土著人对澳大利亚公共考古未来的看法

Q3 Arts and Humanities AP Arqueologia Publica Pub Date : 2021-03-21 DOI:10.23914/AP.V10I0.293
K. Pollard, Claire Smith, Jasmine Willika, V. Copley, V. Copley, Christopher Willson, Emily Poelina-Hunter, Julie Ah Quee
{"title":"土著人对澳大利亚公共考古未来的看法","authors":"K. Pollard, Claire Smith, Jasmine Willika, V. Copley, V. Copley, Christopher Willson, Emily Poelina-Hunter, Julie Ah Quee","doi":"10.23914/AP.V10I0.293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper was written in response to a request by the editors of the AP: Online Journal of Public Archaeology, Jaime Almansa Sánchez and Elena Papagiannopoulou, for Claire Smith to write on the future of public archaeology in Australia In Australia, public archaeology focusses on high profile colonial sites such as The Rocks in Sydney (Karskens 1999) and Port Arthur in Tasmania (Steele et al 2007;Frew 2012), tourism (e g Cole and Wallis 2019) or enhancing school curricula (Nichols et al 2005;Owens and Steele 2005) However, given her decades-long relationships with Jawoyn and Ngadjuri people (Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020), Claire Smith decided that a useful way of approaching this topic would be to obtain Indigenous views on the subject Accordingly, she contacted the Aboriginal co-authors of this article and invited them to co-author the paper The possibility to write in free form was a boon The ‘conversation’ format we settled on was designed to facilitate the voices of individuals, to present a range of Indigenous views, to allow people to express their views frankly, and to deal with the constraints of people being located in different parts of Australia as well as occasional lock-downs due to COVID-19 We decided on five topics/questions that would be the basis of the conversation Each Aboriginal author gave their views either by email or by phone These views were interwoven into a ‘conversation’ The language has been edited lightly for clarity and to simulate a real-life conversation The final text was approved by all authors © 2020, LAP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology All Rights Reserved","PeriodicalId":37365,"journal":{"name":"AP Arqueologia Publica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Indigenous views on the future of public archaeology in Australia\",\"authors\":\"K. Pollard, Claire Smith, Jasmine Willika, V. Copley, V. Copley, Christopher Willson, Emily Poelina-Hunter, Julie Ah Quee\",\"doi\":\"10.23914/AP.V10I0.293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper was written in response to a request by the editors of the AP: Online Journal of Public Archaeology, Jaime Almansa Sánchez and Elena Papagiannopoulou, for Claire Smith to write on the future of public archaeology in Australia In Australia, public archaeology focusses on high profile colonial sites such as The Rocks in Sydney (Karskens 1999) and Port Arthur in Tasmania (Steele et al 2007;Frew 2012), tourism (e g Cole and Wallis 2019) or enhancing school curricula (Nichols et al 2005;Owens and Steele 2005) However, given her decades-long relationships with Jawoyn and Ngadjuri people (Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020), Claire Smith decided that a useful way of approaching this topic would be to obtain Indigenous views on the subject Accordingly, she contacted the Aboriginal co-authors of this article and invited them to co-author the paper The possibility to write in free form was a boon The ‘conversation’ format we settled on was designed to facilitate the voices of individuals, to present a range of Indigenous views, to allow people to express their views frankly, and to deal with the constraints of people being located in different parts of Australia as well as occasional lock-downs due to COVID-19 We decided on five topics/questions that would be the basis of the conversation Each Aboriginal author gave their views either by email or by phone These views were interwoven into a ‘conversation’ The language has been edited lightly for clarity and to simulate a real-life conversation The final text was approved by all authors © 2020, LAP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology All Rights Reserved\",\"PeriodicalId\":37365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AP Arqueologia Publica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AP Arqueologia Publica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23914/AP.V10I0.293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AP Arqueologia Publica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23914/AP.V10I0.293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文是应美联社编辑的要求而写的:公共考古学在线杂志,Jaime Almansa Sánchez和Elena Papagiannopoulou,为Claire Smith撰写关于澳大利亚公共考古学的未来在澳大利亚,公共考古学专注于高调的殖民遗址,如悉尼的岩石(Karskens 1999)和塔斯马尼亚的亚瑟港(Steele等人2007;Frew 2012),旅游业(例如Cole和Wallis 2019)或加强学校课程(Nichols等人2005;Owens和Steele 2005)。考虑到她与Jawoyn和Ngadjuri人长达数十年的关系(Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020),克莱尔·史密斯(Claire Smith)认为,处理这一主题的有效方法是获取土著对这一主题的看法。因此,她联系了本文的土著合著者,并邀请他们共同撰写论文。以自由形式写作的可能性是一种福音,我们确定的“对话”形式旨在促进个人的声音。提出一系列土著人的观点,让人们坦率地表达自己的观点,和处理约束的人位于澳大利亚的不同部分以及偶尔锁定由于COVID-19五个主题/问题,我们决定将谈话的基础上每个土著给作者自己的观点通过电子邮件或电话这些观点交织成一个“谈话”的语言编辑轻了清晰和模拟一个真实的对话最终文本经所有作者©2020,腿上:公共考古在线期刊版权所有
