O. Z. Rojs, A. Dovč, H. Hristov, M. Červek, B. Slavec, U. Krapež, Zoran Žlabravec, J. Răcnik, M. Zupan
{"title":"斯洛文尼亚商业层的福利评估","authors":"O. Z. Rojs, A. Dovč, H. Hristov, M. Červek, B. Slavec, U. Krapež, Zoran Žlabravec, J. Răcnik, M. Zupan","doi":"10.26873/svr-971-2020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here we present the first welfare assessment of commercial layers conducted in Slovenia. Hens were assessed in four systems at the beginning of the laying period at 22 to 24 weeks and at 50 to 55 weeks of age. These systems were an enriched battery cage system, an aviary, and a litter system with or without outdoor access. Clinical inspections of flocks were performed, and animal-based welfare indicators were scored (e.g., keel bone damage, feather condition, foot pad lesions, beak deformities, and comb and skin wounds). Hens’ fear level was scored using the novel object test and avoidance distance test. Among resource-based measures, selected micro-climate parameters were measured. The results showed no obvious clinical signs related to infectious diseases and suggest that the selected climate conditions were satisfying in all systems. Among animal-based welfare indicators, keel bone damage was shown to be the most serious problem connected with hens’ age and housing systems ( p < 0.05). Enriched cages and aviary system were associated with significantly more keel deformities compared to the litter systems ( p < 0.05). In addition, the least prevalence of foot pad dermatitis together with better feather condition was observed in the litter systems. In the family-owned aviary facility, hens were found to be the most motivated to approach a novel object or a human, and as such were recognized as the least fearful birds, with better human–animal interaction compared to other intensive housing systems. Key words: laying hens; welfare; health; housing system OCENA DOBROBITI V INTENZIVNIH REJAH KOKOSI NESNIC V SLOVENIJI Povzetek: Opravili smo prvo celovito oceno dobrobiti kokosi nesnic v Sloveniji. V raziskavo smo vkljucili nesnice iz stirih razlicnih sistemov reje in raven dobrobiti ocenili v dveh starostnih obdobjih; na zacetku nesnosti, v starosti od 22 do 24 tednov in pri 50 do 55 tednih. Nesnice so bile rejene v obogatenih kletkah, v voljerah, v talni reji brez možnosti izpusta in v talni reji z možnostjo izpusta. Ob vsakem ocenjevanju smo jate klinicno pregledali in s pregledom posameznih živali ocenili specificne indikatorje dobrega pocutja (poskodbe prsnice, operjenost, poskodbe podplatnih blazinic, deformacije kljuna in poskodbe grebena ter kože). Plasnost kot indikator socialnega obnasanja smo ocenili s testom novega predmeta in s testom odmika od cloveka. Spremljali smo tudi mikro-klimatske pogoje reje. Ves cas spremljanja nismo ugotovili vidnih klinicnih znakov kužnih obolenj. Rezultati meritev mikro-klimatskih parametrov nakazujejo, da so bili pogoji v rejah dobri. Poskodba prsnice se je izmed specificnih kazalnikov izkazala za najresnejsi problem, na katerega vplivata tako starost kot sistem reje ( p < 0,05). Poskodbe prsnice so bile znacilno bolj izražene pri kokosih iz obogatenih kletk in voljer ( p < 0,05) v primerjavi z nesnicami iz talnih rej. Kokosi iz talnih sistemov so bile tudi boljse operjene in so imele nižjo prevalenco poskodb na podplatnih blazinicah. Nesnice, ki so bile rejene v voljerah na družinski kmetiji, so kazale najvec zanimanja za nove predmete in cloveka. Te kokosi so bile ocenjene kot najmanj plasne in so izražale boljso interakcijo clovek–žival kot kokosi iz drugih primerjanih sistemov. Kljucne besede: kokosi nesnice; dobrobit; zdravje; sistem reje","PeriodicalId":21765,"journal":{"name":"Slovenian Veterinary Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"WELFARE ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL LAYERS IN SLOVENIA\",\"authors\":\"O. Z. Rojs, A. Dovč, H. Hristov, M. Červek, B. Slavec, U. Krapež, Zoran Žlabravec, J. Răcnik, M. Zupan\",\"doi\":\"10.26873/svr-971-2020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here we present the first welfare assessment of commercial layers conducted in Slovenia. Hens were assessed in four systems at the beginning of the laying period at 22 to 24 weeks and at 50 to 55 weeks of age. These systems were an enriched battery cage system, an aviary, and a litter system with or without outdoor access. Clinical inspections of flocks were performed, and animal-based welfare indicators were scored (e.g., keel bone damage, feather condition, foot pad lesions, beak