共同创造创业机会的效果、因果关系和机器学习

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00355
Daniel Lupp
{"title":"共同创造创业机会的效果、因果关系和机器学习","authors":"Daniel Lupp","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In creating innovative entrepreneurial opportunities, entrepreneurs are characterized by limited information processing capabilities and local search routines that are immanent to humans. Machine learning (ML) offers the opportunity to overcome these limitations while reshaping the innovation process. It is indisputable that ML alone cannot realize entrepreneurial opportunities, but that close collaboration with the human entrepreneur is required. While entrepreneurs usually act according to the principles of effectuation logic in situations of high uncertainty and according to the principles of causation logic in situations of risk, it remains unclear how co-creation with ML affects the entrepreneur's decision-making behavior. By contrasting the functionalities of four different ML paradigms with the principles of the two decision logics, it is shown that supervised ML supports causation logic, while unsupervised and reinforcement ML support effectuation logic in their approach. As a fourth, semi-supervised ML is classified somewhere between effectuation and causation. However, in relation to the situational context of different types of uncertainty, ML may also prove limiting for effectuation by transitioning to causation in the medium-term.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectuation, causation, and machine learning in co-creating entrepreneurial opportunities\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Lupp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jbvi.2022.e00355\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In creating innovative entrepreneurial opportunities, entrepreneurs are characterized by limited information processing capabilities and local search routines that are immanent to humans. Machine learning (ML) offers the opportunity to overcome these limitations while reshaping the innovation process. It is indisputable that ML alone cannot realize entrepreneurial opportunities, but that close collaboration with the human entrepreneur is required. While entrepreneurs usually act according to the principles of effectuation logic in situations of high uncertainty and according to the principles of causation logic in situations of risk, it remains unclear how co-creation with ML affects the entrepreneur's decision-making behavior. By contrasting the functionalities of four different ML paradigms with the principles of the two decision logics, it is shown that supervised ML supports causation logic, while unsupervised and reinforcement ML support effectuation logic in their approach. As a fourth, semi-supervised ML is classified somewhere between effectuation and causation. However, in relation to the situational context of different types of uncertainty, ML may also prove limiting for effectuation by transitioning to causation in the medium-term.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Business Venturing Insights\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673422000531\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352673422000531","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在创造创新的创业机会时,企业家的特点是有限的信息处理能力和人类固有的局部搜索程序。机器学习(ML)在重塑创新过程的同时,提供了克服这些限制的机会。毫无疑问,机器学习本身无法实现创业机会,但需要与人类企业家密切合作。企业家通常在高不确定性的情况下根据效果逻辑原则行事,在风险情况下根据因果逻辑原则行事,但与ML共同创造如何影响企业家的决策行为尚不清楚。通过将四种不同的机器学习范式的功能与两种决策逻辑的原理进行对比,表明监督式机器学习支持因果逻辑,而非监督式和强化式机器学习在其方法中支持效果逻辑。作为第四种,半监督ML被分类在效果和因果关系之间。然而,在不同类型的不确定性的情景背景下,ML在中期过渡到因果关系也可能被证明是有限的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effectuation, causation, and machine learning in co-creating entrepreneurial opportunities

In creating innovative entrepreneurial opportunities, entrepreneurs are characterized by limited information processing capabilities and local search routines that are immanent to humans. Machine learning (ML) offers the opportunity to overcome these limitations while reshaping the innovation process. It is indisputable that ML alone cannot realize entrepreneurial opportunities, but that close collaboration with the human entrepreneur is required. While entrepreneurs usually act according to the principles of effectuation logic in situations of high uncertainty and according to the principles of causation logic in situations of risk, it remains unclear how co-creation with ML affects the entrepreneur's decision-making behavior. By contrasting the functionalities of four different ML paradigms with the principles of the two decision logics, it is shown that supervised ML supports causation logic, while unsupervised and reinforcement ML support effectuation logic in their approach. As a fourth, semi-supervised ML is classified somewhere between effectuation and causation. However, in relation to the situational context of different types of uncertainty, ML may also prove limiting for effectuation by transitioning to causation in the medium-term.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Supporting refugees: An entrepreneurial resourcefulness approach Mirror neurons and neuroplasticity: The dyadic neurological foundations bridging entrepreneur-level and enterprise-level capabilities Exploring inclusivity in entrepreneurship education provision: A European study Stars everywhere: Revealing the prevalence of star performers using empirical data published in entrepreneurship research Extending behavioral theory of the firm to new ventures: Dispositional optimism as a moderating influence on new product introductions in high-tech ventures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1