甲烷排放的边际损害:臭氧对农业的影响

IF 3.2 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Environmental & Resource Economics Pub Date : 2023-02-21 DOI:10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6
Jon Sampedro, Stephanie Waldhoff, Marcus Sarofim, Rita Van Dingenen
{"title":"甲烷排放的边际损害:臭氧对农业的影响","authors":"Jon Sampedro, Stephanie Waldhoff, Marcus Sarofim, Rita Van Dingenen","doi":"10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Methane directly contributes to air pollution, as an ozone precursor, and to climate change, generating physical and economic damages to different systems, namely agriculture, vegetation, energy, human health, or biodiversity. The methane-related damages to climate, measured as the Social Cost of Methane, and to human health have been analyzed by different studies and considered by government rulemaking in the last decades, but the ozone-related damages to crop revenues associated to methane emissions have not been incorporated to policy agenda. Using a combination of the Global Change Analysis Model and the TM5-FASST Scenario Screening Tool, we estimate that global marginal agricultural damages range from ~423 to 556 $2010/t-CH<sub>4</sub>, of which 98 $2010/t-CH<sub>4</sub> occur in the USA, which is the most affected region due to its role as a major crop producer, followed by China, EU-15, and India. These damages would represent 39-59% of the climate damages and 28-64% of the human health damages associated with methane emissions by previous studies. The marginal damages to crop revenues calculated in this study complement the damages from methane to climate and human health, and provides valuable information to be considered in future cost-benefits analyses.</p>","PeriodicalId":48299,"journal":{"name":"Environmental & Resource Economics","volume":"84 1","pages":"1095-1126"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457165/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Marginal Damage of Methane Emissions: Ozone Impacts on Agriculture.\",\"authors\":\"Jon Sampedro, Stephanie Waldhoff, Marcus Sarofim, Rita Van Dingenen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Methane directly contributes to air pollution, as an ozone precursor, and to climate change, generating physical and economic damages to different systems, namely agriculture, vegetation, energy, human health, or biodiversity. The methane-related damages to climate, measured as the Social Cost of Methane, and to human health have been analyzed by different studies and considered by government rulemaking in the last decades, but the ozone-related damages to crop revenues associated to methane emissions have not been incorporated to policy agenda. Using a combination of the Global Change Analysis Model and the TM5-FASST Scenario Screening Tool, we estimate that global marginal agricultural damages range from ~423 to 556 $2010/t-CH<sub>4</sub>, of which 98 $2010/t-CH<sub>4</sub> occur in the USA, which is the most affected region due to its role as a major crop producer, followed by China, EU-15, and India. These damages would represent 39-59% of the climate damages and 28-64% of the human health damages associated with methane emissions by previous studies. The marginal damages to crop revenues calculated in this study complement the damages from methane to climate and human health, and provides valuable information to be considered in future cost-benefits analyses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental & Resource Economics\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"1095-1126\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11457165/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental & Resource Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental & Resource Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00750-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

甲烷作为一种臭氧前体直接造成空气污染和气候变化,对不同的系统,即农业、植被、能源、人类健康或生物多样性造成物理和经济损失。在过去几十年中,不同的研究分析了甲烷对气候和人类健康造成的损害(以甲烷的社会成本衡量),政府制定规则时也考虑了这些损害,但与甲烷排放相关的臭氧对作物收入造成的损害尚未纳入政策议程。结合使用全球变化分析模型和 TM5-FASST 情景筛选工具,我们估计全球农业边际损失为 ~423 至 556 2010 美元/t-CH4,其中 98 2010 美元/t-CH4 发生在美国,由于美国是主要的农作物生产国,因此受影响最大,其次是中国、欧盟 15 国和印度。这些损失占以往研究中与甲烷排放相关的气候损失的 39-59%,人类健康损失的 28-64%。本研究计算的农作物收入边际损失补充了甲烷对气候和人类健康造成的损失,为未来的成本效益分析提供了宝贵的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Marginal Damage of Methane Emissions: Ozone Impacts on Agriculture.

Methane directly contributes to air pollution, as an ozone precursor, and to climate change, generating physical and economic damages to different systems, namely agriculture, vegetation, energy, human health, or biodiversity. The methane-related damages to climate, measured as the Social Cost of Methane, and to human health have been analyzed by different studies and considered by government rulemaking in the last decades, but the ozone-related damages to crop revenues associated to methane emissions have not been incorporated to policy agenda. Using a combination of the Global Change Analysis Model and the TM5-FASST Scenario Screening Tool, we estimate that global marginal agricultural damages range from ~423 to 556 $2010/t-CH4, of which 98 $2010/t-CH4 occur in the USA, which is the most affected region due to its role as a major crop producer, followed by China, EU-15, and India. These damages would represent 39-59% of the climate damages and 28-64% of the human health damages associated with methane emissions by previous studies. The marginal damages to crop revenues calculated in this study complement the damages from methane to climate and human health, and provides valuable information to be considered in future cost-benefits analyses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
3.40%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The primary concern of Environmental & Resource Economics (ERE) is the application of economic theory and methods to environmental issues and problems that require detailed analysis in order to improve management strategies. The contemporary environmental debate is in a constant state of flux and new or relatively unexplored topics are continually emerging. The Journal provides a forum for the further exploration of the causes, consequences and policy responses linked to these topics, across a range of spatial and temporal scales up to the global dimension. Contributions to the Journal should directly or indirectly be relevant to the policy formulation and application process. Areas of particular interest include: evaluation and development of instruments of environmental policy; cost-benefit and cost effectiveness analysis; sectoral environmental policy impact analysis; modelling and simulation; institutional arrangements; resource pricing and the valuation of environmental goods; environmental quality indicators. The editors wish to encourage a pluralistic approach to both theoretical and applied contributions. The publication of empirically based, policy-oriented research is given a high priority in the Journal in order to further critical discussion. Environmental & Resource Economics will also accept papers with an interdisciplinary approach, where this helps to improve knowledge of the real world complexities present, provided that the analysis retains links to or components of economic thinking. The Journal is required reading for economists, economic geographers and other academics, professionals and officials with a working interest in environmental matters.
期刊最新文献
Nudging the Food Basket Green: The Effects of Commitment and Badges on the Carbon Footprint of Food Shopping Willingness-to-Pay for Energy Efficiency: Evidence from the European Common Market Mosquitoes and Potatoes: How Local Climatic Conditions Impede Development Protecting Life and Lung: Protected Areas Affect Fine Particulate Matter and Respiratory Hospitalizations in the Brazilian Amazon Biome Nutrition and Climate Policies in the European Union: Friends or Enemies?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1