deformities, and comb and skin wounds). Hens’ fear level was scored using the novel object test and avoidance distance test. Among resource-based measures, selected micro-climate parameters were measured. The results showed no obvious clinical signs related to infectious diseases and suggest that the selected climate conditions were satisfying in all systems. Among animal-based welfare indicators, keel bone damage was shown to be the most serious problem connected with hens’ age and housing systems ( p < 0.05). Enriched cages and aviary system were associated with significantly more keel deformities compared to the litter systems ( p < 0.05). In addition, the least prevalence of foot pad dermatitis together with better feather condition was observed in the litter systems. In the family-owned aviary facility, hens were found to be the most motivated to approach a novel object or a human, and as such were recognized as the least fearful birds, with better human–animal interaction compared to other intensive housing systems. Key words: laying hens; welfare; health; housing system OCENA DOBROBITI V INTENZIVNIH REJAH KOKOSI NESNIC V SLOVENIJI Povzetek: Opravili smo prvo celovito oceno dobrobiti kokosi nesnic v Sloveniji. V raziskavo smo vkljucili nesnice iz stirih razlicnih sistemov reje in raven dobrobiti ocenili v dveh starostnih obdobjih; na zacetku nesnosti, v starosti od 22 do 24 tednov in pri 50 do 55 tednih. Nesnice so bile rejene v obogatenih kletkah, v voljerah, v talni reji brez možnosti izpusta in v talni reji z možnostjo izpusta. Ob vsakem ocenjevanju smo jate klinicno pregledali in s pregledom posameznih živali ocenili specificne indikatorje dobrega pocutja (poskodbe prsnice, operjenost, poskodbe podplatnih blazinic, deformacije kljuna in poskodbe grebena ter kože). Plasnost kot indikator socialnega obnasanja smo ocenili s testom novega predmeta in s testom odmika od cloveka. Spremljali smo tudi mikro-klimatske pogoje reje. Ves cas spremljanja nismo ugotovili vidnih klinicnih znakov kužnih obolenj. Rezultati meritev mikro-klimatskih parametrov nakazujejo, da so bili pogoji v rejah dobri. Poskodba prsnice se je izmed specificnih kazalnikov izkazala za najresnejsi problem, na katerega vplivata tako starost kot sistem reje ( p < 0,05). Poskodbe prsnice so bile znacilno bolj izražene pri kokosih iz obogatenih kletk in voljer ( p < 0,05) v primerjavi z nesnicami iz talnih rej. Kokosi iz talnih sistemov so bile tudi boljse operjene in so imele nižjo prevalenco poskodb na podplatnih blazinicah. Nesnice, ki so bile rejene v voljerah na družinski kmetiji, so kazale najvec zanimanja za nove predmete in cloveka. Te kokosi so bile ocenjene kot najmanj plasne in so izražale boljso interakcijo clovek–žival kot kokosi iz drugih primerjanih sistemov. Kljucne besede: kokosi nesnice; dobrobit; zdravje; sistem reje\",\"PeriodicalId\":21765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Slovenian Veterinary Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Slovenian Veterinary Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26873/svr-971-2020\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Slovenian Veterinary Research","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26873/svr-971-2020","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这里,我们提出了在斯洛文尼亚进行的商业层的第一个福利评估。在蛋鸡产蛋初期(22 ~ 24周龄)和50 ~ 55周龄(50 ~ 55周龄)分4个体系进行评估。这些系统是一个强化的电池笼系统,一个鸟舍和一个有或没有室外通道的垃圾系统。对鸡群进行临床检查,并对动物福利指标进行评分(例如,龙骨损伤、羽毛状况、脚垫病变、喙畸形、鸡冠和皮肤伤口)。采用新对象测试和回避距离测试对母鸡的恐惧程度进行评分。在基于资源的措施中,测量了选定的小气候参数。结果表明,各系统所选气候条件均令人满意。在动物福利指标中,蛋鸡的龙骨损伤与鸡龄和鸡舍制度有关(p < 0.05)。强化笼和鸟舍系统的龙骨畸形显著高于废砂系统(p < 0.05)。此外,在凋落物系统中,脚垫皮炎的患病率最低,羽毛状况较好。在家庭拥有的鸟舍设施中,母鸡被发现是最有动力接近新物体或人类的,因此被认为是最不害怕的鸟类,与其他密集的住房系统相比,人与动物的互动更好。关键词:蛋鸡;福利;健康;住宅系统:OCENA DOBROBITI V INTENZIVNIH REJAH KOKOSI NESNIC V SLOVENIJI Povzetek: Opravili smo provo celovito oceno DOBROBITI KOKOSI NESNIC V SLOVENIJIV . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo, V . raziskavo;Na zacetku nesnosti, v starosti od 22 do 24 tetenov in pri 50 do 55 tetenih。nenice so bile rejene v obogatenih kletkah, v voljerah, v talni reji brez možnosti izpusta in v talni reji z možnostjo izpusta。Ob vsakem ocenjevanju smo jate klinicno pregledali in s pregledom posameznih živali ocenili特异性indickatorje dobrega pocuja(可能是price, operjenost,可能是podplatnih blazinic, deformacije kljuna in可能是grebena ter kože)。血浆酶标物(pplnost - kot)指标社会基因(socialnega obnasanja smo - seni)、睾丸激素(novega - premeta)、睾丸激素(odmika - cloveka)。Spremljali smo - tui microklimatske pogoje reje。2 .请注意,我们的工作人员是如何做到这一点的?Rezultati meritev - microklimatskih parameter - nakazujejo, da so bili pogoji v . Rezultati dobri。Poskodba prisje - izalnikov izkazala za najresnejsi问题,na katerega vplivata tako starost kot系统拒绝(p < 0.05)。可能存在的prisme,因此znacilno bolj izražene pri kokosih iz obogatenih kletk in voljer (p < 0.05) v primerjavi z nesnicami iz talnih rej。科科西博士说,他的研究表明,在这种情况下,研究人员可能会发现,在这种情况下,可能会有一种疾病的发生。Nesnice, ki so bile rejene v voljerah na družinski kmetiji, so kazale najvec zanimanja za nove premete in cloveka。该kokosi是如此的新cenjene kot najmanj飞机在所以izražale boljso interakcijo clovek -žival kokosi是药物primerjanih sistemov。kljune beede: kokosi nesnice;dobrobit;zdravje;sistem reje
