三维打印模板矢状面脊柱畸形矫正棒弯曲精度评估

IF 0.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Archives of Neuroscience Pub Date : 2022-08-15 DOI:10.5812/ans-129307
Mohammad Javad Dehghani Firoozabadi, M. Zarei, B. Mirzashahi, M. Golbakhsh, Saeedreza Mehrpour Mohammadabadi, Abbas Rahimian, Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan
{"title":"三维打印模板矢状面脊柱畸形矫正棒弯曲精度评估","authors":"Mohammad Javad Dehghani Firoozabadi, M. Zarei, B. Mirzashahi, M. Golbakhsh, Saeedreza Mehrpour Mohammadabadi, Abbas Rahimian, Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan","doi":"10.5812/ans-129307","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: One of the most important objectives in the deformity correction surgery of spine is to achieve appropriate sagittal alignment, to improve patient outcome and reduce the risk of junctional failure. Intra-operative rod bending is crucial to achieve desired alignment. Objectives: Assessment of accuracy of rod bending by spine surgeons with or with-out template and/or correction. Methods: Spine surgeons were asked to bend two rods; one in-situ on three-dimensional (3D) printed moulage, designed based on schematic representation of a patient with Kyphoscoliosis, the other rod was asked to bend with correction angles. The differences were measured and correlated with experience and specialty. Results: 21 fellowship trained spine surgeons participated in this study, for in-situ rod, mean thoracic and lumbar bend were 65.2 (P = 0.033) and 49.3 (P = 0.077) degrees, respectively and for the correction rod, mean bend in thoracic and lumbar were 53.8 (P = 0.001) and 51.8 (P = 0.004) degrees, respectively, with significant difference from cut-off point. Each curve was over-bend and it was more pronounce in thoracic, both on in-situ and correction rods, 61.9 and 71.1 %, respectively. Level of experience showed positive correlation with degree of rod bending more than five years in thoracic in-situ bend (P = 0.003) and thoracic bend with correction (P = 0.004). Field of specialty showed positive correlation as well; with orthopedic in-situ bend (P = 0.002) and with correction (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Spine surgeons tend to over-bend rods, when given target angles and when correction is needed. However, when provided with template, a 3D printed moulage in our study, accuracy of rod bending improved significantly.","PeriodicalId":43970,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of Rod Bending Accuracy for Sagittal Spinal Deformity Correction on 3D Printed Moulage\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Javad Dehghani Firoozabadi, M. Zarei, B. Mirzashahi, M. Golbakhsh, Saeedreza Mehrpour Mohammadabadi, Abbas Rahimian, Furqan Mohammed Yaseen Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ans-129307\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: One of the most important objectives in the deformity correction surgery of spine is to achieve appropriate sagittal alignment, to improve patient outcome and reduce the risk of junctional failure. Intra-operative rod bending is crucial to achieve desired alignment. Objectives: Assessment of accuracy of rod bending by spine surgeons with or with-out template and/or correction. Methods: Spine surgeons were asked to bend two rods; one in-situ on three-dimensional (3D) printed moulage, designed based on schematic representation of a patient with Kyphoscoliosis, the other rod was asked to bend with correction angles. The differences were measured and correlated with experience and specialty. Results: 21 fellowship trained spine surgeons participated in this study, for in-situ rod, mean thoracic and lumbar bend were 65.2 (P = 0.033) and 49.3 (P = 0.077) degrees, respectively and for the correction rod, mean bend in thoracic and lumbar were 53.8 (P = 0.001) and 51.8 (P = 0.004) degrees, respectively, with significant difference from cut-off point. Each curve was over-bend and it was more pronounce in thoracic, both on in-situ and correction rods, 61.9 and 71.1 %, respectively. Level of experience showed positive correlation with degree of rod bending more than five years in thoracic in-situ bend (P = 0.003) and thoracic bend with correction (P = 0.004). Field of specialty showed positive correlation as well; with orthopedic in-situ bend (P = 0.002) and with correction (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Spine surgeons tend to over-bend rods, when given target angles and when correction is needed. However, when provided with template, a 3D printed moulage in our study, accuracy of rod bending improved significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-129307\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans-129307","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:脊柱畸形矫正手术中最重要的目标之一是实现适当的矢状位对齐,以改善患者的预后,降低关节衰竭的风险。