单级PEEK在陶瓷SimplifyTM椎间盘FDA IDE试验中的一年NDI和VAS结果

F. Geisler, D. Maislin, B. Keenan, G. Maislin
{"title":"单级PEEK在陶瓷SimplifyTM椎间盘FDA IDE试验中的一年NDI和VAS结果","authors":"F. Geisler, D. Maislin, B. Keenan, G. Maislin","doi":"10.4172/2325-9701.1000320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was performed to evaluate the early clinical results at one year for the Simplify™ Cervical Artificial Disc. We compared outcomes for 150 Simplify Disc subjects at one-year followup in a prospective, multicenter, FDA IDE clinical trial with 119 propensity score matched historical control subjects who received conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. The outcome measures included the change from preoperative baseline to one-year in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain, with scores for the few missing oneyear follow-up implicitly imputed using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM). The MMRM was used to estimate within group and between group differences controlling for propensity score subclass and the relevant baseline value. The adjusted mean changes (and standard errors) in NDI from baseline to one year were -46.7 (SE=1.7, p<0.001) and -38.1 (SE=1.9, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc subjects and ACDF control subjects, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean NDI change at one year was -8.7 (SE=2.7) with p=0.002; the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference was -14.0 to -3.3. The adjusted mean changes in VAS neck and arm pain from baseline to one year were -62.4 (SE=2.0, p<0.001) and -55.2 (SE=2.3, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc and ACDF controls, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean VAS neck and arm pain change at one year was -7.3 (SE=3.3) with p=0.029 (95% CI -13.8 to 0.8). Therefore, it can be concluded that the one-year clinical results of the Simplify Disc are superior to ACDF for both 1) improvement of NDI and 2) improvement in VAS neck and arm pain. Inspection of all eight prior FDA cervical total disc replacement studies indicates that these good results for the Simplify Disc can be expected to continue for five years and beyond, but longer term follow-up is necessary for verification.","PeriodicalId":90240,"journal":{"name":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"One-Year NDI and VAS Outcomes from the Single-Level PEEK-on-Ceramic SimplifyTM Disc FDA IDE Trial\",\"authors\":\"F. Geisler, D. Maislin, B. Keenan, G. Maislin\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2325-9701.1000320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was performed to evaluate the early clinical results at one year for the Simplify™ Cervical Artificial Disc. We compared outcomes for 150 Simplify Disc subjects at one-year followup in a prospective, multicenter, FDA IDE clinical trial with 119 propensity score matched historical control subjects who received conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. The outcome measures included the change from preoperative baseline to one-year in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain, with scores for the few missing oneyear follow-up implicitly imputed using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM). The MMRM was used to estimate within group and between group differences controlling for propensity score subclass and the relevant baseline value. The adjusted mean changes (and standard errors) in NDI from baseline to one year were -46.7 (SE=1.7, p<0.001) and -38.1 (SE=1.9, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc subjects and ACDF control subjects, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean NDI change at one year was -8.7 (SE=2.7) with p=0.002; the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference was -14.0 to -3.3. The adjusted mean changes in VAS neck and arm pain from baseline to one year were -62.4 (SE=2.0, p<0.001) and -55.2 (SE=2.3, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc and ACDF controls, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean VAS neck and arm pain change at one year was -7.3 (SE=3.3) with p=0.029 (95% CI -13.8 to 0.8). Therefore, it can be concluded that the one-year clinical results of the Simplify Disc are superior