WELFARE ASSESSMENT OF COMMERCIAL LAYERS IN SLOVENIA
Here we present the first welfare assessment of commercial layers conducted in Slovenia. Hens were assessed in four systems at the beginning of the laying period at 22 to 24 weeks and at 50 to 55 weeks of age. These systems were an enriched battery cage system, an aviary, and a litter system with or without outdoor access. Clinical inspections of flocks were performed, and animal-based welfare indicators were scored (e.g., keel bone damage, feather condition, foot pad lesions, beak deformities, and comb and skin wounds). Hens’ fear level was scored using the novel object test and avoidance distance test. Among resource-based measures, selected micro-climate parameters were measured. The results showed no obvious clinical signs related to infectious diseases and suggest that the selected climate conditions were satisfying in all systems. Among animal-based welfare indicators, keel bone damage was shown to be the most serious problem connected with hens’ age and housing systems ( p < 0.05). Enriched cages and aviary system were associated with significantly more keel deformities compared to the litter systems ( p < 0.05). In addition, the least prevalence of foot pad dermatitis together with better feather condition was observed in the litter systems. In the family-owned aviary facility, hens were found to be the most motivated to approach a novel object or a human, and as such were recognized as the least fearful birds, with better human–animal interaction compared to other intensive housing systems. Key words: laying hens; welfare; health; housing system OCENA DOBROBITI V INTENZIVNIH REJAH KOKOSI NESNIC V SLOVENIJI Povzetek: Opravili smo prvo celovito oceno dobrobiti kokosi nesnic v Sloveniji. V raziskavo smo vkljucili nesnice iz stirih razlicnih sistemov reje in raven dobrobiti ocenili v dveh starostnih obdobjih; na zacetku nesnosti, v starosti od 22 do 24 tednov in pri 50 do 55 tednih. Nesnice so bile rejene v obogatenih kletkah, v voljerah, v talni reji brez možnosti izpusta in v talni reji z možnostjo izpusta. Ob vsakem ocenjevanju smo jate klinicno pregledali in s pregledom posameznih živali ocenili specificne indikatorje dobrega pocutja (poskodbe prsnice, operjenost, poskodbe podplatnih blazinic, deformacije kljuna in poskodbe grebena ter kože). Plasnost kot indikator socialnega obnasanja smo ocenili s testom novega predmeta in s testom odmika od cloveka. Spremljali smo tudi mikro-klimatske pogoje reje. Ves cas spremljanja nismo ugotovili vidnih klinicnih znakov kužnih obolenj. Rezultati meritev mikro-klimatskih parametrov nakazujejo, da so bili pogoji v rejah dobri. Poskodba prsnice se je izmed specificnih kazalnikov izkazala za najresnejsi problem, na katerega vplivata tako starost kot sistem reje ( p < 0,05). Poskodbe prsnice so bile znacilno bolj izražene pri kokosih iz obogatenih kletk in voljer ( p < 0,05) v primerjavi z nesnicami iz talnih rej. Kokosi iz talnih sistemov so bile tudi boljse operjene in so imele nižjo prevalenco poskodb na podplatnih blazinicah. Nesnice, ki so bile rejene v voljerah na družinski kmetiji, so kazale najvec zanimanja za nove predmete in cloveka. Te kokosi so bile ocenjene kot najmanj plasne in so izražale boljso interakcijo clovek–žival kot kokosi iz drugih primerjanih sistemov. Kljucne besede: kokosi nesnice; dobrobit; zdravje; sistem reje
期刊介绍:
SLOVENIAN VETERINARY RESEARCH (ISSN 1580-4003) publishes original articles, which report the results of original research in most areas of biomedicine. The journal also publishes review articles dealing with rapidly developing areas of biomedicine or which update understanding of classical fields of biomedicine, as well as case reports, shorter scientific contributions, letters to the editor, etc.; which have not been published or are under consideration for publication elsewhere. Only papers written in English can be considered.