韩国生母与跨国收养实践:虚拟母亲(作者:Hosu Kim)

IF 0.7 3区 社会学 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Korean Studies Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1215/07311613-8552084
S. Bae
{"title":"韩国生母与跨国收养实践:虚拟母亲(作者:Hosu Kim)","authors":"S. Bae","doi":"10.1215/07311613-8552084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research within adoption studies initially focused primarily on the practice of adoption and its outcomes. The scholars producing early adoption-related research, mostly within the disciplines of social work and psychology, were often adoption social workers or adoptive parents themselves. As a response to research that seemed to replicate power differentials across the “adoption constellation,” critical adoption scholars have instead produced scholarship that reveals the structural and social processes embedded in its practice. Using interdisciplinary approaches from feminist, postcolonial, geopolitical, biopolitical, critical race, and queer theory, critical adoption scholars have sought to complicate widely accepted notions of family, kinship, race, identity, humanitarianism, citizenship, and transnationalism. From within this emergent field of study, Hosu Kim’s book Birth Mothers and Transnational Adoption Practice in South Korea: Virtual Mothering importantly fills a glaring void. Although notable scholarship within the field has illuminated the geopolitics, structural inequalities, and gendered violence that render children adoptable, and has given a voice to the lived experiences of those adopted, there was a lack of scholastic inquiry on birth mothers. Kim’s “discursive-material-affective” (15) examination of four different sites— maternity homes, television search-and-reunion shows, a birth mothers’ internet forum, and an oral history collection—breaks new ground, challenging what she calls the “two divergent figures” (3) of birth mothers in South Korea. Although her research outlines the processes by which birth mothers become both legally erased and socially dead, citing Foucault’s heterotopia, Kim cites","PeriodicalId":43322,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Birth Mothers and Transnational Adoption Practice in South Korea: Virtual Mothering by Hosu Kim (review)\",\"authors\":\"S. Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/07311613-8552084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research within adoption studies initially focused primarily on the practice of adoption and its outcomes. The scholars producing early adoption-related research, mostly within the disciplines of social work and psychology, were often adoption social workers or adoptive parents themselves. As a response to research that seemed to replicate power differentials across the “adoption constellation,” critical adoption scholars have instead produced scholarship that reveals the structural and social processes embedded in its practice. Using interdisciplinary approaches from feminist, postcolonial, geopolitical, biopolitical, critical race, and queer theory, critical adoption scholars have sought to complicate widely accepted notions of family, kinship, race, identity, humanitarianism, citizenship, and transnationalism. From within this emergent field of study, Hosu Kim’s book Birth Mothers and Transnational Adoption Practice in South Korea: Virtual Mothering importantly fills a glaring void. Although notable scholarship within the field has illuminated the geopolitics, structural inequalities, and gendered violence that render children adoptable, and has given a voice to the lived experiences of those adopted, there was a lack of scholastic inquiry on birth mothers. Kim’s “discursive-material-affective” (15) examination of four different sites— maternity homes, television search-and-reunion shows, a birth mothers’ internet forum, and an oral history collection—breaks new ground, challenging what she calls the “two divergent figures” (3) of birth mothers in South Korea. Although her research outlines the processes by which birth mothers become both legally erased and socially dead, citing Foucault’s heterotopia, Kim cites\",\"PeriodicalId\":43322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Korean Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-8552084\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07311613-8552084","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

收养研究中的研究最初主要集中在收养的实践及其结果上。从事早期收养相关研究的学者大多来自社会工作和心理学领域,他们往往是收养社会工作者或养父母本人。作为对似乎复制了“收养星座”中权力差异的研究的回应,批判收养的学者们反而产生了揭示其实践中嵌入的结构和社会过程的学术研究。利用跨学科的方法,从女权主义、后殖民、地缘政治、生物政治、批判种族和酷儿理论,批判收养学者试图使广泛接受的家庭、亲属、种族、身份、人道主义、公民和跨国主义的概念复杂化。从这个新兴的研究领域来看,Hosu Kim的书《韩国的生母和跨国收养实践:虚拟母亲》填补了一个明显的空白。尽管该领域的著名学者已经阐明了地缘政治、结构性不平等和性别暴力等导致儿童被收养的因素,并为被收养者的生活经历提供了发言权,但对生母的学术研究却很缺乏。金的“话语-物质-情感”考察了四个不同的地点——产妇之家、电视搜索与团聚节目、生母网络论坛和口述历史收藏——开辟了新的领域,挑战了她所说的韩国生母的“两种不同的形象”。虽然她的研究概述了生母在法律上被抹去,在社会上死亡的过程,引用福柯的异托邦,金引用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Birth Mothers and Transnational Adoption Practice in South Korea: Virtual Mothering by Hosu Kim (review)
Research within adoption studies initially focused primarily on the practice of adoption and its outcomes. The scholars producing early adoption-related research, mostly within the disciplines of social work and psychology, were often adoption social workers or adoptive parents themselves. As a response to research that seemed to replicate power differentials across the “adoption constellation,” critical adoption scholars have instead produced scholarship that reveals the structural and social processes embedded in its practice. Using interdisciplinary approaches from feminist, postcolonial, geopolitical, biopolitical, critical race, and queer theory, critical adoption scholars have sought to complicate widely accepted notions of family, kinship, race, identity, humanitarianism, citizenship, and transnationalism. From within this emergent field of study, Hosu Kim’s book Birth Mothers and Transnational Adoption Practice in South Korea: Virtual Mothering importantly fills a glaring void. Although notable scholarship within the field has illuminated the geopolitics, structural inequalities, and gendered violence that render children adoptable, and has given a voice to the lived experiences of those adopted, there was a lack of scholastic inquiry on birth mothers. Kim’s “discursive-material-affective” (15) examination of four different sites— maternity homes, television search-and-reunion shows, a birth mothers’ internet forum, and an oral history collection—breaks new ground, challenging what she calls the “two divergent figures” (3) of birth mothers in South Korea. Although her research outlines the processes by which birth mothers become both legally erased and socially dead, citing Foucault’s heterotopia, Kim cites
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Editorial Note Gender Politics at Home and Abroad: Protestant Modernity in Colonial-Era Korea Traffic in Asian Women Kinship Novels of Early Modern Korea: Between Genealogical Time and the Domestic Everyday by Ksenia Chizhova (review) Social (Im)mobility and Bureaucratic Failings: Family Background and the Sŏngbun System in North Korea
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1