宗教教育批判

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH British Journal of Religious Education Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798
Yonah H. Matemba
{"title":"宗教教育批判","authors":"Yonah H. Matemba","doi":"10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As Religious Education (RE) in public schools repositions to remain educationally relevant for children in an increasingly secularised and post-truth world, the need to engage critically with complex issues (agreeable and the disagreeable) cannot be greater, even in non-public faith-based contexts such as Sunday School or Madrassa. The juxtaposition of different (at times conflicting) knowledge in the material content of contemporary RE, variety of pedagogical approaches and, crucially, how classroom discourse (involving students and teachers) at times de/legitimises certain knowledge, calls for critique (not criticism) as the basis for doing RE. While criticism focuses on fault-finding, disapproval, and ‘othering’, on the other hand, critique relates to skilful conceptualisation, considered judgement, detailed analysis, and reflective assessment of issues, whether religious or not. Critique draws from Critical Theory, involving dialectical thinking and is helpful because it facilitates a critical assessment of and challenge to hegemony, dominant culture, and ideology of the curriculum. In RE, critique is aligned with Critical Religious Education (CRE) initially developed by Andrew Wright mainly dealing with truth claims (Wright 2007). In its rather evolved form, what makes CRE useful is how it can help learners engage with truth claims whether inside or outside religious belief, including how the approach can be put into practice in classroom discourse (Franck 2015; Goodman 2018). Critique in RE does not require suspending one’s faith (for those with one) nor provide, carte blanche, space to attack religious beliefs or non-religious stances for that matter. Rather, while it deals with disagreement – after all disagreements are part of life (Flensner and Von der Lippe 2019), it fosters critical dialogue informed by an exchange of relevant information, contradictory feelings, and nuanced perspectives (O’Grady and Jackson 2020). Reading the various articles selected for this volume, I find myself re-appraising the value of critique in RE to appreciate fully their significance in the context in which they have been raised. From Sweden, Ebba Henrekson takes a historical-policy perspective in surveying the existence of independent of confessional schools and highlighting – to the contemporary reader – that these schools are neither new nor a growing problem. This point, according to her, is worth raising to dispel the media-fuelled fear of Muslim independent confessional schools as potential cause of social problems that can lead to ‘segregation, intolerance, extremism, and religious fundamentalism’ belying the fact that historically in Sweden, Christian independent schools have always deviated from values existing in public schools. By highlighting the trajectory of Swedish independent schools, Henrekson takes a critical stance in arguing that public negative attention placed on fewer (Muslim) independent public schools is unfounded and hugely problematic for a pluralist society Sweden has become. Based on phenomenological reflections, the use of critique to address complex notions of truth in RE is evident in Brendan Hyde’s and David Kennedy’s articles. Writing from Australia, Hyde explores how, by working with community children in the Godly Playroom, truth as Alethia (‘unforgetting’) can be explored in Sunday school RE (drawing on Jerome Berryman’s work). According to Hyde Godly play involves the re/telling of Bible stories ‘. . . to show how truth is gradually disclosed through the telling of the parable’. From a critical stance, Godly play involves a dialectical process involving repeated interaction between showing and hiding of the truth expressed through ‘disclosure, concealment, withdrawal and reflection’. The creative process involved in the dialogical engagement encourages children to engage with their learning in a meaningful and reflective way. Through critical reflection, Hyde BRITISH JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 2023, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 309–312 https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798","PeriodicalId":46368,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Religious Education","volume":"45 1","pages":"309 - 312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critique in Religious Education\",\"authors\":\"Yonah H. Matemba\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As Religious Education (RE) in public schools repositions to remain educationally relevant for children in an increasingly secularised and post-truth world, the need to engage critically with complex issues (agreeable and the disagreeable) cannot be greater, even in non-public faith-based contexts such as Sunday School or Madrassa. The juxtaposition of different (at times conflicting) knowledge in the material content of contemporary RE, variety of pedagogical approaches and, crucially, how classroom discourse (involving students and teachers) at times de/legitimises certain knowledge, calls for critique (not criticism) as the basis for doing RE. While criticism focuses on