说话棒学习模式对大学预科生口语能力的影响有多显著?

Loviniantika Cahyaning Suseno, H. Haryanto, Siti Anafiah
{"title":"说话棒学习模式对大学预科生口语能力的影响有多显著?","authors":"Loviniantika Cahyaning Suseno, H. Haryanto, Siti Anafiah","doi":"10.17977/UM048V26I2P66-72","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify differences in the PGSD students’ speaking skills with and without talking stick learning model. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The population was all students in the 4th semester with a total of 324 students. It involved 78 sample students selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using speaking tests, observations, and interviews. The collected data were then analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. The result showed the Sig value of 0.000 which is lower than 0.05 and the average improvement in speaking skills of the experimental group is higher than the control groups. In conclusion, there are significant differences between students who received the talking stick learning model and those who did not","PeriodicalId":30895,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Talking Stick Learning Model, How Significant Has the Impact on the PGSD Students’ Speaking Skills?\",\"authors\":\"Loviniantika Cahyaning Suseno, H. Haryanto, Siti Anafiah\",\"doi\":\"10.17977/UM048V26I2P66-72\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to identify differences in the PGSD students’ speaking skills with and without talking stick learning model. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The population was all students in the 4th semester with a total of 324 students. It involved 78 sample students selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using speaking tests, observations, and interviews. The collected data were then analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. The result showed the Sig value of 0.000 which is lower than 0.05 and the average improvement in speaking skills of the experimental group is higher than the control groups. In conclusion, there are significant differences between students who received the talking stick learning model and those who did not\",\"PeriodicalId\":30895,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM048V26I2P66-72\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17977/UM048V26I2P66-72","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在使用和不使用说话棒学习模式下,大学预科生口语能力的差异。本研究采用准实验设计的定量方法。人口均为第四学期的学生,共324人。它涉及78个样本学生选择使用有目的抽样。数据是通过口语测试、观察和访谈收集的。然后使用曼-惠特尼检验分析收集到的数据。结果显示,Sig值为0.000,低于0.05,实验组口语技能的平均提高高于对照组。综上所述,接受手杖学习模式的学生与未接受手杖学习模式的学生之间存在显著差异
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Talking Stick Learning Model, How Significant Has the Impact on the PGSD Students’ Speaking Skills?
This study aims to identify differences in the PGSD students’ speaking skills with and without talking stick learning model. This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design. The population was all students in the 4th semester with a total of 324 students. It involved 78 sample students selected using purposive sampling. Data were collected using speaking tests, observations, and interviews. The collected data were then analyzed using the Mann Whitney test. The result showed the Sig value of 0.000 which is lower than 0.05 and the average improvement in speaking skills of the experimental group is higher than the control groups. In conclusion, there are significant differences between students who received the talking stick learning model and those who did not
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Heutagogy Model of Learning Innovation in Increasing The Skill Needs of The Digital Era of Vocational Students Exploring Student Engagement in Online Learning Ethnopedagogy of STAI Denpasar Bali in Juz 30 Memorizing Course Balinese Language Translation: Actualization of Local Wisdom Values Demystifying International Publications: A Structured Training Model to Facilitate UIN SU Lecturers Vocabulary Learning Strategies Employed by Indonesian Virtual Exchange Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1