to ACDF for both 1) improvement of NDI and 2) improvement in VAS neck and arm pain. Inspection of all eight prior FDA cervical total disc replacement studies indicates that these good results for the Simplify Disc can be expected to continue for five years and beyond, but longer term follow-up is necessary for verification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":90240,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of spine & neurosurgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of spine & neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2325-9701.1000320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本研究旨在评估Simplify在一年内的早期临床结果™ 颈椎人工椎间盘。在一项前瞻性、多中心、美国食品药品监督管理局IDE临床试验中,我们比较了150名Simplify Disc受试者在一年随访中的结果,其中119名倾向评分匹配的历史对照受试者接受了常规颈前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)治疗单级颈椎退行性椎间盘疾病。结果测量包括从术前基线到一年颈部残疾指数(NDI)和颈部和手臂疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)的变化,少数缺失的一年随访的分数使用重复测量混合模型(MMRM)隐式估算。MMRM用于估计组内和组间的差异,控制倾向评分亚类和相关基线值。简化椎间盘受试者和ACDF对照受试者从基线到一年的NDI调整平均变化(和标准误差)分别为-46.7(SE=1.7,p<0.001)和-38.1(SE=1.9,p<0.001)。一年时,经调整的Simplify椎间盘与对照组的平均NDI变化差异为-8.7(SE=2.7),p=0.002;平均差异的95%置信区间为-14.0至-3.3。Simplify Disc和ACDF对照组的颈部和手臂疼痛VAS从基线到一年的调整平均变化分别为-62.4(SE=2.0,p<0.001)和-55.2(SE=2.3,p<0.001)。一年平均VAS颈部和手臂疼痛变化的Simplify Disc与对照组的调整差异为-7.3(SE=3.3),p=0.029(95%CI-13.8-0.8)。因此,可以得出结论,Simplify Disc一年的临床结果在1)改善NDI和2)改善VAS颈部和臂部疼痛方面均优于ACDF。对美国食品药品监督管理局先前所有八项宫颈全椎间盘置换研究的检查表明,Simplify椎间盘的这些良好结果预计将持续五年及更长时间,但需要进行长期随访以进行验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
One-Year NDI and VAS Outcomes from the Single-Level PEEK-on-Ceramic SimplifyTM Disc FDA IDE Trial
This study was performed to evaluate the early clinical results at one year for the Simplify™ Cervical Artificial Disc. We compared outcomes for 150 Simplify Disc subjects at one-year followup in a prospective, multicenter, FDA IDE clinical trial with 119 propensity score matched historical control subjects who received conventional anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level cervical degenerative disc disease. The outcome measures included the change from preoperative baseline to one-year in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and visual analog scales (VAS) for neck and arm pain, with scores for the few missing oneyear follow-up implicitly imputed using mixed models for repeated measures (MMRM). The MMRM was used to estimate within group and between group differences controlling for propensity score subclass and the relevant baseline value. The adjusted mean changes (and standard errors) in NDI from baseline to one year were -46.7 (SE=1.7, p<0.001) and -38.1 (SE=1.9, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc subjects and ACDF control subjects, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean NDI change at one year was -8.7 (SE=2.7) with p=0.002; the 95% confidence interval for the mean difference was -14.0 to -3.3. The adjusted mean changes in VAS neck and arm pain from baseline to one year were -62.4 (SE=2.0, p<0.001) and -55.2 (SE=2.3, p<0.001) for Simplify Disc and ACDF controls, respectively. The adjusted Simplify Disc vs. control difference in mean VAS neck and arm pain change at one year was -7.3 (SE=3.3) with p=0.029 (95% CI -13.8 to 0.8). Therefore, it can be concluded that the one-year clinical results of the Simplify Disc are superior to ACDF for both 1) improvement of NDI and 2) improvement in VAS neck and arm pain. Inspection of all eight prior FDA cervical total disc replacement studies indicates that these good results for the Simplify Disc can be expected to continue for five years and beyond, but longer term follow-up is necessary for verification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Myelopathy’s Worsening Due to Adjacent Peroperative Discal Herniatio: Case Report. One-Year NDI and VAS Outcomes from the Single-Level PEEK-on-Ceramic SimplifyTM Disc FDA IDE Trial Spinal Epidermoid Tumor – A Rare and Silent Occurrence Early Clinical Outcomes Comparing Porous PEEK, Smooth PEEK, and Structural Allograft Interbody Devices for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Spontaneous C1 Anterior Arch Fracture Following C1 Laminectomy for Cervical Meningioma: A Case Report and Review of Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1