fault-finding, disapproval, and ‘othering’, on the other hand, critique relates to skilful conceptualisation, considered judgement, detailed analysis, and reflective assessment of issues, whether religious or not. Critique draws from Critical Theory, involving dialectical thinking and is helpful because it facilitates a critical assessment of and challenge to hegemony, dominant culture, and ideology of the curriculum. In RE, critique is aligned with Critical Religious Education (CRE) initially developed by Andrew Wright mainly dealing with truth claims (Wright 2007). In its rather evolved form, what makes CRE useful is how it can help learners engage with truth claims whether inside or outside religious belief, including how the approach can be put into practice in classroom discourse (Franck 2015; Goodman 2018). Critique in RE does not require suspending one’s faith (for those with one) nor provide, carte blanche, space to attack religious beliefs or non-religious stances for that matter. Rather, while it deals with disagreement – after all disagreements are part of life (Flensner and Von der Lippe 2019), it fosters critical dialogue informed by an exchange of relevant information, contradictory feelings, and nuanced perspectives (O’Grady and Jackson 2020). Reading the various articles selected for this volume, I find myself re-appraising the value of critique in RE to appreciate fully their significance in the context in which they have been raised. From Sweden, Ebba Henrekson takes a historical-policy perspective in surveying the existence of independent of confessional schools and highlighting – to the contemporary reader – that these schools are neither new nor a growing problem. This point, according to her, is worth raising to dispel the media-fuelled fear of Muslim independent confessional schools as potential cause of social problems that can lead to ‘segregation, intolerance, extremism, and religious fundamentalism’ belying the fact that historically in Sweden, Christian independent schools have always deviated from values existing in public schools. By highlighting the trajectory of Swedish independent schools, Henrekson takes a critical stance in arguing that public negative attention placed on fewer (Muslim) independent public schools is unfounded and hugely problematic for a pluralist society Sweden has become. Based on phenomenological reflections, the use of critique to address complex notions of truth in RE is evident in Brendan Hyde’s and David Kennedy’s articles. Writing from Australia, Hyde explores how, by working with community children in the Godly Playroom, truth as Alethia (‘unforgetting’) can be explored in Sunday school RE (drawing on Jerome Berryman’s work). According to Hyde Godly play involves the re/telling of Bible stories ‘. . . to show how truth is gradually disclosed through the telling of the parable’. From a critical stance, Godly play involves a dialectical process involving repeated interaction between showing and hiding of the truth expressed through ‘disclosure, concealment, withdrawal and reflection’. The creative process involved in the dialogical engagement encourages children to engage with their learning in a meaningful and reflective way. Through critical reflection, Hyde BRITISH JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 2023, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 309–312 https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798\",\"PeriodicalId\":46368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"309 - 312\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Religious Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Religious Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着公立学校的宗教教育(RE)在日益世俗化和后真理世界中重新定位,以保持对儿童的教育相关性,批判性地参与复杂问题(同意和不同意)的需求不能更大,即使在非公共信仰背景下,如主日学校或马德拉萨。当代可再生能源材料内容中不同(有时相互冲突)知识的并置,各种教学方法,以及至关重要的是,课堂话语(涉及学生和教师)有时如何使某些知识合法化,需要批评(而不是批评)作为进行可再生能源的基础。批评侧重于寻找缺点,不赞成和“他者”,另一方面,批评涉及到熟练的概念化,经过考虑的判断,详细的分析,以及对问题的反思性评估,无论宗教与否。批判源自批判理论,涉及辩证思维,有助于对课程的霸权、主导文化和意识形态进行批判性评估和挑战。在RE中,批判与最初由Andrew Wright开发的批判宗教教育(CRE)一致,主要处理真理主张(Wright 2007)。在其相当进化的形式中,使CRE有用的是它如何帮助学习者参与宗教信仰内部或外部的真理主张,包括如何将这种方法应用于课堂话语(Franck 2015;古德曼2018)。RE中的批判并不需要暂停一个人的信仰(对于那些有信仰的人),也不提供全权委托的空间来攻击宗教信仰或非宗教立场。相反,虽然它处理分歧——毕竟分歧是生活的一部分(Flensner and Von der Lippe 2019),但它通过交换相关信息、矛盾的感受和微妙的观点(O’grady and Jackson 2020),促进了批判性对话。阅读为本卷选择的各种文章,我发现自己重新评估了可重构中批判的价值,以充分理解它们在提出它们的背景下的重要性。来自瑞典的Ebba Henrekson从历史政策的角度考察了独立教派学校的存在,并向当代读者强调,这些学校既不是新出现的,也不是一个日益严重的问题。根据她的说法,这一点值得提出,以消除媒体对穆斯林独立忏悔学校的恐惧,因为它可能导致社会问题,导致“隔离,不宽容,极端主义和宗教原教旨主义”,掩盖了历史上在瑞典,基督教独立学校总是偏离公立学校存在的价值观的事实。通过强调瑞典独立学校的发展轨迹,Henrekson采取了一种批判的立场,认为公众对少数(穆斯林)独立公立学校的负面关注是没有根据的,而且对于瑞典已经成为一个多元化社会来说,这是一个巨大的问题。基于现象学的反思,在Brendan Hyde和David Kennedy的文章中,使用批判来解决RE中复杂的真理概念是显而易见的。海德在澳大利亚的文章中探讨了如何通过与敬虔游戏室的社区儿童一起工作,在主日学校RE(借鉴杰罗姆·贝里曼的作品)中探索真理作为Alethia(“难忘”)。根据海德的说法,敬虔的游戏包括讲述圣经故事……通过寓言的讲述来展示真理是如何逐渐被揭示的。从批判的角度来看,敬虔的游戏包含了一个辩证的过程,涉及通过“揭露、隐藏、退缩和反思”表达的真理的展示和隐藏之间的反复互动。对话参与的创造性过程鼓励儿童以有意义和反思的方式参与他们的学习。《海德英国宗教教育杂志》2023年第45卷第1期。4,309 - 312 https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critique in Religious Education
