为什么要喝水?

IF 0.9 3区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Osiris Pub Date : 2020-01-01 DOI:10.1086/708805
J. Chaplin
{"title":"为什么要喝水?","authors":"J. Chaplin","doi":"10.1086/708805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2017, New Zealand’s Whanganui River was designated as having the same rights as a human person. The decision drew upon Maori belief in the animate status of nonhuman beings and depended on the legal power of a Western state. This article examines those two factors in relation to the history of drinking water as an essential part of human diet, focusing on early modern England/Britain. In the early modern period, water was stripped of a life-giving force with which earlier European authorities (not unlike the Maori) had endowed it, even as water was becoming a generic component of a recommended diet—recommended, not least, by state authorities. Medical interpreters who published their works in English distanced themselves from definitions of matter that had considered water as itself vital, and instead defined the material components of a healthy diet, including water, in terms that avoided any hint of vitalism. Encounter with the dietetic advice of other cultures did not revive belief in water’s vitalist properties; rather, that advice was assimilated to new expectations that beverages, especially water, should maintain a cool body and temperament. These transformations took place in an imperial context. It was the Royal Navy that declared the minimum units of drinking water necessary for humans (meaning its sailors), which was a historically novel development. To uncover these trends is to explore how change occurs, and therefore how it might occur in the future, as state power may more frequently need to align with beliefs in animate nature that today are mostly non-Western beliefs, in order to protect natural features and resources, not least for human health.","PeriodicalId":54659,"journal":{"name":"Osiris","volume":"35 1","pages":"99 - 122"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708805","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Drink Water?\",\"authors\":\"J. Chaplin\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/708805\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2017, New Zealand’s Whanganui River was designated as having the same rights as a human person. The decision drew upon Maori belief in the animate status of nonhuman beings and depended on the legal power of a Western state. This article examines those two factors in relation to the history of drinking water as an essential part of human diet, focusing on early modern England/Britain. In the early modern period, water was stripped of a life-giving force with which earlier European authorities (not unlike the Maori) had endowed it, even as water was becoming a generic component of a recommended diet—recommended, not least, by state authorities. Medical interpreters who published their works in English distanced themselves from definitions of matter that had considered water as itself vital, and instead defined the material components of a healthy diet, including water, in terms that avoided any hint of vitalism. Encounter with the dietetic advice of other cultures did not revive belief in water’s vitalist properties; rather, that advice was assimilated to new expectations that beverages, especially water, should maintain a cool body and temperament. These transformations took place in an imperial context. It was the Royal Navy that declared the minimum units of drinking water necessary for humans (meaning its sailors), which was a historically novel development. To uncover these trends is to explore how change occurs, and therefore how it might occur in the future, as state power may more frequently need to align with beliefs in animate nature that today are mostly non-Western beliefs, in order to protect natural features and resources, not least for human health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Osiris\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"99 - 122\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708805\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Osiris\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/708805\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Osiris","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708805","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

2017年,新西兰旺加尼河被指定享有与人类相同的权利。这一决定基于毛利人对非人类生命地位的信仰,并取决于西方国家的法律权力。本文将这两个因素与饮用水作为人类饮食的重要组成部分的历史联系起来,重点关注现代早期的英格兰/英国。在现代早期,水被剥夺了早期欧洲当局(与毛利人没有什么不同)赋予它的赋予生命的力量,尽管水正在成为推荐饮食的一般组成部分——尤其是由国家当局推荐的。用英语发表作品的医学口译员与那些认为水本身至关重要的物质的定义保持距离,而是用避免任何生命体征的方式来定义健康饮食的物质成分,包括水。遇到其他文化的饮食建议并没有使人们重新相信水的生命力;相反,这一建议被新的期望所同化,即饮料,尤其是水,应该保持凉爽的身体和气质。这些转变发生在帝国的背景下。是英国皇家海军宣布了人类(即水手)所需的最低饮用水单位,这是一个历史上的新发展。揭示这些趋势是为了探索变化是如何发生的,以及它在未来可能如何发生,因为国家权力可能更频繁地需要与当今大多是非西方信仰的有生命的自然信仰保持一致,以保护自然特征和资源,尤其是人类健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why Drink Water?
In 2017, New Zealand’s Whanganui River was designated as having the same rights as a human person. The decision drew upon Maori belief in the animate status of nonhuman beings and depended on the legal power of a Western state. This article examines those two factors in relation to the history of drinking water as an essential part of human diet, focusing on early modern England/Britain. In the early modern period, water was stripped of a life-giving force with which earlier European authorities (not unlike the Maori) had endowed it, even as water was becoming a generic component of a recommended diet—recommended, not least, by state authorities. Medical interpreters who published their works in English distanced themselves from definitions of matter that had considered water as itself vital, and instead defined the material components of a healthy diet, including water, in terms that avoided any hint of vitalism. Encounter with the dietetic advice of other cultures did not revive belief in water’s vitalist properties; rather, that advice was assimilated to new expectations that beverages, especially water, should maintain a cool body and temperament. These transformations took place in an imperial context. It was the Royal Navy that declared the minimum units of drinking water necessary for humans (meaning its sailors), which was a historically novel development. To uncover these trends is to explore how change occurs, and therefore how it might occur in the future, as state power may more frequently need to align with beliefs in animate nature that today are mostly non-Western beliefs, in order to protect natural features and resources, not least for human health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Osiris
Osiris 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Founded in 1936 by George Sarton, and relaunched by the History of Science Society in 1985, Osiris is an annual thematic journal that highlights research on significant themes in the history of science. Recent volumes have included Scientific Masculinities, History of Science and the Emotions, and Data Histories.
期刊最新文献
Front and Back Matter Notes on the Contributors Acknowledgments Statecraft by Algorithms Introduction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1