Andrew M. Liebhold, C. Björkman, A. Roques, O. Bjørnstad, M. Klapwijk
{"title":"森林昆虫爆发驱动同域生叶动物的相位同步:探索潜在的机制","authors":"Andrew M. Liebhold, C. Björkman, A. Roques, O. Bjørnstad, M. Klapwijk","doi":"10.1002/1438-390x.12060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We explore a common feature of insect population dynamics, interspecific synchrony, which refers to synchrony in population dynamics among sympatric populations of different species. Such synchrony can arise via several possible mechanisms, including shared environmental effects and shared trophic interactions, but distinguishing the relative importance among different mechanisms can be challenging. We analyze interannual time series of population densities of the larch budmoth, Zeiraphera griseana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), along with six sympatric larch-feeding folivores from a site in the European Alps 1952 – 1979. These species include five lepidopterans, Exapate duratella , Ptycholomoides aeriferana , Spilonota laricana , Epirrita autumnata and Teleiodes saltuum , and one hymenopteran sawfly Pristiphora laricis . We docu-ment that the highly regular oscillatory behavior (period 9 – 10 years) of Z . griseana populations is similarly evident in the dynamics of most of the sympatric folivores. We also find that all of the sympatric species are phase synchronized with Z . griseana populations with half of the sympatric species exhibiting nonlagged phase synchrony and three of the species exhibiting 2 – 5 year lags behind Z . griseana populations. We adapt a previously developed tritrophic model of Z . griseana dynamics to explore possible mechanisms responsible for observed phase synchronization. Results suggest that either shared stochastic influences (e.g., weather) or shared parasitoid impacts are likely causes of nonlagged phase synchronization. The model further indicates that observed patterns of lagged phase synchronization are most likely caused by either shared delayed induced host plant defenses or direct density-dependent effects shared with Z . griseana .","PeriodicalId":54597,"journal":{"name":"Population Ecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1438-390x.12060","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outbreaking forest insect drives phase synchrony among sympatric folivores: Exploring potential mechanisms\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Liebhold, C. Björkman, A. Roques, O. Bjørnstad, M. Klapwijk\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/1438-390x.12060\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We explore a common feature of insect population dynamics, interspecific synchrony, which refers to synchrony in population dynamics among sympatric populations of different species. Such synchrony can arise via several possible mechanisms, including shared environmental effects and shared trophic interactions, but distinguishing the relative importance among different mechanisms can be challenging. We analyze interannual time series of population densities of the larch budmoth, Zeiraphera griseana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), along with six sympatric larch-feeding folivores from a site in the European Alps 1952 – 1979. These species include five lepidopterans, Exapate duratella , Ptycholomoides aeriferana , Spilonota laricana , Epirrita autumnata and Teleiodes saltuum , and one hymenopteran sawfly Pristiphora laricis . We docu-ment that the highly regular oscillatory behavior (period 9 – 10 years) of Z . griseana populations is similarly evident in the dynamics of most of the sympatric folivores. We also find that all of the sympatric species are phase synchronized with Z . griseana populations with half of the sympatric species exhibiting nonlagged phase synchrony and three of the species exhibiting 2 – 5 year lags behind Z . griseana populations. We adapt a previously developed tritrophic model of Z . griseana dynamics to explore possible mechanisms responsible for observed phase synchronization. Results suggest that either shared stochastic influences (e.g., weather) or shared parasitoid impacts are likely causes of nonlagged phase synchronization. The model further indicates that observed patterns of lagged phase synchronization are most likely caused by either shared delayed induced host plant defenses or direct density-dependent effects shared with Z . griseana .\",\"PeriodicalId\":54597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Population Ecology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1438-390x.12060\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Population Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390x.12060\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Population Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1438-390x.12060","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
We explore a common feature of insect population dynamics, interspecific synchrony, which refers to synchrony in population dynamics among sympatric populations of different species. Such synchrony can arise via several possible mechanisms, including shared environmental effects and shared trophic interactions, but distinguishing the relative importance among different mechanisms can be challenging. We analyze interannual time series of population densities of the larch budmoth, Zeiraphera griseana (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), along with six sympatric larch-feeding folivores from a site in the European Alps 1952 – 1979. These species include five lepidopterans, Exapate duratella , Ptycholomoides aeriferana , Spilonota laricana , Epirrita autumnata and Teleiodes saltuum , and one hymenopteran sawfly Pristiphora laricis . We docu-ment that the highly regular oscillatory behavior (period 9 – 10 years) of Z . griseana populations is similarly evident in the dynamics of most of the sympatric folivores. We also find that all of the sympatric species are phase synchronized with Z . griseana populations with half of the sympatric species exhibiting nonlagged phase synchrony and three of the species exhibiting 2 – 5 year lags behind Z . griseana populations. We adapt a previously developed tritrophic model of Z . griseana dynamics to explore possible mechanisms responsible for observed phase synchronization. Results suggest that either shared stochastic influences (e.g., weather) or shared parasitoid impacts are likely causes of nonlagged phase synchronization. The model further indicates that observed patterns of lagged phase synchronization are most likely caused by either shared delayed induced host plant defenses or direct density-dependent effects shared with Z . griseana .
期刊介绍:
Population Ecology, formerly known as Researches on Population Ecology launched in Dec 1952, is the official journal of the Society of Population Ecology. Population Ecology publishes original research articles and reviews (including invited reviews) on various aspects of population ecology, from the individual to the community level. Among the specific fields included are population dynamics and distribution, evolutionary ecology, ecological genetics, theoretical models, conservation biology, agroecosystem studies, and bioresource management. Manuscripts should contain new results of empirical and/or theoretical investigations concerning facts, patterns, processes, mechanisms or concepts of population ecology; those purely descriptive in nature are not suitable for this journal. All manuscripts are reviewed anonymously by two or more referees, and the final editorial decision is made by the Chief Editor or an Associate Editor based on the referees'' evaluations.