社会科学教科书中的视觉结构是否表现出性别刻板印象和偏见?来自印度的案例研究

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Gender and Education Pub Date : 2022-11-14 DOI:10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626
S. Košir, Radhika Lakshminarayanan
{"title":"社会科学教科书中的视觉结构是否表现出性别刻板印象和偏见?来自印度的案例研究","authors":"S. Košir, Radhika Lakshminarayanan","doi":"10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT India presents a heterogeneous socio-economic ethos, rooted within structures of patriarchy and caste, rendering any transformation of traditional gender roles, increasingly challenging. Gender socialisation begins in childhood and is assimilated through schools. Students imbibe gender concepts through textbooks and classroom experiences, which either reinforce their social perceptions or influence them to critique inequalities and bias. Adopting a multi-pronged approach through feminist critical discourse analysis (FCDA) and content analysis, this research evaluates the images used in Indian school social science textbooks, for constructs of gender representation, structures, and stereotyping. The research reveals that gender structures depicted in textbooks foster patriarchy and gender bias. There is minimal effort to depict feminist activism and little scope to foster gender reflexivity and social debate, which only sustains stereotypical perceptions of gender roles within Indian society.","PeriodicalId":12486,"journal":{"name":"Gender and Education","volume":"35 1","pages":"69 - 88"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do visual constructs in social science textbooks evince gender stereotypes and bias? A case study from India\",\"authors\":\"S. Košir, Radhika Lakshminarayanan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT India presents a heterogeneous socio-economic ethos, rooted within structures of patriarchy and caste, rendering any transformation of traditional gender roles, increasingly challenging. Gender socialisation begins in childhood and is assimilated through schools. Students imbibe gender concepts through textbooks and classroom experiences, which either reinforce their social perceptions or influence them to critique inequalities and bias. Adopting a multi-pronged approach through feminist critical discourse analysis (FCDA) and content analysis, this research evaluates the images used in Indian school social science textbooks, for constructs of gender representation, structures, and stereotyping. The research reveals that gender structures depicted in textbooks foster patriarchy and gender bias. There is minimal effort to depict feminist activism and little scope to foster gender reflexivity and social debate, which only sustains stereotypical perceptions of gender roles within Indian society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender and Education\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"69 - 88\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender and Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2022.2144626","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要:印度呈现出一种异质的社会经济精神,植根于父权制和种姓结构,这使得传统性别角色的任何转变都变得越来越具有挑战性。性别社会化始于儿童时期,并通过学校被同化。学生们通过课本和课堂体验吸收性别概念,这要么强化了他们的社会认知,要么影响他们批判不平等和偏见。本研究采用女权主义批评话语分析(FCDA)和内容分析的多管齐下的方法,评估了印度学校社会科学教科书中使用的图像,以构建性别代表、结构和刻板印象。研究表明,教科书中描述的性别结构助长了父权制和性别偏见。描绘女权主义激进主义的努力很少,促进性别反思和社会辩论的空间也很小,这只会维持印度社会对性别角色的刻板印象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do visual constructs in social science textbooks evince gender stereotypes and bias? A case study from India
ABSTRACT India presents a heterogeneous socio-economic ethos, rooted within structures of patriarchy and caste, rendering any transformation of traditional gender roles, increasingly challenging. Gender socialisation begins in childhood and is assimilated through schools. Students imbibe gender concepts through textbooks and classroom experiences, which either reinforce their social perceptions or influence them to critique inequalities and bias. Adopting a multi-pronged approach through feminist critical discourse analysis (FCDA) and content analysis, this research evaluates the images used in Indian school social science textbooks, for constructs of gender representation, structures, and stereotyping. The research reveals that gender structures depicted in textbooks foster patriarchy and gender bias. There is minimal effort to depict feminist activism and little scope to foster gender reflexivity and social debate, which only sustains stereotypical perceptions of gender roles within Indian society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender and Education
Gender and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: Gender and Education grew out of feminist politics and a social justice agenda and is committed to developing multi-disciplinary and critical discussions of gender and education. The journal is particularly interested in the place of gender in relation to other key differences and seeks to further feminist knowledge, philosophies, theory, action and debate. The Editors are actively committed to making the journal an interactive platform that includes global perspectives on education, gender and culture. Submissions to the journal should examine and theorize the interrelated experiences of gendered subjects including women, girls, men, boys, and gender-diverse individuals. Papers should consider how gender shapes and is shaped by other social, cultural, discursive, affective and material dimensions of difference. Gender and Education expects articles to engage in feminist debate, to draw upon a range of theoretical frameworks and to go beyond simple descriptions. Education is interpreted in a broad sense to cover both formal and informal aspects, including pre-school, primary, and secondary education; families and youth cultures inside and outside schools; adult, community, further and higher education; vocational education and training; media education; and parental education.
期刊最新文献
‘Day-dreaming’ school climate: a slow critical feminist post-humanist c/art/ographic listening to how school feels Collaboratively reimagining higher education: enacting posthuman feminist practices Intersectional cognitive schemas of diversity and inclusion in higher education ‘They trusted me, even if I’m a tom like this’: exploring sexual-professional identity communication of LGBTQ+ primary schoolteachers Artistic mutilation of genitalia: an interpretive analysis of representations of genitalia in Indian school science textbooks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1