{"title":"策略性情绪智力的合意性方面与基于能力的测量之间的差异关系","authors":"Susan Hellwig, Ralf Schulze","doi":"10.1027/1614-0001/a000388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Since classical intelligence factors are almost independent of personality, independence from personality is expected analogously for new intelligence factors, such as Emotional Intelligence (EI). However, performance tests of Strategic EI, in particular, consistently show a positive relationship with self-reports of Agreeableness which has not yet been the subject of more detailed investigations. This paper aims to elucidate this relationship with a focus on facet-level relationships. In a study with N = 176 participants, the correlations between two strategic EI measures on the one hand, and measures of the Big Five personality factors as well as the facets of Agreeableness, on the other hand, are estimated at the level of latent variables. The results suggest that the relationships vary markedly by the facet of Agreeableness. Strategic EI measures are specifically correlated with measures of Agreeableness facets that include agreeable behavior for which emotional abilities are required. Furthermore, the results indicate that the strength of relationships between EI measures with personality traits depends on the scoring procedures (consensus vs. theory-based scoring) used for tests of EI.","PeriodicalId":47049,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Individual Differences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differential Relations Between Facets of Agreeableness and Ability-Based Measures of Strategic Emotional Intelligence\",\"authors\":\"Susan Hellwig, Ralf Schulze\",\"doi\":\"10.1027/1614-0001/a000388\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Since classical intelligence factors are almost independent of personality, independence from personality is expected analogously for new intelligence factors, such as Emotional Intelligence (EI). However, performance tests of Strategic EI, in particular, consistently show a positive relationship with self-reports of Agreeableness which has not yet been the subject of more detailed investigations. This paper aims to elucidate this relationship with a focus on facet-level relationships. In a study with N = 176 participants, the correlations between two strategic EI measures on the one hand, and measures of the Big Five personality factors as well as the facets of Agreeableness, on the other hand, are estimated at the level of latent variables. The results suggest that the relationships vary markedly by the facet of Agreeableness. Strategic EI measures are specifically correlated with measures of Agreeableness facets that include agreeable behavior for which emotional abilities are required. Furthermore, the results indicate that the strength of relationships between EI measures with personality traits depends on the scoring procedures (consensus vs. theory-based scoring) used for tests of EI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Individual Differences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Individual Differences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000388\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Individual Differences","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001/a000388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Differential Relations Between Facets of Agreeableness and Ability-Based Measures of Strategic Emotional Intelligence
Abstract. Since classical intelligence factors are almost independent of personality, independence from personality is expected analogously for new intelligence factors, such as Emotional Intelligence (EI). However, performance tests of Strategic EI, in particular, consistently show a positive relationship with self-reports of Agreeableness which has not yet been the subject of more detailed investigations. This paper aims to elucidate this relationship with a focus on facet-level relationships. In a study with N = 176 participants, the correlations between two strategic EI measures on the one hand, and measures of the Big Five personality factors as well as the facets of Agreeableness, on the other hand, are estimated at the level of latent variables. The results suggest that the relationships vary markedly by the facet of Agreeableness. Strategic EI measures are specifically correlated with measures of Agreeableness facets that include agreeable behavior for which emotional abilities are required. Furthermore, the results indicate that the strength of relationships between EI measures with personality traits depends on the scoring procedures (consensus vs. theory-based scoring) used for tests of EI.
期刊介绍:
Researchers, teachers, and students interested in all areas of individual differences (e.g., gender, temperament, personality, intelligence) and their assessment in human and animal research will find the Journal of Individual Differences useful. The Journal of Individual Differences publishes manuscripts dealing with individual differences in behavior, emotion, cognition, and their developmental aspects. This includes human as well as animal research. The Journal of Individual Differences is conceptualized to bring together researchers working in different areas ranging from, for example, molecular genetics to theories of complex behavior.