术中棒弯曲是达到预期对齐的关键。目的:评估脊柱外科医生使用或不使用模板和/或矫正杆弯曲的准确性。方法:脊柱外科医生被要求弯曲两根棒;一根在三维(3D)打印模板上,根据后凸脊柱侧凸患者的示意图设计,另一根被要求以校正角度弯曲。测量了这些差异,并将其与经验和专业相关联。结果:21名接受过研究员培训的脊柱外科医生参加了本研究,原位棒的平均胸椎和腰椎弯曲度分别为65.2度(P = 0.033)和49.3度(P = 0.077),矫正棒的平均胸椎和腰椎弯曲度分别为53.8度(P = 0.001)和51.8度(P = 0.004),与截止点有显著性差异。在原位棒和矫正棒上,每条曲线均有过弯,且在胸部更明显,分别为61.9%和71.1%。经验水平与5年以上胸椎原位弯曲(P = 0.003)和胸椎矫正弯曲(P = 0.004)的弯曲程度呈正相关。专业领域也呈正相关;矫形原位弯曲(P = 0.002)和矫正(P = 0.003)。结论:当给定目标角度和需要矫正时,脊柱外科医生倾向于过度弯曲棒。然而,在我们的研究中,当提供模板时,3D打印模模,杆弯曲的精度显着提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of Rod Bending Accuracy for Sagittal Spinal Deformity Correction on 3D Printed Moulage
Background: One of the most important objectives in the deformity correction surgery of spine is to achieve appropriate sagittal alignment, to improve patient outcome and reduce the risk of junctional failure. Intra-operative rod bending is crucial to achieve desired alignment. Objectives: Assessment of accuracy of rod bending by spine surgeons with or with-out template and/or correction. Methods: Spine surgeons were asked to bend two rods; one in-situ on three-dimensional (3D) printed moulage, designed based on schematic representation of a patient with Kyphoscoliosis, the other rod was asked to bend with correction angles. The differences were measured and correlated with experience and specialty. Results: 21 fellowship trained spine surgeons participated in this study, for in-situ rod, mean thoracic and lumbar bend were 65.2 (P = 0.033) and 49.3 (P = 0.077) degrees, respectively and for the correction rod, mean bend in thoracic and lumbar were 53.8 (P = 0.001) and 51.8 (P = 0.004) degrees, respectively, with significant difference from cut-off point. Each curve was over-bend and it was more pronounce in thoracic, both on in-situ and correction rods, 61.9 and 71.1 %, respectively. Level of experience showed positive correlation with degree of rod bending more than five years in thoracic in-situ bend (P = 0.003) and thoracic bend with correction (P = 0.004). Field of specialty showed positive correlation as well; with orthopedic in-situ bend (P = 0.002) and with correction (P = 0.003). Conclusions: Spine surgeons tend to over-bend rods, when given target angles and when correction is needed. However, when provided with template, a 3D printed moulage in our study, accuracy of rod bending improved significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Neuroscience
Archives of Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Archives of neuroscience is a clinical and basic journal which is informative to all practitioners like Neurosurgeons, Neurologists, Psychiatrists, Neuroscientists. It is the official journal of Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center. The Major theme of this journal is to follow the path of scientific collaboration, spontaneity, and goodwill for the future, by providing up-to-date knowledge for the readers. The journal aims at covering different fields, as the name implies, ranging from research in basic and clinical sciences to core topics such as patient care, education, procuring and correct utilization of resources and bringing to limelight the cherished goals of the institute in providing a standard care for the physically disabled patients. This quarterly journal offers a venue for our researchers and scientists to vent their innovative and constructive research works. The scope of the journal is as far wide as the universe as being declared by the name of the journal, but our aim is to pursue our sacred goals in providing a panacea for the intractable ailments, which leave a psychological element in the daily life of such patients. This authoritative clinical and basic journal was founded by Professor Madjid Samii in 2012.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Propofol and Isoflurane on Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction Following Elective Laminectomy Surgery in Adult Elderly Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial Study Evaluation of the Prevalence and Predictive Factors of Post-COVID Cognitive Disorders Among Iranian COVID-19 Recuperated Individuals: A Bayesian Analysis Comparison of Ketamine to Haloperidol for Preventing Delirium in ICU Elderly Patients Posterior Reversible Encephalopathy Syndrome in a Hospitalized Pregnant Woman with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Case Report Facial and Cochlear Nerves Outcomes in the Surgical Resection of Giant Vestibular Schwannoma: Is There Any Predictive Value for Intraoperative Neuromonitoring of the Facial Nerve?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1