《2021年加拿大国际私法案例》

Ashley Barnes
{"title":"《2021年加拿大国际私法案例》","authors":"Ashley Barnes","doi":"10.1017/cyl.2022.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The plaintiff brought an Internet defamation action in British Columbia against Twitter related to a series of tweets targeting his relationship with former US President Bill Clinton and linking him to a false #pizzagate conspiracy involving child trafficking. The plaintiff is a Vancouver-based businessman and philanthropist with significant ties to the United States. Twitter challenged British Columbia’s jurisdiction claiming that the action should proceed in California where there would be no liability under current US law relating to free speech.1 At first instance, the BC Supreme","PeriodicalId":52441,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","volume":"59 1","pages":"584 - 622"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2021\",\"authors\":\"Ashley Barnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/cyl.2022.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The plaintiff brought an Internet defamation action in British Columbia against Twitter related to a series of tweets targeting his relationship with former US President Bill Clinton and linking him to a false #pizzagate conspiracy involving child trafficking. The plaintiff is a Vancouver-based businessman and philanthropist with significant ties to the United States. Twitter challenged British Columbia’s jurisdiction claiming that the action should proceed in California where there would be no liability under current US law relating to free speech.1 At first instance, the BC Supreme\",\"PeriodicalId\":52441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"584 - 622\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian yearbook of international law. Annuaire canadien de droit international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cyl.2022.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

原告在不列颠哥伦比亚省对推特提起网络诽谤诉讼,该诉讼涉及一系列针对他与美国前总统比尔·克林顿关系的推文,并将他与涉及贩卖儿童的虚假#pizzagate阴谋联系起来。原告是一名温哥华商人和慈善家,与美国有着重要关系。推特对不列颠哥伦比亚省的管辖权提出质疑,声称诉讼应在加利福尼亚州进行,根据美国现行有关言论自由的法律,加利福尼亚州不承担任何责任。1首先,不列颠哥伦比亚省最高法院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Canadian Cases in Private International Law in 2021
The plaintiff brought an Internet defamation action in British Columbia against Twitter related to a series of tweets targeting his relationship with former US President Bill Clinton and linking him to a false #pizzagate conspiracy involving child trafficking. The plaintiff is a Vancouver-based businessman and philanthropist with significant ties to the United States. Twitter challenged British Columbia’s jurisdiction claiming that the action should proceed in California where there would be no liability under current US law relating to free speech.1 At first instance, the BC Supreme
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Investissement Le Scotland Act Reference, les référendums sur l’indépendance et le droit à l’autodétermination des peuples The Negotiation, Diffusion, and Legacy of NAFTA Chapter 11: An Empirical Eulogy Recovering the Dimensions of Dignity in Religious Freedom: Protecting Religious Proselytization in International Human Rights State International Agreements: The United States, Canada, and Constitutional Evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1