先实践,后理论

PsycCritiques Pub Date : 2017-10-02 DOI:10.1037/A0041032
R. Bretherton
{"title":"先实践,后理论","authors":"R. Bretherton","doi":"10.1037/A0041032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Review of Handbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors by Jeffrey K. Edwards, Andy Young, and Holly J. Nikels (Eds.) New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2017. 374 pp. \nHandbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors, an edited volume of 23 chapters, opens by outlining what is meant by strengths-based practice. The opening chapters introduce the reader to pioneers of the approach in therapeutic practice, health, and social care. One definition, provided by Lopez and Louis (2009), suggests that the strengths-based perspective “assumes that every individual has resources that can be mobilised towards success in many areas of life and is characterised by efforts to ‘label what is right’ within people and organisations” (p. 2). Another key characteristic of strengths-based practice is the renunciation of the medical model, with its overemphasis on problems without due attention to the strengths and positive qualities of those treated. Dennis Saleebey’s (2012) strengths-based approach to social work is especially prominent. Strengths-based practice, we are told, is not a recent development; practitioners have been operating in this way for over 130 years. It is a broad field, encompassing numerous disciplines and approaches that may not always be placed together but nevertheless bear some strong family resemblances.","PeriodicalId":90306,"journal":{"name":"PsycCritiques","volume":" ","pages":"&NA;"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice First, Theory Later\",\"authors\":\"R. Bretherton\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/A0041032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Review of Handbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors by Jeffrey K. Edwards, Andy Young, and Holly J. Nikels (Eds.) New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2017. 374 pp. \\nHandbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors, an edited volume of 23 chapters, opens by outlining what is meant by strengths-based practice. The opening chapters introduce the reader to pioneers of the approach in therapeutic practice, health, and social care. One definition, provided by Lopez and Louis (2009), suggests that the strengths-based perspective “assumes that every individual has resources that can be mobilised towards success in many areas of life and is characterised by efforts to ‘label what is right’ within people and organisations” (p. 2). Another key characteristic of strengths-based practice is the renunciation of the medical model, with its overemphasis on problems without due attention to the strengths and positive qualities of those treated. Dennis Saleebey’s (2012) strengths-based approach to social work is especially prominent. Strengths-based practice, we are told, is not a recent development; practitioners have been operating in this way for over 130 years. It is a broad field, encompassing numerous disciplines and approaches that may not always be placed together but nevertheless bear some strong family resemblances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90306,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PsycCritiques\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"&NA;\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PsycCritiques\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0041032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PsycCritiques","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/A0041032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Jeffrey K.Edwards、Andy Young和Holly J.Nikels(编辑)的《基于优势的临床实践手册:寻找共同因素》综述,纽约:Routledge/Taylor&Francis,2017。374页。《基于优势的临床实践手册:寻找共同因素》是一本由23章组成的编辑卷,开篇概述了基于优势的实践的含义。开头几章向读者介绍了该方法在治疗实践、健康和社会护理方面的先驱。Lopez和Louis(2009)提出的一个定义表明,基于优势的观点“假设每个人都有可以在生活的许多领域获得成功的资源,其特点是努力在人和组织中‘标记什么是正确的’”(第2页)。基于力量的实践的另一个关键特征是放弃医学模式,过分强调问题,而没有适当关注被治疗者的力量和积极品质。Dennis Saleebey(2012)的基于优势的社会工作方法尤其突出。我们被告知,基于优势的实践并不是最近的发展;从业人员已经以这种方式运作了130多年。这是一个广泛的领域,涵盖了许多学科和方法,这些学科和方法可能并不总是放在一起,但仍有一些强烈的家族相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Practice First, Theory Later
A Review of Handbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors by Jeffrey K. Edwards, Andy Young, and Holly J. Nikels (Eds.) New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor & Francis, 2017. 374 pp. Handbook of Strengths-Based Clinical Practices: Finding Common Factors, an edited volume of 23 chapters, opens by outlining what is meant by strengths-based practice. The opening chapters introduce the reader to pioneers of the approach in therapeutic practice, health, and social care. One definition, provided by Lopez and Louis (2009), suggests that the strengths-based perspective “assumes that every individual has resources that can be mobilised towards success in many areas of life and is characterised by efforts to ‘label what is right’ within people and organisations” (p. 2). Another key characteristic of strengths-based practice is the renunciation of the medical model, with its overemphasis on problems without due attention to the strengths and positive qualities of those treated. Dennis Saleebey’s (2012) strengths-based approach to social work is especially prominent. Strengths-based practice, we are told, is not a recent development; practitioners have been operating in this way for over 130 years. It is a broad field, encompassing numerous disciplines and approaches that may not always be placed together but nevertheless bear some strong family resemblances.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Behavioral Activation, Depression, and Promotion of Health Behaviors: A Scoping Review. Decolorization of various dyes by microorganisms and green-synthesized nanoparticles: current and future perspective. Hierarchy of Evidence: An Appraisal Tool for Weighting the Evidence in Healthcare Design Research Based on Internal Validity. 3D-bioprinted cardiac tissues and their potential for disease modeling. [Applying of magnetic resonance tomography for assessment of cardiac remodeling and risk stratification in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1