As Religious Education (RE) in public schools repositions to remain educationally relevant for children in an increasingly secularised and post-truth world, the need to engage critically with complex issues (agreeable and the disagreeable) cannot be greater, even in non-public faith-based contexts such as Sunday School or Madrassa. The juxtaposition of different (at times conflicting) knowledge in the material content of contemporary RE, variety of pedagogical approaches and, crucially, how classroom discourse (involving students and teachers) at times de/legitimises certain knowledge, calls for critique (not criticism) as the basis for doing RE. While criticism focuses on fault-finding, disapproval, and ‘othering’, on the other hand, critique relates to skilful conceptualisation, considered judgement, detailed analysis, and reflective assessment of issues, whether religious or not. Critique draws from Critical Theory, involving dialectical thinking and is helpful because it facilitates a critical assessment of and challenge to hegemony, dominant culture, and ideology of the curriculum. In RE, critique is aligned with Critical Religious Education (CRE) initially developed by Andrew Wright mainly dealing with truth claims (Wright 2007). In its rather evolved form, what makes CRE useful is how it can help learners engage with truth claims whether inside or outside religious belief, including how the approach can be put into practice in classroom discourse (Franck 2015; Goodman 2018). Critique in RE does not require suspending one’s faith (for those with one) nor provide, carte blanche, space to attack religious beliefs or non-religious stances for that matter. Rather, while it deals with disagreement – after all disagreements are part of life (Flensner and Von der Lippe 2019), it fosters critical dialogue informed by an exchange of relevant information, contradictory feelings, and nuanced perspectives (O’Grady and Jackson 2020). Reading the various articles selected for this volume, I find myself re-appraising the value of critique in RE to appreciate fully their significance in the context in which they have been raised. From Sweden, Ebba Henrekson takes a historical-policy perspective in surveying the existence of independent of confessional schools and highlighting – to the contemporary reader – that these schools are neither new nor a growing problem. This point, according to her, is worth raising to dispel the media-fuelled fear of Muslim independent confessional schools as potential cause of social problems that can lead to ‘segregation, intolerance, extremism, and religious fundamentalism’ belying the fact that historically in Sweden, Christian independent schools have always deviated from values existing in public schools. By highlighting the trajectory of Swedish independent schools, Henrekson takes a critical stance in arguing that public negative attention placed on fewer (Muslim) independent public schools is unfounded and hugely problematic for a pluralist society Sweden has become. Based on phenomenological reflections, the use of critique to address complex notions of truth in RE is evident in Brendan Hyde’s and David Kennedy’s articles. Writing from Australia, Hyde explores how, by working with community children in the Godly Playroom, truth as Alethia (‘unforgetting’) can be explored in Sunday school RE (drawing on Jerome Berryman’s work). According to Hyde Godly play involves the re/telling of Bible stories ‘. . . to show how truth is gradually disclosed through the telling of the parable’. From a critical stance, Godly play involves a dialectical process involving repeated interaction between showing and hiding of the truth expressed through ‘disclosure, concealment, withdrawal and reflection’. The creative process involved in the dialogical engagement encourages children to engage with their learning in a meaningful and reflective way. Through critical reflection, Hyde BRITISH JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS EDUCATION 2023, VOL. 45, NO. 4, 309–312 https://doi.org/10.1080/01416200.2023.2244798
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Religious Education (BJRE) is an international peer-reviewed journal which has a pedigree stretching back to 1934 when it began life as Religion in Education. In 1961 the title was changed to Learning for Living, and the present title was adopted in 1978. It is the leading journal in Britain for the dissemination of international research in religion and education and for the scholarly discussion of issues concerning religion and education internationally. The British Journal of Religious Education promotes research which contributes to our understanding of the relationship between religion and education in all phases of formal and non-formal educational settings. BJRE publishes articles which are national, international and transnational in scope from researchers working in any discipline whose work informs debate in religious education. Topics might include religious education policy curriculum and pedagogy, research on religion and young people, or the influence of religion(s) and non-religious worldviews upon the educational process as a whole.
期刊最新文献
Genders, sexualities, and Catholic schools: towards a theological anthropology of adolescent flourishing Analyzing Pakistan’s national curriculum textbooks in religious-based construction and demonisation of ‘other’ for high schools Cultivating a just habitus through intercultural wisdom of women Struggling for relevance: exploring editors’ perceived importance and value of religious education in school Rear-mirror view: representation of Islam and Muslims in the RE textbooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1