麦芽品种及产地对麦汁风味的影响

IF 1.3 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists Pub Date : 2022-03-30 DOI:10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156
Susan Stewart, Ross Sanders, Natalja Ivanova, K. Wilkinson, D. Stewart, Jian-Jun Dong, Shumin Hu, D. E. Evans, J. Able
{"title":"麦芽品种及产地对麦汁风味的影响","authors":"Susan Stewart, Ross Sanders, Natalja Ivanova, K. Wilkinson, D. Stewart, Jian-Jun Dong, Shumin Hu, D. E. Evans, J. Able","doi":"10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Beer flavor is primarily impacted by malt kilning and the choice of yeast/hops in the beer recipe. Although barley malt is the material backbone of most beers, variety has until recently been largely overlooked with respect to flavor differences. In this study, 11 malt variety samples from multiple Australian and international (UK, Canada, China) growing regions were infusion mashed (65 °C) at laboratory scale to produce unboiled wort to investigate differences between the flavor profiles observed with sensory assessment and headspace-SPME gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME GC-MS). Sensory evaluation identified wort flavor differences with the control heritage samples, Maris Otter/Schooner, having the highest overall flavor complexity and acceptability. The Chinese malted Chinese/Canadian samples had the lowest overall flavor complexity rankings. Overall, flavor complexity was correlated with KI, malt protein (negative), and β-glucosidase (negative), while sweetness intensity was correlated with limit dextrinase and pH. HS-SPME GC-MS analysis focused only on compounds that were significantly different between varieties (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05). Overall, 107 compounds were identified with significantly different levels between the varietal worts. The resultant PCA plots (overall, aldehydes, alcohols, esters, organic acids, terpenes, ketones) supported the sensory assessment, with Maris Otter and the Australian samples clustering in different PCA sectors compared to the Chinese malted Canadian/Chinese samples. These findings provide a basis for key compound identifications that influence malt flavor through the brewing process. The results have the potential to assist barley breeders in selecting optimized germplasm for future variety development and can assist maltsters and brewers to consistently target desired flavors for finished beers and potentially whisk(e)y. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156 .","PeriodicalId":17225,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Influence of Malt Variety and Origin on Wort Flavor\",\"authors\":\"Susan Stewart, Ross Sanders, Natalja Ivanova, K. Wilkinson, D. Stewart, Jian-Jun Dong, Shumin Hu, D. E. Evans, J. Able\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Beer flavor is primarily impacted by malt kilning and the choice of yeast/hops in the beer recipe. Although barley malt is the material backbone of most beers, variety has until recently been largely overlooked with respect to flavor differences. In this study, 11 malt variety samples from multiple Australian and international (UK, Canada, China) growing regions were infusion mashed (65 °C) at laboratory scale to produce unboiled wort to investigate differences between the flavor profiles observed with sensory assessment and headspace-SPME gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME GC-MS). Sensory evaluation identified wort flavor differences with the control heritage samples, Maris Otter/Schooner, having the highest overall flavor complexity and acceptability. The Chinese malted Chinese/Canadian samples had the lowest overall flavor complexity rankings. Overall, flavor complexity was correlated with KI, malt protein (negative), and β-glucosidase (negative), while sweetness intensity was correlated with limit dextrinase and pH. HS-SPME GC-MS analysis focused only on compounds that were significantly different between varieties (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05). Overall, 107 compounds were identified with significantly different levels between the varietal worts. The resultant PCA plots (overall, aldehydes, alcohols, esters, organic acids, terpenes, ketones) supported the sensory assessment, with Maris Otter and the Australian samples clustering in different PCA sectors compared to the Chinese malted Canadian/Chinese samples. These findings provide a basis for key compound identifications that influence malt flavor through the brewing process. The results have the potential to assist barley breeders in selecting optimized germplasm for future variety development and can assist maltsters and brewers to consistently target desired flavors for finished beers and potentially whisk(e)y. