海峡两岸没有共识:有争议的地区秩序中的中国和台湾战略沟通

IF 1.3 3区社会学 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Asian Perspective Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1353/apr.2021.0033

A. Insisa

{"title":"海峡两岸没有共识:有争议的地区秩序中的中国和台湾战略沟通","authors":"A. Insisa","doi":"10.1353/apr.2021.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:After the 2016 elections, cross-Strait relations have fallen to their lowest point since the Third Strait Crisis. A proliferation of state-driven strategic narratives by both sides has since emerged. Against Beijing's narratives of \"national rejuvenation,\" peaceful reunification, and \"1992 Consensus,\" the Tsai administration has contraposed an image of Taiwan as a \"beacon\" of freedom and democracy in the Indo-Pacific. By tracing the tenets and the operationalization of Beijing and Taipei's strategic communications from the late 2000s to 2020, this article shows how Chinese and Taiwanese actors' reactions to the systemic pressure of a shifting East Asian regional order have progressively shaped cross-Strait communicative dynamics, severely constraining the range of options that could overcome the current impasse.","PeriodicalId":45424,"journal":{"name":"Asian Perspective","volume":"45 1","pages":"503 - 531"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Consensus Across the Strait: Chinese and Taiwanese Strategic Communications in a Contested Regional Order\",\"authors\":\"A. Insisa\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/apr.2021.0033\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:After the 2016 elections, cross-Strait relations have fallen to their lowest point since the Third Strait Crisis. A proliferation of state-driven strategic narratives by both sides has since emerged. Against Beijing's narratives of \\\"national rejuvenation,\\\" peaceful reunification, and \\\"1992 Consensus,\\\" the Tsai administration has contraposed an image of Taiwan as a \\\"beacon\\\" of freedom and democracy in the Indo-Pacific. By tracing the tenets and the operationalization of Beijing and Taipei's strategic communications from the late 2000s to 2020, this article shows how Chinese and Taiwanese actors' reactions to the systemic pressure of a shifting East Asian regional order have progressively shaped cross-Strait communicative dynamics, severely constraining the range of options that could overcome the current impasse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45424,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"503 - 531\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Perspective\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0033\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Perspective","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/apr.2021.0033","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 5

摘要

摘要:2016年大选后，两岸关系跌至第三次海峡危机以来的最低点。此后，双方都出现了大量由国家驱动的战略叙事。与北京的“民族复兴”、和平统一和“九二共识”的叙述相反，蔡英文政府将台湾视为印度太平洋地区自由和民主的“灯塔”。通过追溯北京和台北从2000年代末到2020年战略沟通的原则和运作，本文展示了中国和台湾参与者对东亚地区秩序变化的系统性压力的反应如何逐步塑造了两岸沟通的动态，严重限制了可以克服当前僵局的选择范围。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

No Consensus Across the Strait: Chinese and Taiwanese Strategic Communications in a Contested Regional Order

Abstract:After the 2016 elections, cross-Strait relations have fallen to their lowest point since the Third Strait Crisis. A proliferation of state-driven strategic narratives by both sides has since emerged. Against Beijing's narratives of "national rejuvenation," peaceful reunification, and "1992 Consensus," the Tsai administration has contraposed an image of Taiwan as a "beacon" of freedom and democracy in the Indo-Pacific. By tracing the tenets and the operationalization of Beijing and Taipei's strategic communications from the late 2000s to 2020, this article shows how Chinese and Taiwanese actors' reactions to the systemic pressure of a shifting East Asian regional order have progressively shaped cross-Strait communicative dynamics, severely constraining the range of options that could overcome the current impasse.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Asian Perspective INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-

CiteScore

1.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： ASIAN PERSPECTIVE is the peer-reviewed social sciences journal of world/comparative politics of the Institute for Far Eastern Studies, Kyungnam University. Published quarterly, Asian Perspective has devoted its pages to critical analysis of the global, regional, and transnational issues affecting Northeast Asia for over 25 years. Bringing cogent, thought-provoking examination of the significant developments in Asia and the world as they unfold to the scrutiny of its readership, Asian Perspective continues to promote a healthy exchange of ideas among scholars, students, and policymakers.