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Indigenous views on the future of public archaeology in Australia
This paper was written in response to a request by the editors of the AP: Online Journal of Public Archaeology, Jaime Almansa Sánchez and Elena Papagiannopoulou, for Claire Smith to write on the future of public archaeology in Australia In Australia, public archaeology focusses on high profile colonial sites such as The Rocks in Sydney (Karskens 1999) and Port Arthur in Tasmania (Steele et al 2007;Frew 2012), tourism (e g Cole and Wallis 2019) or enhancing school curricula (Nichols et al 2005;Owens and Steele 2005) However, given her decades-long relationships with Jawoyn and Ngadjuri people (Smith 1999;Smith et al 2016;Smith et al 2020), Claire Smith decided that a useful way of approaching this topic would be to obtain Indigenous views on the subject Accordingly, she contacted the Aboriginal co-authors of this article and invited them to co-author the paper The possibility to write in free form was a boon The ‘conversation’ format we settled on was designed to facilitate the voices of individuals, to present a range of Indigenous views, to allow people to express their views frankly, and to deal with the constraints of people being located in different parts of Australia as well as occasional lock-downs due to COVID-19 We decided on five topics/questions that would be the basis of the conversation Each Aboriginal author gave their views either by email or by phone These views were interwoven into a ‘conversation’ The language has been edited lightly for clarity and to simulate a real-life conversation The final text was approved by all authors © 2020, LAP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology All Rights Reserved
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
AP Arqueologia Publica
AP Arqueologia Publica Arts and Humanities-Archeology (arts and humanities)
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: AP: Online Journal in Public Archaeology is an international, peer reviewed, open access journal devoted exclusively to Public Archaeology. Edited by JAS Arqueología, it is freely distributed online in order to enable easy access to research and debates, and to spread the growing realm that is starting to settle into everyday archaeological practice. The aim of this journal is to explore the multiple relations between Archaeology and Society. Archaeology is generally understood as the study of past societies from their remains, and Public Archaeology is the study of the relations between Archaeology and Society in every aspect of daily life (social, economic and political). We are talking about the present of Archaeology and the different issues that surround and affect it. Below is a list of key topics covered: -The economic and political impact of Archaeology. -Archaeology as Popular Culture. -The history and development of Archaeology as a professional activity. -Theoretical issues around the publicity of Archaeology. -The image of Archaeology. -Legal issues affecting archaeological practice and the illicit trade of antiquities. -The presentation of Archaeology to the public. Of course, this is not an exhaustive list of topics, which is why the criteria for the preliminary selection of papers are subject to the topic. This journal has been created with the desire to become a reference in the field of Public Archaeology. Therefore, we encourage all of you working within the realm of Public Archaeology to share your thoughts, experiences and ideas in this open medium for the development of Public Archaeology.
期刊最新文献
The Gods die in museums Building heritage communities online: The experience of the Summer School Program ‘Engaging Communities in Cultural Heritage’ Modeling Municipal Heritage Management Assessing endangerment of archaeological heritage in Latvia: legal framework and socio-economic aspects Review: Educación y divulgación del patrimonio arqueológico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1