测试研究与诊断研究:临床应用与解读

Sabour S
{"title":"测试研究与诊断研究:临床应用与解读","authors":"Sabour S","doi":"10.26420/austinjpublichealthepidemiol.2022.1128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many published diagnostic studies are better characterized as test research than as diagnostic research [1]. Often these studies include a group of patients with the target disease and a group of patients without this disease in whom the results of the index test are also measured. There is a difference between test research and diagnostic research. The objective of test research is to assess whether a single diagnostic test (index test) adequately can show the presence or absence of a particular disease; however, the aim of diagnostic research is that whether index test appreciably adds to the diagnostic information that is readily available in clinical care [2,3]. Thus, the authors must include all tests that are used to detect disease, and then estimate the added value of index test comparing to other tests. Not with standing its limitations, test research—focusing on estimating the accuracy of a single test may offer relevant information. Most notably, it is helpful in the developmental phase of a new diagnostic test, when the accuracy of the test is yet unknown. Furthermore, test research can be valuable in the realm of screening for a particular disorder in asymptomatic individuals. In this context, no test results other than the single screening test are considered [2].","PeriodicalId":93417,"journal":{"name":"Austin journal of public health and epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Test Research versus Diagnostic Research: Clinical Application and Interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Sabour S\",\"doi\":\"10.26420/austinjpublichealthepidemiol.2022.1128\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many published diagnostic studies are better characterized as test research than as diagnostic research [1]. Often these studies include a group of patients with the target disease and a group of patients without this disease in whom the results of the index test are also measured. There is a difference between test research and diagnostic research. The objective of test research is to assess whether a single diagnostic test (index test) adequately can show the presence or absence of a particular disease; however, the aim of diagnostic research is that whether index test appreciably adds to the diagnostic information that is readily available in clinical care [2,3]. Thus, the authors must include all tests that are used to detect disease, and then estimate the added value of index test comparing to other tests. Not with standing its limitations, test research—focusing on estimating the accuracy of a single test may offer relevant information. Most notably, it is helpful in the developmental phase of a new diagnostic test, when the accuracy of the test is yet unknown. Furthermore, test research can be valuable in the realm of screening for a particular disorder in asymptomatic individuals. In this context, no test results other than the single screening test are considered [2].\",\"PeriodicalId\":93417,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austin journal of public health and epidemiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austin journal of public health and epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpublichealthepidemiol.2022.1128\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austin journal of public health and epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26420/austinjpublichealthepidemiol.2022.1128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多已发表的诊断研究被更好地描述为测试研究,而不是诊断研究[1]。这些研究通常包括一组患有目标疾病的患者和一组没有这种疾病的患者,他们的指数测试结果也被测量。测试研究和诊断研究是有区别的。测试研究的目的是评估单一诊断测试(指数测试)是否足以显示特定疾病的存在或不存在;然而,诊断研究的目的是指标测试是否显著增加了临床护理中现成的诊断信息[2,3]。因此,作者必须包括所有用于检测疾病的测试,然后估计指数测试与其他测试相比的附加值。尽管存在局限性,但专注于评估单个测试准确性的测试研究可能会提供相关信息。最值得注意的是,在新诊断测试的发展阶段,当测试的准确性尚不清楚时,它是有帮助的。此外,测试研究在无症状个体的特定疾病筛查领域可能很有价值。在这种情况下,除了单一筛选测试外,不考虑其他测试结果[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Test Research versus Diagnostic Research: Clinical Application and Interpretation
Many published diagnostic studies are better characterized as test research than as diagnostic research [1]. Often these studies include a group of patients with the target disease and a group of patients without this disease in whom the results of the index test are also measured. There is a difference between test research and diagnostic research. The objective of test research is to assess whether a single diagnostic test (index test) adequately can show the presence or absence of a particular disease; however, the aim of diagnostic research is that whether index test appreciably adds to the diagnostic information that is readily available in clinical care [2,3]. Thus, the authors must include all tests that are used to detect disease, and then estimate the added value of index test comparing to other tests. Not with standing its limitations, test research—focusing on estimating the accuracy of a single test may offer relevant information. Most notably, it is helpful in the developmental phase of a new diagnostic test, when the accuracy of the test is yet unknown. Furthermore, test research can be valuable in the realm of screening for a particular disorder in asymptomatic individuals. In this context, no test results other than the single screening test are considered [2].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Attitudes of Lazarski University Medical Students towards Disaster Medicine; Questionnaire Survey Tuberculosis in Regional Australia: Ectopic Pregnancy Complicating Indolent Genital Tract Disease Paricalcitol Ameliorated Dextran-Sulfate-Sodium-Induced Colitis in Mice through MKP-1/P38 MAPK Signaling Pathway Correlation between Count Score and Cardiovascular Events in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients Optimalresistive Force Selection and Upper Body Contribution in the Assessment of Power during High Intensity Cycle Ergometry: An Unresolved Issue
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1