专家组对决策的附加值是什么?

IF 2.8 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Journal of Decision Systems Pub Date : 2022-12-15 DOI:10.1080/12460125.2022.2156556
J. Pomerol
{"title":"专家组对决策的附加值是什么?","authors":"J. Pomerol","doi":"10.1080/12460125.2022.2156556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we raise the question of the usefulness of expert groups or scientific councils like those that were created during the COVID-19 crisis in several countries. We begin by characterising expertise and the limits of experts' knowledge. Then, we recall why expertise is not decision-making. In the third part we review the weaknesses of group thinking and the role of responsibility and commitment in decision-making. The fourth part is devoted to learning and we finally conclude on the usefulness of using expert knowledge and/or expert group knowledge, depending on the situation and on your aim but certainly not inducting experts as decision makers.","PeriodicalId":45565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Decision Systems","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the added value of expert groups for decision making?\",\"authors\":\"J. Pomerol\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/12460125.2022.2156556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, we raise the question of the usefulness of expert groups or scientific councils like those that were created during the COVID-19 crisis in several countries. We begin by characterising expertise and the limits of experts' knowledge. Then, we recall why expertise is not decision-making. In the third part we review the weaknesses of group thinking and the role of responsibility and commitment in decision-making. The fourth part is devoted to learning and we finally conclude on the usefulness of using expert knowledge and/or expert group knowledge, depending on the situation and on your aim but certainly not inducting experts as decision makers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Decision Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2156556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Decision Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/12460125.2022.2156556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在这篇论文中,我们提出了专家组或科学委员会的有用性问题,比如在几个国家新冠肺炎危机期间成立的专家组或委员会。我们首先描述专业知识和专家知识的局限性。然后,我们回顾一下为什么专业知识不是决策。在第三部分中,我们回顾了群体思维的弱点以及责任和承诺在决策中的作用。第四部分致力于学习,我们最后总结了使用专家知识和/或专家组知识的有用性,这取决于情况和您的目标,但肯定不会让专家成为决策者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
What is the added value of expert groups for decision making?
In this paper, we raise the question of the usefulness of expert groups or scientific councils like those that were created during the COVID-19 crisis in several countries. We begin by characterising expertise and the limits of experts' knowledge. Then, we recall why expertise is not decision-making. In the third part we review the weaknesses of group thinking and the role of responsibility and commitment in decision-making. The fourth part is devoted to learning and we finally conclude on the usefulness of using expert knowledge and/or expert group knowledge, depending on the situation and on your aim but certainly not inducting experts as decision makers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Decision Systems
Journal of Decision Systems OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Public acceptance of smart home technologies in the UK: a citizens’ jury study Perceptions of facilitators towards adoption of AI-based solutions for sustainable agriculture I am therefore, I do: a fit perspective of decision-making styles and business intelligence usage AI: A knowledge sharing tool for improving employees’ performance Data-driven decision making in advanced manufacturing Systems: modeling and analysis of critical success factors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1