当你的病人有开放性眼球损伤时的决策

IF 0.9 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY Expert Review of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2022-07-04 DOI:10.1080/17469899.2022.2124969
F. Kuhn
{"title":"当你的病人有开放性眼球损伤时的决策","authors":"F. Kuhn","doi":"10.1080/17469899.2022.2124969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is not a pretty picture. Today we have the finest tools for diagnostics and a full armamentarium of therapeutics including intraocular drugs, temporary keratoprosetheses (TKP), vitrectomy equipment and instruments; yet more and more patients find out that what determines their fate is indeed fate. Does the facility where s/he is taken keep its operationroom doors open afterhours? Even if yes, is the available staff well trained and all necessary tools accessible? In this publication I summarize my personal opinion regarding the decisions to be made for patients presenting with an open globe injury (OGI) – assuming that the facility is a 24/7 one with all the required logistics/infrastructure being optimal. This also means that the physician to make the decisions and perform the surgery is not an untrained, young resident (as unfortunately so often the case is) but a surgeon experienced in both ‘segments’ of the eye: i.e. a vitreoretinal specialist. If these criteria are not fulfilled, it may be preferable to transport/refer the patient to a different facility where conditions allow optimal treatment. Roughly half of eyes with an OGI require surgery on the posterior segment; if these pathologies cannot be addressed by the surgeon closing the wound, the delay may lead to irreversible damage.","PeriodicalId":39989,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","volume":"17 1","pages":"227 - 229"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decision-making when your patient has an open globe injury\",\"authors\":\"F. Kuhn\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17469899.2022.2124969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is not a pretty picture. Today we have the finest tools for diagnostics and a full armamentarium of therapeutics including intraocular drugs, temporary keratoprosetheses (TKP), vitrectomy equipment and instruments; yet more and more patients find out that what determines their fate is indeed fate. Does the facility where s/he is taken keep its operationroom doors open afterhours? Even if yes, is the available staff well trained and all necessary tools accessible? In this publication I summarize my personal opinion regarding the decisions to be made for patients presenting with an open globe injury (OGI) – assuming that the facility is a 24/7 one with all the required logistics/infrastructure being optimal. This also means that the physician to make the decisions and perform the surgery is not an untrained, young resident (as unfortunately so often the case is) but a surgeon experienced in both ‘segments’ of the eye: i.e. a vitreoretinal specialist. If these criteria are not fulfilled, it may be preferable to transport/refer the patient to a different facility where conditions allow optimal treatment. Roughly half of eyes with an OGI require surgery on the posterior segment; if these pathologies cannot be addressed by the surgeon closing the wound, the delay may lead to irreversible damage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Expert Review of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"227 - 229\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Expert Review of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2124969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17469899.2022.2124969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这不是一幅美好的图景。今天,我们拥有最好的诊断工具和全套治疗手段,包括眼内药物、临时角膜假体(TKP)、玻璃体切割设备和仪器;然而,越来越多的病人发现,决定他们命运的确实是命运。他/她所在的工厂是否在下班后保持操作室的门开着?即使是,可用的员工是否受过良好的培训,所有必要的工具是否可用?在这篇文章中,我总结了我个人对开放性球体损伤(OGI)患者的决定的看法——假设该设施是全天候的,所有所需的后勤/基础设施都是最佳的。这也意味着做决定和实施手术的医生不是一个未经训练的年轻住院医生(不幸的是,这种情况经常发生),而是一个在眼睛的两个“部分”都有经验的外科医生:即玻璃体视网膜专家。如果不符合这些标准,最好将患者转移/转诊到条件允许最佳治疗的其他机构。大约一半的OGI眼睛需要在后段进行手术;如果这些病理不能通过外科医生闭合伤口来解决,延误可能导致不可逆转的损伤。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decision-making when your patient has an open globe injury
It is not a pretty picture. Today we have the finest tools for diagnostics and a full armamentarium of therapeutics including intraocular drugs, temporary keratoprosetheses (TKP), vitrectomy equipment and instruments; yet more and more patients find out that what determines their fate is indeed fate. Does the facility where s/he is taken keep its operationroom doors open afterhours? Even if yes, is the available staff well trained and all necessary tools accessible? In this publication I summarize my personal opinion regarding the decisions to be made for patients presenting with an open globe injury (OGI) – assuming that the facility is a 24/7 one with all the required logistics/infrastructure being optimal. This also means that the physician to make the decisions and perform the surgery is not an untrained, young resident (as unfortunately so often the case is) but a surgeon experienced in both ‘segments’ of the eye: i.e. a vitreoretinal specialist. If these criteria are not fulfilled, it may be preferable to transport/refer the patient to a different facility where conditions allow optimal treatment. Roughly half of eyes with an OGI require surgery on the posterior segment; if these pathologies cannot be addressed by the surgeon closing the wound, the delay may lead to irreversible damage.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Expert Review of Ophthalmology
Expert Review of Ophthalmology Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
期刊介绍: The worldwide problem of visual impairment is set to increase, as we are seeing increased longevity in developed countries. This will produce a crisis in vision care unless concerted action is taken. The substantial value that ophthalmic interventions confer to patients with eye diseases has led to intense research efforts in this area in recent years, with corresponding improvements in treatment, ophthalmic instrumentation and surgical techniques. As a result, the future for ophthalmology holds great promise as further exciting and innovative developments unfold.
期刊最新文献
How Genome-Wide Association Studies Transform Care for Patients at Risk of Glaucoma. Systemic and Ocular Associations of Keratoconus. Spaceflight associated neuro-ocular syndrome (SANS): a systematic review, implications for the sans case definition Stem cell therapy in retinal diseases: current evidence Morphometric analysis of orbital CT scan in a Jordanian sample
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1