Inder Marwah,自由主义,多样性和统治:康德,穆勒和差异政府(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2019),第x + 298页。

IF 1.2 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY Utilitas Pub Date : 2022-03-10 DOI:10.1017/S0953820821000431
Inés Valdez
{"title":"Inder Marwah,自由主义,多样性和统治:康德,穆勒和差异政府(剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2019),第x + 298页。","authors":"Inés Valdez","doi":"10.1017/S0953820821000431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Liberalism, Diversity and Domination: Kant, Mill, and the Government of Difference presents a brilliant reconstruction of two canonical thinkers ’ views on racial and cultural diversity, providing a definitive account of the role of anthropology in Kant ’ s system of morality and mining understudied dimensions of Mill ’ s corpus for an account of politics that is culturally pluralist and open to revisiting its own presuppositions. This reconstruction shows that Kant, the thinker who has been repeatedly enlisted to theorize justice by political philosophers, offers a system that is ill fitted to incorporate difference in egalitarian terms and that Mill, while rightly chastised for his hierarchical views of non-Europeans and his own material involvement in colonialism through the British East India Company, is a thinker whose notion of progress is “ contingent, context-dependent, and unpredictable ” (p. 208), lending itself to politics that welcome cultural difference and are less likely to be seduced by certainties of superiority. Despite the highly complex arguments sustained in this book, Marwah ’ s prose is thoroughly readable and rewarding, be it through the masterful piecing together of the anthropological dimensions of Kant ’ s morality – scattered in his essays, lectures, and critical writings – or the careful genealogy of the substantive transformations in Mill ’ s thought, away from the narrow utilitarianism of his father and toward an account of habituation more alert to failure, difference, and education. The introduction sets comparative Kant and Mill the Vis-à-vis contemporary analytical work on global justice, show Kant ’ this his developmental character formation, Kant certain natural predispositions of women and non-whites. literature ’ dismissal of Mill ’ s thought as narrowly utilitarian and/or entanglements","PeriodicalId":45896,"journal":{"name":"Utilitas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inder Marwah, Liberalism, Diversity and Domination: Kant, Mill, and the Government of Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. x + 298.\",\"authors\":\"Inés Valdez\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0953820821000431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Liberalism, Diversity and Domination: Kant, Mill, and the Government of Difference presents a brilliant reconstruction of two canonical thinkers ’ views on racial and cultural diversity, providing a definitive account of the role of anthropology in Kant ’ s system of morality and mining understudied dimensions of Mill ’ s corpus for an account of politics that is culturally pluralist and open to revisiting its own presuppositions. This reconstruction shows that Kant, the thinker who has been repeatedly enlisted to theorize justice by political philosophers, offers a system that is ill fitted to incorporate difference in egalitarian terms and that Mill, while rightly chastised for his hierarchical views of non-Europeans and his own material involvement in colonialism through the British East India Company, is a thinker whose notion of progress is “ contingent, context-dependent, and unpredictable ” (p. 208), lending itself to politics that welcome cultural difference and are less likely to be seduced by certainties of superiority. Despite the highly complex arguments sustained in this book, Marwah ’ s prose is thoroughly readable and rewarding, be it through the masterful piecing together of the anthropological dimensions of Kant ’ s morality – scattered in his essays, lectures, and critical writings – or the careful genealogy of the substantive transformations in Mill ’ s thought, away from the narrow utilitarianism of his father and toward an account of habituation more alert to failure, difference, and education. The introduction sets comparative Kant and Mill the Vis-à-vis contemporary analytical work on global justice, show Kant ’ this his developmental character formation, Kant certain natural predispositions of women and non-whites. literature ’ dismissal of Mill ’ s thought as narrowly utilitarian and/or entanglements\",\"PeriodicalId\":45896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Utilitas\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Utilitas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000431\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utilitas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0953820821000431","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《自由主义、多样性和统治:康德、密尔和差异政府》对两位权威思想家关于种族和文化多样性的观点进行了精彩的重构,为人类学在康德道德体系中的作用提供了明确的说明,并挖掘了密尔语料中未被研究的维度,以解释文化多元主义的政治,并对重新审视自己的预设持开放态度。这种重构表明,康德,这位被政治哲学家反复引用来将正义理论化的思想家,提供了一个不适合在平等主义术语中纳入差异的体系,而密尔,虽然因为他对非欧洲人的等级观点和他自己通过英国东印度公司参与殖民主义的物质参与而受到正确的惩罚,是一个思想家,他的进步概念是“偶然的,情境依赖的,不可预测的”(第208页)。这有利于那些欢迎文化差异、不太可能被肯定的优越感所诱惑的政治。尽管这本书,高度复杂的争论持续Marwah”年代散文是完全可读的和有益的,通过娴熟的拼凑人类学维度康德的道德——分散在他的随笔,讲座,和批判性著作或实质性的小心家谱转换轧机的思想,远离他父亲的狭隘的功利主义和向一个帐户的习惯更警惕失败,差异,和教育。引言将比较康德和穆勒的Vis-à-vis当代全球正义的分析工作,展示康德这一他的发展性格的形成,康德对女性和非白人的某些自然倾向。文学对密尔思想狭隘功利和/或纠缠的否定
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inder Marwah, Liberalism, Diversity and Domination: Kant, Mill, and the Government of Difference (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019), pp. x + 298.
Liberalism, Diversity and Domination: Kant, Mill, and the Government of Difference presents a brilliant reconstruction of two canonical thinkers ’ views on racial and cultural diversity, providing a definitive account of the role of anthropology in Kant ’ s system of morality and mining understudied dimensions of Mill ’ s corpus for an account of politics that is culturally pluralist and open to revisiting its own presuppositions. This reconstruction shows that Kant, the thinker who has been repeatedly enlisted to theorize justice by political philosophers, offers a system that is ill fitted to incorporate difference in egalitarian terms and that Mill, while rightly chastised for his hierarchical views of non-Europeans and his own material involvement in colonialism through the British East India Company, is a thinker whose notion of progress is “ contingent, context-dependent, and unpredictable ” (p. 208), lending itself to politics that welcome cultural difference and are less likely to be seduced by certainties of superiority. Despite the highly complex arguments sustained in this book, Marwah ’ s prose is thoroughly readable and rewarding, be it through the masterful piecing together of the anthropological dimensions of Kant ’ s morality – scattered in his essays, lectures, and critical writings – or the careful genealogy of the substantive transformations in Mill ’ s thought, away from the narrow utilitarianism of his father and toward an account of habituation more alert to failure, difference, and education. The introduction sets comparative Kant and Mill the Vis-à-vis contemporary analytical work on global justice, show Kant ’ this his developmental character formation, Kant certain natural predispositions of women and non-whites. literature ’ dismissal of Mill ’ s thought as narrowly utilitarian and/or entanglements
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Utilitas
Utilitas PHILOSOPHY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Classic Hedonism Reconsidered Partial Aggregation for Prioritarians Posthumous Harm and Changing Desires Does the Patterned View Avoid the Ideal Worlds Objection? Toni Rønnow-Rasmussen, The Value Gap (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2022), pp. xv + 215.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1