用最佳-最差尺度法评估意大利人对山地牛肉生产的偏好

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Mountain Research and Development Pub Date : 2022-06-30 DOI:10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00021.1
Mikaela Linder, K. Sidali, C. Fischer, M. Gauly, G. Busch
{"title":"用最佳-最差尺度法评估意大利人对山地牛肉生产的偏好","authors":"Mikaela Linder, K. Sidali, C. Fischer, M. Gauly, G. Busch","doi":"10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00021.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The European Union (EU) regulation on mountain food products represents a great opportunity for beef producers in mountain areas, particularly as the quality-certified food has received more attention from European consumers in recent years. However, for a food-quality system—such as the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme—to be effective, the regulation standards must meet consumer expectations. In Italy, there are few studies on consumer preferences regarding beef and none focused on meat produced in mountain areas. To help fill this gap, this study assessed the preferences of Italian citizens for attributes associated with beef produced in mountain areas and contrasted the results with the EU regulation on mountain food products. Furthermore, factors that explain the heterogeneity of Italians' preferences regarding beef production attributes were analyzed. Data were collected online using a consumer panel, and a best–worst scaling method and latent class analysis were used. The results indicate that Italians expect mountain beef to be healthier and produced according to higher animal welfare standards. Such preferences reveal the existence of a gap between what Italians expect and the quality standards of the EU regulation on mountain food products, a situation that may jeopardize the objectives of the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme.","PeriodicalId":49793,"journal":{"name":"Mountain Research and Development","volume":"42 1","pages":"R8 - R15"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Italians' Preferences for Mountain Beef Production Using a Best–Worst Scaling Approach\",\"authors\":\"Mikaela Linder, K. Sidali, C. Fischer, M. Gauly, G. Busch\",\"doi\":\"10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00021.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The European Union (EU) regulation on mountain food products represents a great opportunity for beef producers in mountain areas, particularly as the quality-certified food has received more attention from European consumers in recent years. However, for a food-quality system—such as the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme—to be effective, the regulation standards must meet consumer expectations. In Italy, there are few studies on consumer preferences regarding beef and none focused on meat produced in mountain areas. To help fill this gap, this study assessed the preferences of Italian citizens for attributes associated with beef produced in mountain areas and contrasted the results with the EU regulation on mountain food products. Furthermore, factors that explain the heterogeneity of Italians' preferences regarding beef production attributes were analyzed. Data were collected online using a consumer panel, and a best–worst scaling method and latent class analysis were used. The results indicate that Italians expect mountain beef to be healthier and produced according to higher animal welfare standards. Such preferences reveal the existence of a gap between what Italians expect and the quality standards of the EU regulation on mountain food products, a situation that may jeopardize the objectives of the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49793,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"R8 - R15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mountain Research and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00021.1\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mountain Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1659/MRD-JOURNAL-D-21-00021.1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

欧洲联盟(欧盟)对山区食品的监管为山区牛肉生产商提供了一个巨大的机会,特别是近年来,经过质量认证的食品越来越受到欧洲消费者的关注。然而,要使食品质量体系(如欧盟委员会的山区标签计划)有效,监管标准必须满足消费者的期望。在意大利,很少有关于消费者对牛肉偏好的研究,也没有关注山区生产的肉类。为了填补这一空白,这项研究评估了意大利公民对山区牛肉相关属性的偏好,并将结果与欧盟对山区食品的监管进行了对比。此外,还分析了解释意大利人对牛肉生产属性偏好异质性的因素。使用消费者面板在线收集数据,并使用最佳-最差比例缩放方法和潜在类别分析。研究结果表明,意大利人希望山牛肉更健康,并按照更高的动物福利标准生产。这种偏好表明,意大利人的期望与欧盟山区食品监管的质量标准之间存在差距,这种情况可能会危及欧盟委员会山区标签计划的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing Italians' Preferences for Mountain Beef Production Using a Best–Worst Scaling Approach
The European Union (EU) regulation on mountain food products represents a great opportunity for beef producers in mountain areas, particularly as the quality-certified food has received more attention from European consumers in recent years. However, for a food-quality system—such as the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme—to be effective, the regulation standards must meet consumer expectations. In Italy, there are few studies on consumer preferences regarding beef and none focused on meat produced in mountain areas. To help fill this gap, this study assessed the preferences of Italian citizens for attributes associated with beef produced in mountain areas and contrasted the results with the EU regulation on mountain food products. Furthermore, factors that explain the heterogeneity of Italians' preferences regarding beef production attributes were analyzed. Data were collected online using a consumer panel, and a best–worst scaling method and latent class analysis were used. The results indicate that Italians expect mountain beef to be healthier and produced according to higher animal welfare standards. Such preferences reveal the existence of a gap between what Italians expect and the quality standards of the EU regulation on mountain food products, a situation that may jeopardize the objectives of the European Commission's mountain labeling scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mountain Research and Development
Mountain Research and Development 地学-环境科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
18.80%
发文量
36
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: MRD features three peer-reviewed sections: MountainDevelopment, which contains “Transformation Knowledge,” MountainResearch, which contains “Systems Knowledge,” and MountainAgenda, which contains “Target Knowledge.” In addition, the MountainPlatform section offers International Mountain Society members an opportunity to convey information about their mountain initiatives and priorities; and the MountainMedia section presents reviews of recent publications on mountains and mountain development. Key research and development fields: -Society and culture- Policy, politics, and institutions- Economy- Bio- and geophysical environment- Ecosystems and cycles- Environmental risks- Resource and land use- Energy, infrastructure, and services- Methods and theories- Regions
期刊最新文献
Pastoralism in Changthang, Ladakh: Adaptations, Challenges, and Pathways for Sustainability Understanding the Heterogeneity of Swiss Alpine Summer Farms for Tailored Agricultural Policies: A Typology Social Technology for the Protection of the Páramo in the Central Andes of Ecuador Drying of Springs in the Himalayan Region of Nepal: Perspectives of Local Government Leaders on Causes, Consequences, and Conservation Efforts Publisher Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1