{"title":"保护和土著抵抗:秘鲁亚马逊地区的保护区和采掘业议程","authors":"Ana Watson Jimenez, Conny Davidsen","doi":"10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expanding natural protected areas in the Peruvian Amazon compete with indigenous interests and resource extraction, in a dynamic process of endorsement and enforcement by local indigenous communities. The analysis presents a geographical case study of Peru’s emblematic Camisea gas extraction project in the Amazonian Lower Urubamba valley, Cusco. The focus is on two protected areas —Matsigenka Communal Reserve and Megantoni National Sanctuary— that were created alongside the gas project in the early 2000s, strategically supported by local indigenous communities. The study argues that the intersections of extractive and conservation agendas in Camisea have created ambiguous and novel spaces for the expression of local indigenous agendas, while neoliberal conservation territorial logics simultaneously limit them. This empirical analysis contributes to a deeper empirical understanding of Indigenous conservation priorities, political demands, and long-term strategies regarding territorial and legal categories of conservation, carefully negotiated within highly fragmented and weak formal institutional state arrangements in the Peruvian Amazon.","PeriodicalId":53932,"journal":{"name":"Debates en Sociologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conservation and Indigenous resistance: Protected Areas and extractive agendas in the Peruvian Amazon\",\"authors\":\"Ana Watson Jimenez, Conny Davidsen\",\"doi\":\"10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Expanding natural protected areas in the Peruvian Amazon compete with indigenous interests and resource extraction, in a dynamic process of endorsement and enforcement by local indigenous communities. The analysis presents a geographical case study of Peru’s emblematic Camisea gas extraction project in the Amazonian Lower Urubamba valley, Cusco. The focus is on two protected areas —Matsigenka Communal Reserve and Megantoni National Sanctuary— that were created alongside the gas project in the early 2000s, strategically supported by local indigenous communities. The study argues that the intersections of extractive and conservation agendas in Camisea have created ambiguous and novel spaces for the expression of local indigenous agendas, while neoliberal conservation territorial logics simultaneously limit them. This empirical analysis contributes to a deeper empirical understanding of Indigenous conservation priorities, political demands, and long-term strategies regarding territorial and legal categories of conservation, carefully negotiated within highly fragmented and weak formal institutional state arrangements in the Peruvian Amazon.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Debates en Sociologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Debates en Sociologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Debates en Sociologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18800/debatesensociologia.202201.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
摘要
在当地土著社区的支持和执行的动态过程中,扩大秘鲁亚马逊地区的自然保护区与土著利益和资源开采竞争。该分析介绍了秘鲁在库斯科亚马逊下乌鲁班巴河谷的标志性卡米萨天然气开采项目的地理案例研究。重点是两个保护区——Matsigenka Communal Reserve和Megantoni National Sanctuary——它们是在21世纪初与天然气项目一起创建的,得到了当地土著社区的战略支持。该研究认为,卡米塞的采掘和保护议程的交叉为当地土著议程的表达创造了模糊而新颖的空间,而新自由主义的保护领土逻辑同时限制了它们。这一实证分析有助于更深入地从实证角度理解土著保护的优先事项、政治要求以及关于领土和法律保护类别的长期战略,这些都是在秘鲁亚马逊地区高度分散和薄弱的正式制度国家安排内仔细协商的。
Conservation and Indigenous resistance: Protected Areas and extractive agendas in the Peruvian Amazon
Expanding natural protected areas in the Peruvian Amazon compete with indigenous interests and resource extraction, in a dynamic process of endorsement and enforcement by local indigenous communities. The analysis presents a geographical case study of Peru’s emblematic Camisea gas extraction project in the Amazonian Lower Urubamba valley, Cusco. The focus is on two protected areas —Matsigenka Communal Reserve and Megantoni National Sanctuary— that were created alongside the gas project in the early 2000s, strategically supported by local indigenous communities. The study argues that the intersections of extractive and conservation agendas in Camisea have created ambiguous and novel spaces for the expression of local indigenous agendas, while neoliberal conservation territorial logics simultaneously limit them. This empirical analysis contributes to a deeper empirical understanding of Indigenous conservation priorities, political demands, and long-term strategies regarding territorial and legal categories of conservation, carefully negotiated within highly fragmented and weak formal institutional state arrangements in the Peruvian Amazon.