韩国6个工业污水处理厂进出水COD和TOC的比较

Soo-Ho Park, Chaeyoung Lee, Keugtae Kim, H. Kim, Wontae Lee
{"title":"韩国6个工业污水处理厂进出水COD和TOC的比较","authors":"Soo-Ho Park, Chaeyoung Lee, Keugtae Kim, H. Kim, Wontae Lee","doi":"10.4491/ksee.2022.44.5.143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : This study compared the CODMn and TOC concentrations of the influent and effluent from six industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities in the industrial complexes, and to understand the correlation between the two indicators.Methods : The sampling campaigns were performed four times at each WWTP for both influent and effluent. Water quality surveys were also conducted to assess the characteristics of organic matter in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities. A total of 272 facilities including manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and miscellaneous manufacturing units were surveyed. Results and Discussion : The CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and the effluent of the WWTPs ranged from 0.78 to 1.79 (average 1.19) and 0.94 to 1.58 (average 1.20), respectively. The ratio of CODMn/TOC ratio in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities was 1.06~1.22 (average 1.12). Industries with high R2 values for the CODMn/TOC ratios included rubber and plastics manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.17), nonferrous metals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.94), medical materials and pharmaceutical manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.98), and chemicals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.27).Conclusion : CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and effluent of the six plants and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities varied in different ranges for each WWTP, with an average value of 1.12. The results of this study can be used as basic information to manage the effluent water quality of the WWTPs.","PeriodicalId":52756,"journal":{"name":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of COD and TOC in influents and effluents of six industrial wastewater treatment plants in Korea\",\"authors\":\"Soo-Ho Park, Chaeyoung Lee, Keugtae Kim, H. Kim, Wontae Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.4491/ksee.2022.44.5.143\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives : This study compared the CODMn and TOC concentrations of the influent and effluent from six industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities in the industrial complexes, and to understand the correlation between the two indicators.Methods : The sampling campaigns were performed four times at each WWTP for both influent and effluent. Water quality surveys were also conducted to assess the characteristics of organic matter in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities. A total of 272 facilities including manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and miscellaneous manufacturing units were surveyed. Results and Discussion : The CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and the effluent of the WWTPs ranged from 0.78 to 1.79 (average 1.19) and 0.94 to 1.58 (average 1.20), respectively. The ratio of CODMn/TOC ratio in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities was 1.06~1.22 (average 1.12). Industries with high R2 values for the CODMn/TOC ratios included rubber and plastics manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.17), nonferrous metals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.94), medical materials and pharmaceutical manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.98), and chemicals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.27).Conclusion : CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and effluent of the six plants and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities varied in different ranges for each WWTP, with an average value of 1.12. The results of this study can be used as basic information to manage the effluent water quality of the WWTPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52756,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.5.143\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"daehanhwangyeonggonghaghoeji","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4491/ksee.2022.44.5.143","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究比较了6个工业废水处理厂进出水和工业园区生产设施废水的CODMn和TOC浓度,并了解这两个指标之间的相关性。方法:在每个污水处理厂对进水和出水进行四次采样。还进行了水质调查,以评估生产设施废水中有机物质的特征。共调查了272个设施,包括制造业、非制造业和杂项制造业单位。结果与讨论:污水处理厂进水和出水的CODMn/TOC比值分别为0.78 ~ 1.79(平均1.19)和0.94 ~ 1.58(平均1.20)。生产废水中CODMn/TOC比值为1.06~1.22,平均为1.12。CODMn/TOC比值R2值较高的行业包括橡胶和塑料制造业(CODMn/TOC = 1.17)、有色金属制造业(CODMn/TOC = 0.94)、医疗材料和制药制造业(CODMn/TOC = 0.98)和化学品制造业(CODMn/TOC = 1.27)。结论:各污水处理厂进水、出水及生产设施废水的CODMn/TOC比值存在不同范围的差异,平均值为1.12。研究结果可作为污水处理厂出水水质管理的基础资料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of COD and TOC in influents and effluents of six industrial wastewater treatment plants in Korea
Objectives : This study compared the CODMn and TOC concentrations of the influent and effluent from six industrial wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs) and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities in the industrial complexes, and to understand the correlation between the two indicators.Methods : The sampling campaigns were performed four times at each WWTP for both influent and effluent. Water quality surveys were also conducted to assess the characteristics of organic matter in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities. A total of 272 facilities including manufacturing, non-manufacturing, and miscellaneous manufacturing units were surveyed. Results and Discussion : The CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and the effluent of the WWTPs ranged from 0.78 to 1.79 (average 1.19) and 0.94 to 1.58 (average 1.20), respectively. The ratio of CODMn/TOC ratio in the wastewater from the manufacturing facilities was 1.06~1.22 (average 1.12). Industries with high R2 values for the CODMn/TOC ratios included rubber and plastics manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.17), nonferrous metals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.94), medical materials and pharmaceutical manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 0.98), and chemicals manufacturing (CODMn/TOC = 1.27).Conclusion : CODMn/TOC ratios of the influent and effluent of the six plants and the wastewater from manufacturing facilities varied in different ranges for each WWTP, with an average value of 1.12. The results of this study can be used as basic information to manage the effluent water quality of the WWTPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Domestic Wastewater Treatment Processes by Modeling: Existing Estimation Methods vs Modeling A Study on Assessment of Carbon Absorption Footprint (CAF) and Forestation in Local Governments Greenhouse Gas Emissions of an Urban Water System in Korea: A case study of Paju city Evaluation of the Chemical Characteristics and Predictive Model of Water-Soluble Inorganic Ions for Fine Particulate Matter Generated in Pohang Characteristics of Soil Heavy Metal Contamination in the Intensive Livestock Farming Watersheds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1