混合主义作为一种国家政策风格:多数主义与共识主义在巴西的路径与困境

E. Grin, Fernando Luiz Abrucio
{"title":"混合主义作为一种国家政策风格:多数主义与共识主义在巴西的路径与困境","authors":"E. Grin, Fernando Luiz Abrucio","doi":"10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.234516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study reviews the literature on politics and public policies in Brazil arguing that the dominant national policy style may be characterized as hybrid, since it combines majoritarian and consociational traits. This public policy style was mainly hegemonic between the two presidential impeachment processes (1992-2015). This arrangement has two main characteristics: presidential dominance over Congress, albeit also marked by broad negotiation with this branch and greater federative cooperation led by the Union, alongside with subnational entities, and the implementation of social participation arenas. There are dilemmas and problems in this institutional hybridity, but it has been difficult to evade this combination when trying to maintain minimum standards of political governance and public policies. It is concluded that incremental improvements are more effective than the complete modification of the model.","PeriodicalId":31327,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hybridism as a national policy style: paths and dilemmas of the majoritarian and consensus approaches in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"E. Grin, Fernando Luiz Abrucio\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.234516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract: This study reviews the literature on politics and public policies in Brazil arguing that the dominant national policy style may be characterized as hybrid, since it combines majoritarian and consociational traits. This public policy style was mainly hegemonic between the two presidential impeachment processes (1992-2015). This arrangement has two main characteristics: presidential dominance over Congress, albeit also marked by broad negotiation with this branch and greater federative cooperation led by the Union, alongside with subnational entities, and the implementation of social participation arenas. There are dilemmas and problems in this institutional hybridity, but it has been difficult to evade this combination when trying to maintain minimum standards of political governance and public policies. It is concluded that incremental improvements are more effective than the complete modification of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31327,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.234516\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Ciencia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-3352.2021.35.234516","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本研究回顾了有关巴西政治和公共政策的文献,认为占主导地位的国家政策风格可能具有混合性,因为它结合了多数主义和联合主义的特征。这种公共政策风格在两次总统弹劾程序(1992-2015)之间主要是霸权。这种安排有两个主要特点:总统对国会的主导地位,尽管也以与该部门的广泛谈判和由联盟领导的与国家以下实体的更大的联邦合作为标志,以及实施社会参与领域。这种制度混杂存在着困境和问题,但在试图保持政治治理和公共政策的最低标准时,很难回避这种结合。得出的结论是,增量改进比完全修改模型更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hybridism as a national policy style: paths and dilemmas of the majoritarian and consensus approaches in Brazil
Abstract: This study reviews the literature on politics and public policies in Brazil arguing that the dominant national policy style may be characterized as hybrid, since it combines majoritarian and consociational traits. This public policy style was mainly hegemonic between the two presidential impeachment processes (1992-2015). This arrangement has two main characteristics: presidential dominance over Congress, albeit also marked by broad negotiation with this branch and greater federative cooperation led by the Union, alongside with subnational entities, and the implementation of social participation arenas. There are dilemmas and problems in this institutional hybridity, but it has been difficult to evade this combination when trying to maintain minimum standards of political governance and public policies. It is concluded that incremental improvements are more effective than the complete modification of the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Entre a punição ressocializadora e o idealismo punitivo: a segurança pública nos discursos da Igreja Universal do Reino de Deus e nos de Jair Bolsonaro nas eleições de 2018 Bíblia, farda, empreendedorismo e luta contra o “sistema”: a cosmovisão das candidaturas bolsonaristas à prefeitura de Macapá em 2020 Uso, mediação e construção de evidências pela burocracia federal: quem está e o que acontece na interface entre a gestão e a academia? Privacidade no século 21: proteção de dados, democracia e modelos regulatórios Muita tinta, pouco resultado. A Ciência Política consegue responder quem ganha o quê, quando e como?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1