参与STEM综合项目的学生课堂情绪氛围和态度的性别差异:Rasch分析

IF 1.8 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Research in Science & Technological Education Pub Date : 2021-09-20 DOI:10.1080/02635143.2021.1981852
R. Koul, Felicity I. McLure, B. Fraser
{"title":"参与STEM综合项目的学生课堂情绪氛围和态度的性别差异:Rasch分析","authors":"R. Koul, Felicity I. McLure, B. Fraser","doi":"10.1080/02635143.2021.1981852","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background To address declining enrolments in science and other STEM subjects in high school and university, particularly disproportionately low enrolments of females in physics, engineering and computer sciences, integrated STEM programs are becoming more popular. However, few studies have investigated classroom experiences or gender differences in the effects of participation in integrated STEM projects on students’ attitudes towards continuing to study STEM subjects. Purpose This study compared male and female students’ perceptions of classroom emotional climate and their attitudes towards STEM after completing integrated STEM projects. Methods For a sample of 246 Years 7–10 students participating in integrated STEM projects in 24 co-educational government classrooms, we investigated gender differences using a seven-scale classroom emotional climate questionnaire and an attitude scale. Responses to items in each scale were converted to interval data using Rasch modelling. Differential item functioning between male and female students was investigated and MANOVA was used to compare genders on responses to each scale. Findings When MANOVA was used to identify gender differences in Rasch student measures of each scale, statistically-significant differences of modest magnitude (0.25–0.50 standard deviations) were found for Clarity, Motivation, Consolidation and Attitudes, but not for Care, Control, Challenge and Collaboration. Relative to males, females had more-negative views for each climate and attitude dimension for which differences were significant. Compared with boys, girls were undermotivated by their STEM projects and perceived less clarity of instruction and feedback. Conclusions Greater support for female students through clarifying and giving specific feedback on tasks could improve their perceptions of the classroom emotional climate when carrying out integrated STEM projects. Further research is needed to determine the types of projects that motivate females to study STEM.","PeriodicalId":46656,"journal":{"name":"Research in Science & Technological Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender differences in classroom emotional climate and attitudes among students undertaking integrated STEM projects: a Rasch analysis\",\"authors\":\"R. Koul, Felicity I. McLure, B. Fraser\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02635143.2021.1981852\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background To address declining enrolments in science and other STEM subjects in high school and university, particularly disproportionately low enrolments of females in physics, engineering and computer sciences, integrated STEM programs are becoming more popular. However, few studies have investigated classroom experiences or gender differences in the effects of participation in integrated STEM projects on students’ attitudes towards continuing to study STEM subjects. Purpose This study compared male and female students’ perceptions of classroom emotional climate and their attitudes towards STEM after completing integrated STEM projects. Methods For a sample of 246 Years 7–10 students participating in integrated STEM projects in 24 co-educational government classrooms, we investigated gender differences using a seven-scale classroom emotional climate questionnaire and an attitude scale. Responses to items in each scale were converted to interval data using Rasch modelling. Differential item functioning between male and female students was investigated and MANOVA was used to compare genders on responses to each scale. Findings When MANOVA was used to identify gender differences in Rasch student measures of each scale, statistically-significant differences of modest magnitude (0.25–0.50 standard deviations) were found for Clarity, Motivation, Consolidation and Attitudes, but not for Care, Control, Challenge and Collaboration. Relative to males, females had more-negative views for each climate and attitude dimension for which differences were significant. Compared with boys, girls were undermotivated by their STEM projects and perceived less clarity of instruction and feedback. Conclusions Greater support for female students through clarifying and giving specific feedback on tasks could improve their perceptions of the classroom emotional climate when carrying out integrated STEM projects. Further research is needed to determine the types of projects that motivate females to study STEM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Science & Technological Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1981852\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Science & Technological Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2021.1981852","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

摘要背景为了解决高中和大学科学和其他STEM科目入学率下降的问题,特别是物理、工程和计算机科学领域女性入学率过低的问题,综合STEM项目越来越受欢迎。然而,很少有研究调查课堂经验或性别差异对参与综合STEM项目对学生继续学习STEM科目的态度的影响。目的本研究比较了男女学生在完成综合STEM项目后对课堂情绪氛围的感知和对STEM的态度。方法对246名7-10年级学生在24间男女同校的政府教室中参与综合STEM项目的样本,我们使用七量表课堂情绪氛围问卷和态度量表调查了性别差异。使用Rasch模型将每个量表中项目的响应转换为区间数据。研究了男女学生的项目功能差异,并使用MANOVA对每种量表的性别反应进行了比较。研究结果当使用MANOVA来确定每个量表的Rasch学生测量中的性别差异时,在清晰度、动机、巩固和态度方面发现了中等程度的统计学显著差异(0.25–0.50标准差),但在关怀、控制、挑战和协作方面没有。与男性相比,女性对每个气候和态度维度的负面看法更多,差异显著。与男孩相比,女孩对STEM项目的积极性不足,对指导和反馈的清晰度也较低。结论在实施综合STEM项目时,通过澄清和提供任务的具体反馈,为女学生提供更多的支持,可以改善她们对课堂情绪氛围的感知。需要进一步的研究来确定激励女性学习STEM的项目类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender differences in classroom emotional climate and attitudes among students undertaking integrated STEM projects: a Rasch analysis
ABSTRACT Background To address declining enrolments in science and other STEM subjects in high school and university, particularly disproportionately low enrolments of females in physics, engineering and computer sciences, integrated STEM programs are becoming more popular. However, few studies have investigated classroom experiences or gender differences in the effects of participation in integrated STEM projects on students’ attitudes towards continuing to study STEM subjects. Purpose This study compared male and female students’ perceptions of classroom emotional climate and their attitudes towards STEM after completing integrated STEM projects. Methods For a sample of 246 Years 7–10 students participating in integrated STEM projects in 24 co-educational government classrooms, we investigated gender differences using a seven-scale classroom emotional climate questionnaire and an attitude scale. Responses to items in each scale were converted to interval data using Rasch modelling. Differential item functioning between male and female students was investigated and MANOVA was used to compare genders on responses to each scale. Findings When MANOVA was used to identify gender differences in Rasch student measures of each scale, statistically-significant differences of modest magnitude (0.25–0.50 standard deviations) were found for Clarity, Motivation, Consolidation and Attitudes, but not for Care, Control, Challenge and Collaboration. Relative to males, females had more-negative views for each climate and attitude dimension for which differences were significant. Compared with boys, girls were undermotivated by their STEM projects and perceived less clarity of instruction and feedback. Conclusions Greater support for female students through clarifying and giving specific feedback on tasks could improve their perceptions of the classroom emotional climate when carrying out integrated STEM projects. Further research is needed to determine the types of projects that motivate females to study STEM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Science & Technological Education
Research in Science & Technological Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Navigating the AI-Enhanced STEM education landscape: a decade of insights, trends, and opportunities The science-specific home learning environment of elementary school children – how are science experiences and science talk associated with the children’s science achievement? The impact of 4th grade students’ learning about magnetism through STEM activities on success, 21st century skills, and perspectives From cookbook lab to PEODE-based lab: redesigning lab activities to foster conceptual understanding The early bird gets the worm: age of entry to STEM-related academic education – gender and SES differences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1