神经认知特征与心血管危险因素的关系

María de la Paz Scribano Parada
{"title":"神经认知特征与心血管危险因素的关系","authors":"María de la Paz Scribano Parada","doi":"10.19080/jocct.2019.12.555848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Factors (CVRF) and Neurocognitive Disorders (ND) is important, since the first are modifiable. It was studied the influence of cardiovascular risk factors in the neurocognitive profile. Patients and Methods: Transversal analytic prospective study. Patients attended by cognitive symptoms were included. CVRF were recorded. According to Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA) (cutoff of 26 points) two groups were made: Without cognitive disorder (NoCD) and cognitive disorder (CD). Cognitive Domains (CD) were evaluated. Risk groups were established (No CVRF, 1 CVRF, 2 CVRF, 3 or more CVRF). The relation between risk groups with invidual cd and with CD and noCD groups, was established. Chi Square for attributes. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis for differences between groups, significance level p<0.05. Results: 66 patients (female 57/86%). Age 63.7±16 years. Most prevalent CVRF: physical inactivity, hypertension, smoking. MoCA average of 20.91±5.78. The CD group (n=48) received lower score in MoCA and worst performers in every cd. Groups 2 and 3CVRF able worst performance, and visuospatial/executive function were the most affected. Conclusion: People over 65 years with increased cardiovascular risk, have poorer cognitive performance. The factors with the greatest implication would be female, age, years of schooling and summation of cardiovascular risk factors. The cd most affected are visuospatial and attention.","PeriodicalId":73635,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between Neurocognitive Profile and Cardiovascular Risk Factors\",\"authors\":\"María de la Paz Scribano Parada\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/jocct.2019.12.555848\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Factors (CVRF) and Neurocognitive Disorders (ND) is important, since the first are modifiable. It was studied the influence of cardiovascular risk factors in the neurocognitive profile. Patients and Methods: Transversal analytic prospective study. Patients attended by cognitive symptoms were included. CVRF were recorded. According to Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA) (cutoff of 26 points) two groups were made: Without cognitive disorder (NoCD) and cognitive disorder (CD). Cognitive Domains (CD) were evaluated. Risk groups were established (No CVRF, 1 CVRF, 2 CVRF, 3 or more CVRF). The relation between risk groups with invidual cd and with CD and noCD groups, was established. Chi Square for attributes. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis for differences between groups, significance level p<0.05. Results: 66 patients (female 57/86%). Age 63.7±16 years. Most prevalent CVRF: physical inactivity, hypertension, smoking. MoCA average of 20.91±5.78. The CD group (n=48) received lower score in MoCA and worst performers in every cd. Groups 2 and 3CVRF able worst performance, and visuospatial/executive function were the most affected. Conclusion: People over 65 years with increased cardiovascular risk, have poorer cognitive performance. The factors with the greatest implication would be female, age, years of schooling and summation of cardiovascular risk factors. The cd most affected are visuospatial and attention.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73635,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/jocct.2019.12.555848\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiology & cardiovascular therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/jocct.2019.12.555848","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:心血管危险因素(CVRF)与神经认知障碍(ND)之间的关系很重要,因为前者是可以改变的。研究了心血管危险因素对神经认知的影响。患者和方法:横向分析前瞻性研究。包括有认知症状的患者。记录CVRF。根据蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)(26分截止点)分为无认知障碍(NoCD)和认知障碍(CD)两组。评估认知域(CD)。建立风险组(无CVRF、1 CVRF、2 CVRF、3 CVRF及以上)。建立了个体cd危险组、cd和非cd危险组之间的关系。x平方分布表示属性。组间差异采用ANOVA和Kruskal-Wallis分析,显著性水平p<0.05。结果:66例(女性57/86%)。年龄63.7±16岁。最常见的CVRF:缺乏运动、高血压、吸烟。MoCA平均值为20.91±5.78。CD组(n=48) MoCA评分较低,每张CD表现最差。2组和3CVRF组表现最差,视觉空间/执行功能受影响最大。结论:65岁以上人群心血管风险增加,认知能力较差。影响最大的因素是女性、年龄、受教育年限和心血管危险因素的总和。受影响最大的是视觉空间和注意力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Relationship Between Neurocognitive Profile and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Introduction: Relationship between Cardiovascular Risk Factors (CVRF) and Neurocognitive Disorders (ND) is important, since the first are modifiable. It was studied the influence of cardiovascular risk factors in the neurocognitive profile. Patients and Methods: Transversal analytic prospective study. Patients attended by cognitive symptoms were included. CVRF were recorded. According to Montreal Cognitive Assesment (MoCA) (cutoff of 26 points) two groups were made: Without cognitive disorder (NoCD) and cognitive disorder (CD). Cognitive Domains (CD) were evaluated. Risk groups were established (No CVRF, 1 CVRF, 2 CVRF, 3 or more CVRF). The relation between risk groups with invidual cd and with CD and noCD groups, was established. Chi Square for attributes. ANOVA and Kruskal-Wallis for differences between groups, significance level p<0.05. Results: 66 patients (female 57/86%). Age 63.7±16 years. Most prevalent CVRF: physical inactivity, hypertension, smoking. MoCA average of 20.91±5.78. The CD group (n=48) received lower score in MoCA and worst performers in every cd. Groups 2 and 3CVRF able worst performance, and visuospatial/executive function were the most affected. Conclusion: People over 65 years with increased cardiovascular risk, have poorer cognitive performance. The factors with the greatest implication would be female, age, years of schooling and summation of cardiovascular risk factors. The cd most affected are visuospatial and attention.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Role of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Early Detection of Myocarditis in Patients Recovered from COVID-19 Ldl-c Levels In Secondary Prevention: The Lower The Better and The Sooner The Better Mechanical Pulmonary Valve Thrombosis: Recurrence and Response to Thrombolytic Therapy Ocular Ischemic Syndrome as a Clue for Carotid Artery Stenosis The results of Percutaneous Transcatheter Pulmonary valvuloplasty in Adult Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1