约旦医疗保健提供者的COVID-19知识、意识和感知压力

Q4 Medicine Jordan Medical Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-30 DOI:10.35516/jmj.v57i3.1677
E. Aborajooh, Baraa Mafrachi, Muhammad A. Yassin, Lana Alhalaseh, Rami Dwairi, Nakhleh E. Abu- Yaghi, Yahya AL-Khazraji, M. Abufaraj
{"title":"约旦医疗保健提供者的COVID-19知识、意识和感知压力","authors":"E. Aborajooh, Baraa Mafrachi, Muhammad A. Yassin, Lana Alhalaseh, Rami Dwairi, Nakhleh E. Abu- Yaghi, Yahya AL-Khazraji, M. Abufaraj","doi":"10.35516/jmj.v57i3.1677","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Healthcare providers (HCPs) are frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. They are prone to increased risk of infection and psychological stress. \nAims: To measure levels of knowledge, awareness, and stress about COVID-19 among HCPs. \nMethods: This cross-sectional study of 397 HCPs utilized an internet-based validated questionnaire to evaluate knowledge about COVID-19, the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), future perceptions, and psychological distress. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with the degree of knowledge and psychological stress. \nResults: Overall, 24.4% showed excellent knowledge, while 54.4% and 21.2% demonstrated good and poor knowledge, respectively. Social media (61.7%) and medical papers (57.7%) were the most commonly used sources of information. Being a female (β=0.521, 95% CI 0.049–0.992), a physician (β=1.421, 95% CI 0.849–1.992), or using published literature to gain knowledge (β=1.161, 95% CI 0.657–1.664) were positive predictors of higher knowledge levels, whereas having higher levels of stress (β= -0.854, 95% CI -1.488 to -0.221) and using social media (β= -0.434, 95% CI -0.865 to -0.003) to gain information were negative predictors of knowledge levels. The availability of PPE was significantly associated with lower psychological stress (p=.01). \nConclusion: Institutions have to provide free evidence-based resources for HCPs about COVID-19, and PPE should be secured to reduce the amount of psychological stress associated with treating COVID-19 patients, as well as to improve their knowledge and the subsequent care provided","PeriodicalId":39681,"journal":{"name":"Jordan Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Knowledge, Awareness and Perceived Stress among Jordanian Healthcare Providers\",\"authors\":\"E. Aborajooh, Baraa Mafrachi, Muhammad A. Yassin, Lana Alhalaseh, Rami Dwairi, Nakhleh E. Abu- Yaghi, Yahya AL-Khazraji, M. Abufaraj\",\"doi\":\"10.35516/jmj.v57i3.1677\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Healthcare providers (HCPs) are frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. They are prone to increased risk of infection and psychological stress. \\nAims: To measure levels of knowledge, awareness, and stress about COVID-19 among HCPs. \\nMethods: This cross-sectional study of 397 HCPs utilized an internet-based validated questionnaire to evaluate knowledge about COVID-19, the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), future perceptions, and psychological distress. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with the degree of knowledge and psychological stress. \\nResults: Overall, 24.4% showed excellent knowledge, while 54.4% and 21.2% demonstrated good and poor knowledge, respectively. Social media (61.7%) and medical papers (57.7%) were the most commonly used sources of information. Being a female (β=0.521, 95% CI 0.049–0.992), a physician (β=1.421, 95% CI 0.849–1.992), or using published literature to gain knowledge (β=1.161, 95% CI 0.657–1.664) were positive predictors of higher knowledge levels, whereas having higher levels of stress (β= -0.854, 95% CI -1.488 to -0.221) and using social media (β= -0.434, 95% CI -0.865 to -0.003) to gain information were negative predictors of knowledge levels. The availability of PPE was significantly associated with lower psychological stress (p=.01). \\nConclusion: Institutions have to provide free evidence-based resources for HCPs about COVID-19, and PPE should be secured to reduce the amount of psychological stress associated with treating COVID-19 patients, as well as to improve their knowledge and the subsequent care provided\",\"PeriodicalId\":39681,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jordan Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v57i3.1677\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jordan Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35516/jmj.v57i3.1677","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在COVID-19大流行期间,医疗保健提供者(HCPs)是一线工作者。他们容易增加感染的风险和心理压力。目的:测量医务人员对COVID-19的知识、意识和压力水平。方法:对397名医护人员进行横断面研究,采用基于互联网的有效问卷,评估他们对COVID-19的了解、个人防护装备(PPE)的可用性、对未来的看法和心理困扰。采用单因素和多因素有序逻辑回归分析评估与知识程度和心理压力相关的因素。结果:总体而言,知识优秀者占24.4%,知识良者占54.4%,知识差者占21.2%。社交媒体(61.7%)和医学论文(57.7%)是最常用的信息来源。作为女性(β=0.521, 95% CI 0.049-0.992),医生(β=1.421, 95% CI 0.849-1.992),或使用已发表的文献获取知识(β=1.161, 95% CI 0.657-1.664)是知识水平较高的正预测因子,而压力水平较高(β= -0.854, 95% CI -1.488至-0.221)和使用社交媒体(β= -0.434, 95% CI -0.865至-0.003)获取信息是知识水平的负预测因子。PPE的可用性与较低的心理压力显著相关(p= 0.01)。结论:医疗机构必须为医护人员提供免费的COVID-19循证资源,并确保个人防护装备,以减少与治疗COVID-19患者相关的心理压力,并提高他们的知识和后续护理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 Knowledge, Awareness and Perceived Stress among Jordanian Healthcare Providers
Background: Healthcare providers (HCPs) are frontline workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. They are prone to increased risk of infection and psychological stress. Aims: To measure levels of knowledge, awareness, and stress about COVID-19 among HCPs. Methods: This cross-sectional study of 397 HCPs utilized an internet-based validated questionnaire to evaluate knowledge about COVID-19, the availability of personal protective equipment (PPE), future perceptions, and psychological distress. Univariate and multivariate ordinal logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate factors associated with the degree of knowledge and psychological stress. Results: Overall, 24.4% showed excellent knowledge, while 54.4% and 21.2% demonstrated good and poor knowledge, respectively. Social media (61.7%) and medical papers (57.7%) were the most commonly used sources of information. Being a female (β=0.521, 95% CI 0.049–0.992), a physician (β=1.421, 95% CI 0.849–1.992), or using published literature to gain knowledge (β=1.161, 95% CI 0.657–1.664) were positive predictors of higher knowledge levels, whereas having higher levels of stress (β= -0.854, 95% CI -1.488 to -0.221) and using social media (β= -0.434, 95% CI -0.865 to -0.003) to gain information were negative predictors of knowledge levels. The availability of PPE was significantly associated with lower psychological stress (p=.01). Conclusion: Institutions have to provide free evidence-based resources for HCPs about COVID-19, and PPE should be secured to reduce the amount of psychological stress associated with treating COVID-19 patients, as well as to improve their knowledge and the subsequent care provided
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jordan Medical Journal
Jordan Medical Journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
Hirschsprung Disease in Jordan: A Review and Status Update Poison Centers in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: History, Scope of Services, and Strengths and Weaknesses as Public Healthcare Providers Mediastinal Bronchogenic Cysts: Clinical Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment Outcomes Safety and Efficacy of Bone Marrow and Adipose Tissue Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of Spinal Cord Injury: A Preliminary Study Irisin’s Mechanism of Action and Levels in Physiological and Pathological Conditions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1