{"title":"问卷设计中,指示和问题的颜色对被调查者的“调查认知度、反应时间和反应准确性”的影响","authors":"JeongHyun Kim, Eunryung Hyun","doi":"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background In recent times, there have been frequent cases of insincere respondents as the survey environment changed from the previous printing basis. Insincere responses, which create errors and missing values, tarnish the meaning of the survey as a data collection tool. This study aims to discover the cause of such insincere responses through a pilot research. In order to solve the problem, the study applied color, — a cognitive information design element —, in designing the survey and analyzed its effectiveness in terms of survey recognition, response time, and response accuracy. Methods A pilot study was conducted through structural in-depth interviews in respect to qualitative research to discover the cause of insincere responses. A new survey tool was designed with cognitive information design elements based on the earlier theories. Lastly, 90 men and women over the age of 19 who were divided into control and experimental groups between October and December 2022. The survey was composed of 13 questions. Afterwards, We used SPSS 21.0 to compare the groups’ answers to verify the effectiveness of applying color in designing the survey. Results According to the results of difference checks and crossover analysis, the experimental group’s t value at –2.180** was higher in the cognitive section’s question ① (definition of data visualization). Also, in the response time section’s question ⑤ (length of time spent on checking the question), the experimental group’s value of 1.950 was shorter than that of the control group. For the response accuracy section’s question ⑦ (confirming the visual checklist required by the questionnaire), the experimental group showed 20 percent higher accuracy than the control group. In the case of question ⑧ (checking how to properly write down one’s answer in accordance with the questionnaire), the experimental group demonstrated 15.5 percent higher answer rate than the control group.","PeriodicalId":52137,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Design Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Color of the Instructions and Questions on the Respondents’ ‘Survey Recognition, Response Time, and Response Accuracy’ in Designing a Survey\",\"authors\":\"JeongHyun Kim, Eunryung Hyun\",\"doi\":\"10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background In recent times, there have been frequent cases of insincere respondents as the survey environment changed from the previous printing basis. Insincere responses, which create errors and missing values, tarnish the meaning of the survey as a data collection tool. This study aims to discover the cause of such insincere responses through a pilot research. In order to solve the problem, the study applied color, — a cognitive information design element —, in designing the survey and analyzed its effectiveness in terms of survey recognition, response time, and response accuracy. Methods A pilot study was conducted through structural in-depth interviews in respect to qualitative research to discover the cause of insincere responses. A new survey tool was designed with cognitive information design elements based on the earlier theories. Lastly, 90 men and women over the age of 19 who were divided into control and experimental groups between October and December 2022. The survey was composed of 13 questions. Afterwards, We used SPSS 21.0 to compare the groups’ answers to verify the effectiveness of applying color in designing the survey. Results According to the results of difference checks and crossover analysis, the experimental group’s t value at –2.180** was higher in the cognitive section’s question ① (definition of data visualization). Also, in the response time section’s question ⑤ (length of time spent on checking the question), the experimental group’s value of 1.950 was shorter than that of the control group. For the response accuracy section’s question ⑦ (confirming the visual checklist required by the questionnaire), the experimental group showed 20 percent higher accuracy than the control group. In the case of question ⑧ (checking how to properly write down one’s answer in accordance with the questionnaire), the experimental group demonstrated 15.5 percent higher answer rate than the control group.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Design Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Design Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15187/adr.2023.08.36.3.273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Impact of Color of the Instructions and Questions on the Respondents’ ‘Survey Recognition, Response Time, and Response Accuracy’ in Designing a Survey
Background In recent times, there have been frequent cases of insincere respondents as the survey environment changed from the previous printing basis. Insincere responses, which create errors and missing values, tarnish the meaning of the survey as a data collection tool. This study aims to discover the cause of such insincere responses through a pilot research. In order to solve the problem, the study applied color, — a cognitive information design element —, in designing the survey and analyzed its effectiveness in terms of survey recognition, response time, and response accuracy. Methods A pilot study was conducted through structural in-depth interviews in respect to qualitative research to discover the cause of insincere responses. A new survey tool was designed with cognitive information design elements based on the earlier theories. Lastly, 90 men and women over the age of 19 who were divided into control and experimental groups between October and December 2022. The survey was composed of 13 questions. Afterwards, We used SPSS 21.0 to compare the groups’ answers to verify the effectiveness of applying color in designing the survey. Results According to the results of difference checks and crossover analysis, the experimental group’s t value at –2.180** was higher in the cognitive section’s question ① (definition of data visualization). Also, in the response time section’s question ⑤ (length of time spent on checking the question), the experimental group’s value of 1.950 was shorter than that of the control group. For the response accuracy section’s question ⑦ (confirming the visual checklist required by the questionnaire), the experimental group showed 20 percent higher accuracy than the control group. In the case of question ⑧ (checking how to properly write down one’s answer in accordance with the questionnaire), the experimental group demonstrated 15.5 percent higher answer rate than the control group.
期刊介绍:
Archives of Design Research (ADR) is an international journal publishing original research in the field of design, including industrial design, visual communication design, interaction design, space design, and service design. It also invites research outcomes from design-related interdisciplinary fields such as the humanities, arts, technology, society and business. It is an open-access journal, publishing four issues per year. Currently papers are published in both English and Korean with an English abstract. ADR aims to build a strong foundation of knowledge in design through the introduction of basic, applied and clinical research. ADR serves as a venue and platform to archive and transfer fundamental design theories, methods, tools and cases. Research areas covered in the journal include: -Design Theory and its Methodology -Design Philosophy, Ethics, Values, and Issues -Design Education -Design Management and Strategy -Sustainability, Culture, History, and Societal Design -Human Behaviors, Perception, and Emotion -Semantics, Aesthetics and Experience in Design -Interaction and Interface Design -Design Tools and New Media -Universal Design/Inclusive Design -Design Creativity -Design Projects and Case Studies