Jordan C Smith, Robert Klug, Thomas Dagg, Elizabeth Lewis, Paul Cleland, Andrew S T Porter, Samuel Ofei-Dodoo
{"title":"COVID-19对大学运动员的学术影响","authors":"Jordan C Smith, Robert Klug, Thomas Dagg, Elizabeth Lewis, Paul Cleland, Andrew S T Porter, Samuel Ofei-Dodoo","doi":"10.17161/kjm.vol15.16327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused a pause to nearly all sporting activities in the spring of 2020, and collegiate athletes at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-affiliated universities whose sporting seasons were affected by the pandemic were granted an extra year of athletic eligibility. This study was conducted to determine how collegiate athletes planned to use an additional year of eligibility granted by the NCAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 632 athletes from two universities in the Midwestern United States, between August and September 2021. The athletes completed an anonymous, nine-item survey to assess the effect of the pandemic on the athletic season, athletic eligibility, and potential change in an academic or professional career. Chi-square tests, generalized linear mixed models, and adjusted odds ratio were used for the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participation rate was 74.5% (471 of 632). Nearly 63% (290 of 461) of the athletes received an additional year of eligibility because of the pandemic, with 193 (66.6%) planned to use their extra year for scholastic development. Male athletes (65.3% vs. 34.7%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 11.66, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.20), Division II athletes (59.6% vs. 40.4%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 13.93, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.22), and athletes who had not previously used redshirt (73.1% vs. 26.9%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 4.79, p = 0.029, Φ = 0.32) where more likely to use their extra year of eligibility academically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that most of the athletes planned to use their extra year of eligibility to pursue further scholastic or professional development, highlighting the positive part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should investigate how these findings relate to athletes from universities in different geographical locations and intra-division schools.</p>","PeriodicalId":94121,"journal":{"name":"Kansas journal of medicine","volume":"15 1","pages":"101-105"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942400/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Academic Impact of COVID-19 in Collegiate Athletes.\",\"authors\":\"Jordan C Smith, Robert Klug, Thomas Dagg, Elizabeth Lewis, Paul Cleland, Andrew S T Porter, Samuel Ofei-Dodoo\",\"doi\":\"10.17161/kjm.vol15.16327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic caused a pause to nearly all sporting activities in the spring of 2020, and collegiate athletes at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-affiliated universities whose sporting seasons were affected by the pandemic were granted an extra year of athletic eligibility. This study was conducted to determine how collegiate athletes planned to use an additional year of eligibility granted by the NCAA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 632 athletes from two universities in the Midwestern United States, between August and September 2021. The athletes completed an anonymous, nine-item survey to assess the effect of the pandemic on the athletic season, athletic eligibility, and potential change in an academic or professional career. Chi-square tests, generalized linear mixed models, and adjusted odds ratio were used for the analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The participation rate was 74.5% (471 of 632). Nearly 63% (290 of 461) of the athletes received an additional year of eligibility because of the pandemic, with 193 (66.6%) planned to use their extra year for scholastic development. Male athletes (65.3% vs. 34.7%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 11.66, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.20), Division II athletes (59.6% vs. 40.4%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 13.93, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.22), and athletes who had not previously used redshirt (73.1% vs. 26.9%; χ<sup>2</sup>[1, n = 290] = 4.79, p = 0.029, Φ = 0.32) where more likely to use their extra year of eligibility academically.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggested that most of the athletes planned to use their extra year of eligibility to pursue further scholastic or professional development, highlighting the positive part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should investigate how these findings relate to athletes from universities in different geographical locations and intra-division schools.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94121,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"101-105\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8942400/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kansas journal of medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kansas journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17161/kjm.vol15.16327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
2019冠状病毒病大流行导致2020年春季几乎所有体育活动暂停,全国大学体育协会(NCAA)附属大学的大学生运动员的运动季节受到大流行的影响,他们获得了额外一年的运动资格。这项研究是为了确定大学生运动员计划如何利用NCAA授予的额外一年的资格。方法:作者在2021年8月至9月期间对来自美国中西部两所大学的632名运动员进行了横断面调查。运动员们完成了一项包含9个项目的匿名调查,以评估疫情对运动季节、运动资格以及学术或职业生涯的潜在变化的影响。采用卡方检验、广义线性混合模型和校正优势比进行分析。结果632例患者中有471例参加,参评率为74.5%。由于大流行,近63%(461名运动员中的290名)的运动员获得了额外一年的资格,其中193名(66.6%)计划将额外的一年用于学业发展。男运动员(65.3% vs. 34.7%;χ2[1, n = 290] = 11.66, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.20),乙级运动员(59.6% vs. 40.4%;χ2[1, n = 290] = 13.93, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.22),未穿过红衫的运动员(73.1% vs. 26.9%;χ2[1, n = 290] = 4.79, p = 0.029, Φ = 0.32),更有可能在学业上使用他们额外一年的资格。我们的研究结果表明,大多数运动员计划利用他们额外的一年资格来进一步追求学术或专业发展,这突出了COVID-19大流行的积极一面。未来的研究应该调查这些发现与来自不同地理位置的大学和校内学校的运动员之间的关系。
Academic Impact of COVID-19 in Collegiate Athletes.
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic caused a pause to nearly all sporting activities in the spring of 2020, and collegiate athletes at the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA)-affiliated universities whose sporting seasons were affected by the pandemic were granted an extra year of athletic eligibility. This study was conducted to determine how collegiate athletes planned to use an additional year of eligibility granted by the NCAA.
Methods: The authors conducted a cross-sectional survey of 632 athletes from two universities in the Midwestern United States, between August and September 2021. The athletes completed an anonymous, nine-item survey to assess the effect of the pandemic on the athletic season, athletic eligibility, and potential change in an academic or professional career. Chi-square tests, generalized linear mixed models, and adjusted odds ratio were used for the analyses.
Results: The participation rate was 74.5% (471 of 632). Nearly 63% (290 of 461) of the athletes received an additional year of eligibility because of the pandemic, with 193 (66.6%) planned to use their extra year for scholastic development. Male athletes (65.3% vs. 34.7%; χ2[1, n = 290] = 11.66, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.20), Division II athletes (59.6% vs. 40.4%; χ2[1, n = 290] = 13.93, p < 0.001, Φ = 0.22), and athletes who had not previously used redshirt (73.1% vs. 26.9%; χ2[1, n = 290] = 4.79, p = 0.029, Φ = 0.32) where more likely to use their extra year of eligibility academically.
Conclusions: Our findings suggested that most of the athletes planned to use their extra year of eligibility to pursue further scholastic or professional development, highlighting the positive part of the COVID-19 pandemic. Future studies should investigate how these findings relate to athletes from universities in different geographical locations and intra-division schools.