误解与员工权力动力学可能影响学生对图书馆资源的浏览

IF 0.4 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Evidence Based Library and Information Practice Pub Date : 2023-03-15 DOI:10.18438/eblip30287
M. Bridgeman
{"title":"误解与员工权力动力学可能影响学生对图书馆资源的浏览","authors":"M. Bridgeman","doi":"10.18438/eblip30287","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of:\nAlmeida, N., & Tidal, J. (2022). Library wayfinding and ESOL students: Communication challenges and empathy-based intervention. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(2), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0025  \nObjective – To map the experiences of students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) navigating an academic library.\nDesign – A wayfinding study to evaluate how students navigate a library.\nSetting – An urban-based academic library at an institution of higher education.\nSubjects – Students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL).\nMethods – A mixed methods study including visual recordings, web screen capture, interviews, and surveys. Subjects were recruited through email. Twelve participants were selected and given an initial screening survey. They were given four tasks to complete: Find a book in the stacks, find a book in the reserves, find a DVD in media, and find a database. They were equipped with a GoPro camera and were given a think-aloud protocol (TAP). They were then given a post-task debriefing interview. Qualitative data were analyzed and coded. Quantitative data like success of task and time to completion were also recorded.\nMain Results – Success rate varied among tasks: Finding a book in reserves had the highest rate at 75%, while finding a database had the lowest at 50%. Time also varied from 12 minutes to find a book in the stacks to just under 6 minutes to find a database. Seven of the 12 participants indicated they had prior library experience; however, they still encountered skill gaps. They lacked familiarity with the space, policies, website, and terminology. Participants also struggled with library jargon and inconsistent use of jargon among staff and librarians.\nConclusion – The researchers discovered there were discrepancies between language used in signs, directions provided by staff, and information provided on the website. Signage was important because several participants made remarks on lack a familiarity with the library space. They would get lost and anxious. In addition, the video recordings and subsequent discussions among the staff and librarians showed issues arising from the power dynamics in the library organization. Staff felt pressured to provide reference services when librarians were unavailable due to staffing shortages, which led to miscommunication. These conclusions lead to empathy-based training to address language discrepancies and experiences among staff. It also provided additional rationale for hiring.","PeriodicalId":45227,"journal":{"name":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Miscommunication and Employee Power Dynamics May Affect Student Navigation of Library Resources\",\"authors\":\"M. Bridgeman\",\"doi\":\"10.18438/eblip30287\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of:\\nAlmeida, N., & Tidal, J. (2022). Library wayfinding and ESOL students: Communication challenges and empathy-based intervention. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(2), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0025  \\nObjective – To map the experiences of students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) navigating an academic library.\\nDesign – A wayfinding study to evaluate how students navigate a library.\\nSetting – An urban-based academic library at an institution of higher education.\\nSubjects – Students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL).\\nMethods – A mixed methods study including visual recordings, web screen capture, interviews, and surveys. Subjects were recruited through email. Twelve participants were selected and given an initial screening survey. They were given four tasks to complete: Find a book in the stacks, find a book in the reserves, find a DVD in media, and find a database. They were equipped with a GoPro camera and were given a think-aloud protocol (TAP). They were then given a post-task debriefing interview. Qualitative data were analyzed and coded. Quantitative data like success of task and time to completion were also recorded.\\nMain Results – Success rate varied among tasks: Finding a book in reserves had the highest rate at 75%, while finding a database had the lowest at 50%. Time also varied from 12 minutes to find a book in the stacks to just under 6 minutes to find a database. Seven of the 12 participants indicated they had prior library experience; however, they still encountered skill gaps. They lacked familiarity with the space, policies, website, and terminology. Participants also struggled with library jargon and inconsistent use of jargon among staff and librarians.