the russian federation in Ukraine were recognised as genocide by seven countries, which is a very small number, and it is necessary to convey to the international community the importance of condemning these crimes on a global scale. The concept of genocide was introduced into legal practise and is most widely used in this field. However, we have certain \"white spots\" with ethnological, philosophical -theoretical, and Ukrainian studies definitions of concepts related to genocide, such as \"ethnocide\", \"linguicide\", especially \"deicide\", which is explained in this article for the first time. The destruction of national memory has been necessary for invaders at all times. The attention of Ukrainian scholars has already been focused on the fact that during the first pogrom (massacre) of Kyiv in 1169 by the Suzdal prince Andrey Bogolyubsky, the aggressors showed terrible signs of sadism against the people of Kyiv. For the first time, this showed the ethnic difference of the “Zalissia” Suzdalians from the Kyivan-Ruthenians, their antagonistic nature, which becomes clear in the context of the existential struggle of two separate nations. Further events of forced coexistence in one state of two nations, one of which did not lose its identity despite all the genocides, ruins, and calamities, were caused by imperial terror. They showed that Ukrainians have not learned the lessons of history, no conclusions have been drawn, and no state strategy for overcoming the Russian-imperial legacy has been developed. Attention was drawn to the fact that all phenomena of ethno-national conflict are important and should be targeted at overcoming the consequences of genocide in all its forms in the future.","PeriodicalId":52730,"journal":{"name":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Genocide: Philosophical, Theoretical, and Ukrainian Studies Dimensions\",\"authors\":\"Halyna Lozko\",\"doi\":\"10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article examines the main philosophical and theoretical problems of genocide in their dimensions as Ukrainian studies. In the era of global information and hybrid wars, the true meaning of many classic terms and ethnological concepts can be to a large extent distorted. Information about certain phenomena may be unavailable or misinterpreted by the world community, so there is an urgent need for their clarification and normalisation. The war crimes of the russian federation in Ukraine were recognised as genocide by seven countries, which is a very small number, and it is necessary to convey to the international community the importance of condemning these crimes on a global scale. The concept of genocide was introduced into legal practise and is most widely used in this field. However, we have certain \\\"white spots\\\" with ethnological, philosophical -theoretical, and Ukrainian studies definitions of concepts related to genocide, such as \\\"ethnocide\\\", \\\"linguicide\\\", especially \\\"deicide\\\", which is explained in this article for the first time. The destruction of national memory has been necessary for invaders at all times. The attention of Ukrainian scholars has already been focused on the fact that during the first pogrom (massacre) of Kyiv in 1169 by the Suzdal prince Andrey Bogolyubsky, the aggressors showed terrible signs of sadism against the people of Kyiv. For the first time, this showed the ethnic difference of the “Zalissia” Suzdalians from the Kyivan-Ruthenians, their antagonistic nature, which becomes clear in the context of the existential struggle of two separate nations. Further events of forced coexistence in one state of two nations, one of which did not lose its identity despite all the genocides, ruins, and calamities, were caused by imperial terror. They showed that Ukrainians have not learned the lessons of history, no conclusions have been drawn, and no state strategy for overcoming the Russian-imperial legacy has been developed. Attention was drawn to the fact that all phenomena of ethno-national conflict are important and should be targeted at overcoming the consequences of genocide in all its forms in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrayinoznavstvo\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrayinoznavstvo\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrayinoznavstvo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30840/2413-7065.1(86).2023.275330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从乌克兰研究的角度考察了种族灭绝的主要哲学和理论问题。在全球信息化和混合战争的时代,许多经典术语和民族学概念的真实含义可能在很大程度上被扭曲。关于某些现象的信息可能无法获得或被国际社会误解,因此迫切需要对其进行澄清和正常化。俄罗斯联邦在乌克兰的战争罪行被七个国家承认为种族灭绝,这是一个非常少的数字,有必要向国际社会传达在全球范围内谴责这些罪行的重要性。种族灭绝的概念被引入法律实践,并在这一领域得到最广泛的应用。然而,我们在民族学、哲学理论和乌克兰研究中对与种族灭绝有关的概念的定义有一些“白点”,例如“种族灭绝”、“语言灭绝”,特别是“决定灭绝”,这在本文中是第一次解释。在任何时候,侵略者都必须毁灭民族记忆。乌克兰学者的注意力已经集中在1169年苏兹达尔王子Andrey Bogolyubsky对基辅的第一次大屠杀期间,侵略者对基辅人民表现出可怕的虐待狂迹象。这第一次显示了“扎利西亚”苏兹达利人与基辅-鲁塞尼亚人的种族差异,他们的敌对性质,这在两个独立国家的生存斗争的背景下变得明显。在两个民族的一个国家被迫共存的进一步事件是由帝国恐怖造成的,尽管发生了所有的种族灭绝、废墟和灾难,其中一个国家并没有失去其特性。它们表明,乌克兰人没有吸取历史教训,没有得出任何结论,也没有制定出克服俄罗斯帝国遗产的国家战略。与会者提请注意,种族-民族冲突的所有现象都很重要,今后应以克服一切形式的种族灭绝的后果为目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Genocide: Philosophical, Theoretical, and Ukrainian Studies Dimensions
The article examines the main philosophical and theoretical problems of genocide in their dimensions as Ukrainian studies. In the era of global information and hybrid wars, the true meaning of many classic terms and ethnological concepts can be to a large extent distorted. Information about certain phenomena may be unavailable or misinterpreted by the world community, so there is an urgent need for their clarification and normalisation. The war crimes of the russian federation in Ukraine were recognised as genocide by seven countries, which is a very small number, and it is necessary to convey to the international community the importance of condemning these crimes on a global scale. The concept of genocide was introduced into legal practise and is most widely used in this field. However, we have certain "white spots" with ethnological, philosophical -theoretical, and Ukrainian studies definitions of concepts related to genocide, such as "ethnocide", "linguicide", especially "deicide", which is explained in this article for the first time. The destruction of national memory has been necessary for invaders at all times. The attention of Ukrainian scholars has already been focused on the fact that during the first pogrom (massacre) of Kyiv in 1169 by the Suzdal prince Andrey Bogolyubsky, the aggressors showed terrible signs of sadism against the people of Kyiv. For the first time, this showed the ethnic difference of the “Zalissia” Suzdalians from the Kyivan-Ruthenians, their antagonistic nature, which becomes clear in the context of the existential struggle of two separate nations. Further events of forced coexistence in one state of two nations, one of which did not lose its identity despite all the genocides, ruins, and calamities, were caused by imperial terror. They showed that Ukrainians have not learned the lessons of history, no conclusions have been drawn, and no state strategy for overcoming the Russian-imperial legacy has been developed. Attention was drawn to the fact that all phenomena of ethno-national conflict are important and should be targeted at overcoming the consequences of genocide in all its forms in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
审稿时长
7 weeks
期刊最新文献
Multidimensionality of the Institutionalization of the Values of the Ukrainian Ethnic Group Stages of the Formation of the Ukrainian People as a Local Manifestation of the Universal Ethnogenetic Processes of Europe Formation and Preservation of the Identity of Ukrainian Culture as a Factor of State Formation The Latest Study of the Civilization Identity of Ukrainiannеss Methodological Aspects of the Study of Worldview and Existential Dimensions and Archaic Stages of the Spiritual Genesis of the Ukrainian Ethnos
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1