理解当代艺术中的观众参与

H. Liedke
{"title":"理解当代艺术中的观众参与","authors":"H. Liedke","doi":"10.1080/14794713.2021.1981040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"artists is often when the book is at its best, as readers can experience the processes that went into the development of different artistic works. The text is brought to a conclusion with an engaging piece by Chris Clarke who works as an art curator and explores the challenges he has faced in adapting spaces that are often focused on contemporary art forms to be able to properly showcase digital art. Clarke also challenges a misconception that online exhibitions remove artistic gatekeepers and argues that the online world may have ‘invisible’ (140) gatekeepers who are even more controlling. The book offers a deep dive practitioner-led exploration into digital art in Ireland that should prove an invaluable read to anyone interested in the genre and its major events since the turn of the century. Two issues which arise when reading this book though are firstly, that it sometimes feels too insular in presenting a field of study that is quite small and, secondly, that the book was written before the Covid-19 pandemic and, therefore, is not able to comment on the changing ways audiences are interacting with digital art. However, these issues do not necessarily detract from the overall purpose of the text. Contributors to the book themselves note that the field largely comprises of a small community of artist–researchers. In the book, contributors often discuss the work of other contributors and this overlap risks presenting an insular view of digital art in Ireland. However, considering this is a study of a small but growing artistic field, Digital Art in Ireland succeeds in covering the most significant events in Ireland’s digital art scene without leaving out much. Moreover, contributors approach the work from different angles and disagree with each other in certain instances. The fact this volume was written before the Covid-19 pandemic makes it feel slightly dated, as the ways in which audiences interact with art presented digitally are changing drastically as a result of the pandemic. Yet, there is something powerful in a text that captures a movement up to the point of significant change. This text can act as both a historical account of digital art in Ireland in pre-Covid times and a theoretical foundation for the work that now needs to be done to investigate audiences’ relationship with the digital in light of the pandemic.","PeriodicalId":38661,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Understanding Audience Engagement in the Contemporary Arts\",\"authors\":\"H. Liedke\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14794713.2021.1981040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"artists is often when the book is at its best, as readers can experience the processes that went into the development of different artistic works. The text is brought to a conclusion with an engaging piece by Chris Clarke who works as an art curator and explores the challenges he has faced in adapting spaces that are often focused on contemporary art forms to be able to properly showcase digital art. Clarke also challenges a misconception that online exhibitions remove artistic gatekeepers and argues that the online world may have ‘invisible’ (140) gatekeepers who are even more controlling. The book offers a deep dive practitioner-led exploration into digital art in Ireland that should prove an invaluable read to anyone interested in the genre and its major events since the turn of the century. Two issues which arise when reading this book though are firstly, that it sometimes feels too insular in presenting a field of study that is quite small and, secondly, that the book was written before the Covid-19 pandemic and, therefore, is not able to comment on the changing ways audiences are interacting with digital art. However, these issues do not necessarily detract from the overall purpose of the text. Contributors to the book themselves note that the field largely comprises of a small community of artist–researchers. In the book, contributors often discuss the work of other contributors and this overlap risks presenting an insular view of digital art in Ireland. However, considering this is a study of a small but growing artistic field, Digital Art in Ireland succeeds in covering the most significant events in Ireland’s digital art scene without leaving out much. Moreover, contributors approach