\\nConclusion – The researchers discovered there were discrepancies between language used in signs, directions provided by staff, and information provided on the website. Signage was important because several participants made remarks on lack a familiarity with the library space. They would get lost and anxious. In addition, the video recordings and subsequent discussions among the staff and librarians showed issues arising from the power dynamics in the library organization. Staff felt pressured to provide reference services when librarians were unavailable due to staffing shortages, which led to miscommunication. These conclusions lead to empathy-based training to address language discrepancies and experiences among staff. It also provided additional rationale for hiring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45227,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30287\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evidence Based Library and Information Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18438/eblip30287","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述:Almeida,N.和Tidal,J.(2022)。图书馆寻路和ESOL学生:沟通挑战和基于同理心的干预。门户网站:图书馆与学院,22(2),453–474。https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0025目的——为其他语言使用者绘制英语学生在学术图书馆导航的体验图。设计——一项旨在评估学生如何浏览图书馆的寻路研究。设置——高等教育机构的城市学术图书馆。受试者-其他语言的英语学生(ESOL)。方法-混合方法研究,包括视觉记录、网络屏幕捕捉、访谈和调查。受试者通过电子邮件招募。选择了12名参与者,并对其进行了初步筛选调查。他们要完成四项任务:在书架上找一本书,在储备中找一本,在媒体上找一张DVD,以及找一个数据库。他们配备了GoPro摄像头,并接受了大声思考协议(TAP)。然后,他们接受了任务后汇报面试。对定性数据进行了分析和编码。还记录了任务成功率和完成时间等定量数据。主要结果-任务的成功率各不相同:在储备中查找书籍的成功率最高,为75%,而查找数据库的成功率最低,为50%。从12分钟在书堆中找到一本书到不到6分钟找到数据库,时间也各不相同。12名参与者中有7人表示他们以前有过图书馆工作经验;然而,他们仍然遇到了技能差距。他们不熟悉空间、政策、网站和术语。参与者还与图书馆术语以及工作人员和图书馆员之间术语使用的不一致作斗争。结论——研究人员发现,标志中使用的语言、工作人员提供的指示和网站上提供的信息之间存在差异。标识很重要,因为一些参与者表示对图书馆空间不熟悉。他们会迷路和焦虑。此外,工作人员和图书馆员之间的录像和随后的讨论显示了图书馆组织中权力动态所产生的问题。当图书馆员因人手短缺而无法提供参考服务时,工作人员感到有压力提供参考服务,这导致了沟通失误。这些结论导致了基于同理心的培训,以解决工作人员之间的语言差异和经历。它还提供了招聘的额外理由。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Miscommunication and Employee Power Dynamics May Affect Student Navigation of Library Resources
A Review of: Almeida, N., & Tidal, J. (2022). Library wayfinding and ESOL students: Communication challenges and empathy-based intervention. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 22(2), 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2022.0025   Objective – To map the experiences of students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) navigating an academic library. Design – A wayfinding study to evaluate how students navigate a library. Setting – An urban-based academic library at an institution of higher education. Subjects – Students of English for speakers of other languages (ESOL). Methods – A mixed methods study including visual recordings, web screen capture, interviews, and surveys. Subjects were recruited through email. Twelve participants were selected and given an initial screening survey. They were given four tasks to complete: Find a book in the stacks, find a book in the reserves, find a DVD in media, and find a database. They were equipped with a GoPro camera and were given a think-aloud protocol (TAP). They were then given a post-task debriefing interview. Qualitative data were analyzed and coded. Quantitative data like success of task and time to completion were also recorded. Main Results – Success rate varied among tasks: Finding a book in reserves had the highest rate at 75%, while finding a database had the lowest at 50%. Time also varied from 12 minutes to find a book in the stacks to just under 6 minutes to find a database. Seven of the 12 participants indicated they had prior library experience; however, they still encountered skill gaps. They lacked familiarity with the space, policies, website, and terminology. Participants also struggled with library jargon and inconsistent use of jargon among staff and librarians. Conclusion – The researchers discovered there were discrepancies between language used in signs, directions provided by staff, and information provided on the website. Signage was important because several participants made remarks on lack a familiarity with the library space. They would get lost and anxious. In addition, the video recordings and subsequent discussions among the staff and librarians showed issues arising from the power dynamics in the library organization. Staff felt pressured to provide reference services when librarians were unavailable due to staffing shortages, which led to miscommunication. These conclusions lead to empathy-based training to address language discrepancies and experiences among staff. It also provided additional rationale for hiring.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice
Evidence Based Library and Information Practice INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
44
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Students’ Perspective of the Advantages and Disadvantages of ChatGPT Compared to Reference Librarians Academic Libraries Can Develop AI Chatbots for Virtual Reference Services with Minimal Technical Knowledge and Limited Resources A Study on the Knowledge and Perception of Artificial Intelligence Increasing Student Engagement in a Re-opened Regional Campus Library: Results from a Student Focus Group Gauging Academic Unit Perceptions of Library Services During a Transition in University Budget Models
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1