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156 .\",\"PeriodicalId\":17225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要啤酒风味主要受麦芽焙烧和啤酒配方中酵母/啤酒花的选择的影响。虽然大麦麦芽是大多数啤酒的主要原料,但直到最近,品种在风味差异方面一直被很大程度上忽视。在这项研究中,来自澳大利亚和国际(英国、加拿大、中国)多个产区的11种麦芽样品在实验室规模下(65°C)浸泡捣碎,以生产未煮沸的麦芽汁,以研究感官评估和顶空- spme气相色谱-质谱(HS-SPME GC-MS)观察到的风味特征之间的差异。感官评价确定了麦汁风味与对照遗产样品Maris Otter/Schooner的差异,具有最高的整体风味复杂性和可接受性。中国/加拿大麦芽样品的总体风味复杂性排名最低。总体而言,风味复杂性与KI、麦芽蛋白(负)和β-葡萄糖苷酶(负)相关,甜味强度与极限糊精酶和ph相关。HS-SPME GC-MS分析只关注品种间差异显著的化合物(方差分析,P≤0.05)。共鉴定出107种化合物,其含量在不同品种麦汁中存在显著差异。所得的PCA图(总体上,醛、醇、酯、有机酸、萜烯、酮)支持感官评估,与中国的加拿大/中国麦芽样品相比,Maris Otter和澳大利亚样品聚类在不同的PCA部门。这些发现为通过酿造过程确定影响麦芽风味的关键化合物提供了基础。这些结果有可能帮助大麦育种者为未来的品种开发选择优化的种质,并可以帮助酿酒师和酿酒商始终如一地为成品啤酒和潜在的搅拌(e)y提供所需的风味。本文的补充数据可在https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156上在线获得。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Influence of Malt Variety and Origin on Wort Flavor
Abstract Beer flavor is primarily impacted by malt kilning and the choice of yeast/hops in the beer recipe. Although barley malt is the material backbone of most beers, variety has until recently been largely overlooked with respect to flavor differences. In this study, 11 malt variety samples from multiple Australian and international (UK, Canada, China) growing regions were infusion mashed (65 °C) at laboratory scale to produce unboiled wort to investigate differences between the flavor profiles observed with sensory assessment and headspace-SPME gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME GC-MS). Sensory evaluation identified wort flavor differences with the control heritage samples, Maris Otter/Schooner, having the highest overall flavor complexity and acceptability. The Chinese malted Chinese/Canadian samples had the lowest overall flavor complexity rankings. Overall, flavor complexity was correlated with KI, malt protein (negative), and β-glucosidase (negative), while sweetness intensity was correlated with limit dextrinase and pH. HS-SPME GC-MS analysis focused only on compounds that were significantly different between varieties (ANOVA, P ≤ 0.05). Overall, 107 compounds were identified with significantly different levels between the varietal worts. The resultant PCA plots (overall, aldehydes, alcohols, esters, organic acids, terpenes, ketones) supported the sensory assessment, with Maris Otter and the Australian samples clustering in different PCA sectors compared to the Chinese malted Canadian/Chinese samples. These findings provide a basis for key compound identifications that influence malt flavor through the brewing process. The results have the potential to assist barley breeders in selecting optimized germplasm for future variety development and can assist maltsters and brewers to consistently target desired flavors for finished beers and potentially whisk(e)y. Supplemental data for this article is available online at https://doi.org/10.1080/03610470.2022.2041156 .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists
Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Society of Brewing Chemists publishes scientific papers, review articles, and technical reports pertaining to the chemistry, microbiology, and technology of brewing and distilling, as well as the analytical techniques used in the malting, brewing, and distilling industries.
期刊最新文献
New Proline-Specific Endoprotease for Improved Colloidal Beer Stability and Gluten Reduction Impact of Pasteurisation on Terpenes, Terpenoids, Aldehydes and Esters in Hoppy Ales on Ageing Characterization of Brettanomyces bruxellensis Phenolic Acid Decarboxylase Enzyme Expressed in Escherichia coli Identification of the Yeast Mannoprotein Gene HZY1 as a Key Genetic Determinant for Yeast-Derived Haze in Beer Rapid and Non-Destructive Determination of the Protein and Fat Contents in Wheat by Hyperspectral Imaging Combined with AdaBoost-SVR Modeling
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1