Scriptus Propertius:正文之间的Propertius

IF 0.5 3区 历史学 0 CLASSICS HELIOS Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1353/hel.2022.0002
Erik Fredericksen
{"title":"Scriptus Propertius:正文之间的Propertius","authors":"Erik Fredericksen","doi":"10.1353/hel.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article traces how Propertius imagines being read, and argues that problems surrounding the representation of his male body underlie conflicting anxieties of authorship. It begins by suggesting that a number of funereal scenes allow Propertius to figure his own absence in future readers' interactions with his poetry and express his lack of control over the reception of his text. At the same time, though, this epitaphic model of reading protects his body from his readers' aggressive gaze. In fact, Propertius continually deflects visual focus from his body throughout his poetry, and is wary of inscribing his body into his text and becoming a textual-bodily object like Cynthia. Finally, the article examines occasions when Propertius is marked with a nota. These scenes allow Propertius to envision the threat of textual objectification he elsewhere avoids, and express anxieties about what it means to be read. Drawing on the ways in which Propertius's elegies display and conceal his body, the article claims that this poetry, so concerned with literary immortality and poetic fame, also evidences a deep—and gendered—ambivalence toward becoming an object to be read.","PeriodicalId":43032,"journal":{"name":"HELIOS","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scriptus Propertius: Propertius between Body and Text\",\"authors\":\"Erik Fredericksen\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/hel.2022.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article traces how Propertius imagines being read, and argues that problems surrounding the representation of his male body underlie conflicting anxieties of authorship. It begins by suggesting that a number of funereal scenes allow Propertius to figure his own absence in future readers' interactions with his poetry and express his lack of control over the reception of his text. At the same time, though, this epitaphic model of reading protects his body from his readers' aggressive gaze. In fact, Propertius continually deflects visual focus from his body throughout his poetry, and is wary of inscribing his body into his text and becoming a textual-bodily object like Cynthia. Finally, the article examines occasions when Propertius is marked with a nota. These scenes allow Propertius to envision the threat of textual objectification he elsewhere avoids, and express anxieties about what it means to be read. Drawing on the ways in which Propertius's elegies display and conceal his body, the article claims that this poetry, so concerned with literary immortality and poetic fame, also evidences a deep—and gendered—ambivalence toward becoming an object to be read.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HELIOS\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HELIOS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2022.0002\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HELIOS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/hel.2022.0002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:这篇文章追溯了Propertius是如何想象被阅读的,并认为围绕他男性身体的表现问题是作者身份冲突焦虑的基础。它首先表明,一些葬礼场景让普罗佩蒂乌斯能够想象自己在未来读者与他的诗歌互动中的缺席,并表达他对文本接收缺乏控制。然而,与此同时,这种墓志铭式的阅读模式保护了他的身体免受读者咄咄逼人的凝视。事实上,Propertius在他的诗歌中不断地将视觉焦点从他的身体上转移开,并警惕将他的身体刻进他的文本中,成为像Cynthia那样的文本身体对象。最后,文章考察了Propertius被标记为nota的情况。这些场景让Propertius能够想象他在其他地方避免的文本对象化的威胁,并表达对阅读意味着什么的焦虑。根据普罗佩蒂乌斯的挽歌展示和隐藏身体的方式,文章声称,这首诗如此关注文学不朽和诗歌名声,也证明了一种深刻的、性别化的矛盾心理,即成为一个阅读对象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scriptus Propertius: Propertius between Body and Text
Abstract:This article traces how Propertius imagines being read, and argues that problems surrounding the representation of his male body underlie conflicting anxieties of authorship. It begins by suggesting that a number of funereal scenes allow Propertius to figure his own absence in future readers' interactions with his poetry and express his lack of control over the reception of his text. At the same time, though, this epitaphic model of reading protects his body from his readers' aggressive gaze. In fact, Propertius continually deflects visual focus from his body throughout his poetry, and is wary of inscribing his body into his text and becoming a textual-bodily object like Cynthia. Finally, the article examines occasions when Propertius is marked with a nota. These scenes allow Propertius to envision the threat of textual objectification he elsewhere avoids, and express anxieties about what it means to be read. Drawing on the ways in which Propertius's elegies display and conceal his body, the article claims that this poetry, so concerned with literary immortality and poetic fame, also evidences a deep—and gendered—ambivalence toward becoming an object to be read.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
HELIOS
HELIOS CLASSICS-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Notes on Contributors Being Achilles’ Heir: A Psychoanalytical Reading of Neoptolemus in Sophocles’ Philoctetes Echoes of Ovid? Memories of the Metamorphoses in Philostratus’s Imagines The Chalybes as an Historical People Notes on Contributors
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1