用于东南亚国家体重管理行为的健康信念模型问卷(HBMQ)的翻译、跨文化适应和验证

IF 0.5 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1093/jphsr/rmac052
Sivasankari Raman, S. C. Ong, G. Ooi
{"title":"用于东南亚国家体重管理行为的健康信念模型问卷(HBMQ)的翻译、跨文化适应和验证","authors":"Sivasankari Raman, S. C. Ong, G. Ooi","doi":"10.1093/jphsr/rmac052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n In the past 50 years, obesity and being overweight have become significant health concerns that cause a rise in the risk of illness, impairing quality of life and increasing financial burdens worldwide. The purpose of the study is to conduct translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a Health Belief Model Questionnaire (HBMQ) for weight management behaviour into the Malay language and to validate the questionnaire.\n \n \n \n The HBMQ was adapted and translated into the Malay language based on published international guidelines. The content validity and the face validity were analysed by a panel of 10 experts. A pilot test was conducted with 35 students from Universiti Sains Malaysia to evaluate internal consistency. A cross-sectional study was carried out by distributing the self-administered HBMQ to the general public in Malaysia and 505 subjects were successfully recruited. The construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis. The first 112 participants completed the survey again one week later for the evaluation of test-retest reliability.\n \n \n \n In total, 79 questions had an item-level content validity index (I-CVI) score of >0.80 and have been evaluated as excellent inferring acceptable content validity. The remaining seven items in the instrument had an I-CVI score < 0.80 and were removed based on the experts’ consensus. The item-level face validity index value for each item range was between 0.8 and 1.0, indicating a satisfactory level of face validity. For construct validity, eight factors were requested and 74 items had a significant to strong factor loading of >0.4. The rotation of items showed five items had factor loadings <0.4 (item numbers 14, 57, 77, 78 and 79) and have been removed.\n \n \n \n The findings in this study conclude that the translated Health Belief Model-Malay version has adequate content validity, face validity, construct validity and reliability.\n","PeriodicalId":16705,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Health Belief Model Questionnaire (HBMQ) for weight management behaviour for use in a Southeast Asian country\",\"authors\":\"Sivasankari Raman, S. C. Ong, G. Ooi\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/jphsr/rmac052\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n \\n \\n In the past 50 years, obesity and being overweight have become significant health concerns that cause a rise in the risk of illness, impairing quality of life and increasing financial burdens worldwide. The purpose of the study is to conduct translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a Health Belief Model Questionnaire (HBMQ) for weight management behaviour into the Malay language and to validate the questionnaire.\\n \\n \\n \\n The HBMQ was adapted and translated into the Malay language based on published international guidelines. The content validity and the face validity were analysed by a panel of 10 experts. A pilot test was conducted with 35 students from Universiti Sains Malaysia to evaluate internal consistency. A cross-sectional study was carried out by distributing the self-administered HBMQ to the general public in Malaysia and 505 subjects were successfully recruited. The construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis. The first 112 participants completed the survey again one week later for the evaluation of test-retest reliability.\\n \\n \\n \\n In total, 79 questions had an item-level content validity index (I-CVI) score of >0.80 and have been evaluated as excellent inferring acceptable content validity. The remaining seven items in the instrument had an I-CVI score < 0.80 and were removed based on the experts’ consensus. The item-level face validity index value for each item range was between 0.8 and 1.0, indicating a satisfactory level of face validity. For construct validity, eight factors were requested and 74 items had a significant to strong factor loading of >0.4. The rotation of items showed five items had factor loadings <0.4 (item numbers 14, 57, 77, 78 and 79) and have been removed.\\n \\n \\n \\n The findings in this study conclude that the translated Health Belief Model-Malay version has adequate content validity, face validity, construct validity and reliability.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":16705,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac052\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jphsr/rmac052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去50年里,肥胖和超重已成为严重的健康问题,在世界范围内造成疾病风险上升、生活质量下降和经济负担增加。本研究的目的是将体重管理行为的健康信念模型问卷(HBMQ)翻译成马来语并进行跨文化改编,并验证问卷。HBMQ是根据已出版的国际指南改编并翻译成马来语的。内容效度和面孔效度由10名专家组成的小组进行分析。马来西亚圣士大学的35名学生进行了试点测试,以评估内部一致性。横断面研究通过向马来西亚公众分发自我管理的HBMQ进行,成功招募了505名受试者。采用探索性因子分析评价构念效度。第一批112名参与者在一周后再次完成调查,以评估重测信度。共有79个问题的项目级内容效度指数(I-CVI)得分为>.80,被评为优秀的推断可接受内容效度。仪器中其余7项I-CVI评分< 0.80,根据专家一致意见予以删除。项目层面的面效度指数值在0.8 ~ 1.0之间,显示出满意的面效度水平。在构念效度方面,共要求8个因子,其中74个因子的显著至强负荷为b>.4。项目轮换显示,有5个项目的因子负荷<0.4(项目编号14、57、77、78和79),已被删除。本研究发现马来语健康信念模型具有足够的内容效度、面孔效度、建构效度和信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Health Belief Model Questionnaire (HBMQ) for weight management behaviour for use in a Southeast Asian country
In the past 50 years, obesity and being overweight have become significant health concerns that cause a rise in the risk of illness, impairing quality of life and increasing financial burdens worldwide. The purpose of the study is to conduct translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a Health Belief Model Questionnaire (HBMQ) for weight management behaviour into the Malay language and to validate the questionnaire. The HBMQ was adapted and translated into the Malay language based on published international guidelines. The content validity and the face validity were analysed by a panel of 10 experts. A pilot test was conducted with 35 students from Universiti Sains Malaysia to evaluate internal consistency. A cross-sectional study was carried out by distributing the self-administered HBMQ to the general public in Malaysia and 505 subjects were successfully recruited. The construct validity was evaluated by exploratory factor analysis. The first 112 participants completed the survey again one week later for the evaluation of test-retest reliability. In total, 79 questions had an item-level content validity index (I-CVI) score of >0.80 and have been evaluated as excellent inferring acceptable content validity. The remaining seven items in the instrument had an I-CVI score < 0.80 and were removed based on the experts’ consensus. The item-level face validity index value for each item range was between 0.8 and 1.0, indicating a satisfactory level of face validity. For construct validity, eight factors were requested and 74 items had a significant to strong factor loading of >0.4. The rotation of items showed five items had factor loadings <0.4 (item numbers 14, 57, 77, 78 and 79) and have been removed. The findings in this study conclude that the translated Health Belief Model-Malay version has adequate content validity, face validity, construct validity and reliability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Services Research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
The revised patient attitudes to deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire: an investigation using a large anonymized database Evaluation of a structured pharmacist-led intervention on glycemic control in underprivileged diabetic patients: a randomized open-label trial Cross-sectional study of pharmacists’ knowledge and beliefs about human papillomavirus, its vaccines, and barriers related to vaccine administration Analysis of cancer drugs receiving FDA’s Accelerated Approval between 1992 and 2021 Navigating digital health: perspectives of Australian community pharmacists—a short communication
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1