the work from different angles and disagree with each other in certain instances. The fact this volume was written before the Covid-19 pandemic makes it feel slightly dated, as the ways in which audiences interact with art presented digitally are changing drastically as a result of the pandemic. Yet, there is something powerful in a text that captures a movement up to the point of significant change. This text can act as both a historical account of digital art in Ireland in pre-Covid times and a theoretical foundation for the work that now needs to be done to investigate audiences’ relationship with the digital in light of the pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2021.1981040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14794713.2021.1981040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

艺术家往往是这本书最好的时候,因为读者可以体验到不同艺术作品的发展过程。本文以艺术策展人克里斯·克拉克(Chris Clarke)的一篇引人入胜的作品结束,他探讨了自己在调整经常关注当代艺术形式的空间以正确展示数字艺术方面所面临的挑战。克拉克还质疑了一种误解,即在线展览取消了艺术看门人,并认为网络世界可能有“隐形”(140)看门人,他们更具控制力。这本书提供了一个由从业者主导的对爱尔兰数字艺术的深入探索,对于任何对该流派及其世纪之交以来的重大事件感兴趣的人来说,这本书都是一本宝贵的读物。然而,在阅读这本书时会出现两个问题:第一,它有时在呈现一个相当小的研究领域时感觉过于孤立;第二,这本书是在新冠肺炎大流行之前写的,因此无法评论观众与数字艺术互动方式的变化。然而,这些问题并不一定有损于案文的总体目的。该书的撰稿人自己也指出,该领域主要由一个由艺术家和研究人员组成的小团体组成。在书中,撰稿人经常讨论其他撰稿人的作品,这种重叠可能会对爱尔兰的数字艺术产生狭隘的看法。然而,考虑到这是一个小型但不断发展的艺术领域的研究,《爱尔兰数字艺术》成功地涵盖了爱尔兰数字艺术领域中最重要的事件,没有遗漏太多。此外,贡献者从不同的角度处理工作,在某些情况下彼此意见相左。这本书是在新冠肺炎大流行之前写的,这让人觉得有点过时,因为观众与数字呈现的艺术互动的方式因大流行而发生了巨大变化。然而,文本中有一些强大的东西,它捕捉到了一场运动,直到发生重大变化。这篇文本既可以作为新冠疫情前爱尔兰数字艺术的历史记录,也可以作为研究观众与数字之间关系的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Understanding Audience Engagement in the Contemporary Arts
artists is often when the book is at its best, as readers can experience the processes that went into the development of different artistic works. The text is brought to a conclusion with an engaging piece by Chris Clarke who works as an art curator and explores the challenges he has faced in adapting spaces that are often focused on contemporary art forms to be able to properly showcase digital art. Clarke also challenges a misconception that online exhibitions remove artistic gatekeepers and argues that the online world may have ‘invisible’ (140) gatekeepers who are even more controlling. The book offers a deep dive practitioner-led exploration into digital art in Ireland that should prove an invaluable read to anyone interested in the genre and its major events since the turn of the century. Two issues which arise when reading this book though are firstly, that it sometimes feels too insular in presenting a field of study that is quite small and, secondly, that the book was written before the Covid-19 pandemic and, therefore, is not able to comment on the changing ways audiences are interacting with digital art. However, these issues do not necessarily detract from the overall purpose of the text. Contributors to the book themselves note that the field largely comprises of a small community of artist–researchers. In the book, contributors often discuss the work of other contributors and this overlap risks presenting an insular view of digital art in Ireland. However, considering this is a study of a small but growing artistic field, Digital Art in Ireland succeeds in covering the most significant events in Ireland’s digital art scene without leaving out much. Moreover, contributors approach the work from different angles and disagree with each other in certain instances. The fact this volume was written before the Covid-19 pandemic makes it feel slightly dated, as the ways in which audiences interact with art presented digitally are changing drastically as a result of the pandemic. Yet, there is something powerful in a text that captures a movement up to the point of significant change. This text can act as both a historical account of digital art in Ireland in pre-Covid times and a theoretical foundation for the work that now needs to be done to investigate audiences’ relationship with the digital in light of the pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media
International Journal of Performance Arts and Digital Media Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Live performance in digital environments The Nāṭyaśāstra and virtual metatheatre Ambiguous devices as an example of a networked relational encounter Exploring the impact of machine learning on dance performance: a systematic review ‘Tele_Trust’ and ‘Touch My Touch’: co-creating social touch and trust experience through telematic platforms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1