冲动和述情障碍能预测被收容的老年人的攻击性吗?

Q3 Social Sciences Analise Psicologica Pub Date : 2022-12-21 DOI:10.14417/ap.1946
H. Espírito-Santo, Luís André Abreu Paraíso Ferreira, Henrique Manuel Testa Vicente, Marina Isabel Vieira Antunes da Cunha, Ana Alexandra Gonçalves Grasina, F. Daniel, L. Lemos
{"title":"冲动和述情障碍能预测被收容的老年人的攻击性吗?","authors":"H. Espírito-Santo, Luís André Abreu Paraíso Ferreira, Henrique Manuel Testa Vicente, Marina Isabel Vieira Antunes da Cunha, Ana Alexandra Gonçalves Grasina, F. Daniel, L. Lemos","doi":"10.14417/ap.1946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Alexithymia and impulsivity are related and predict aggressiveness in younger adults, especially in forensic contexts. However, little is known about this relationship in older adults,especially in geriatric institutionalized settings, where aggressiveness presents a high prevalence. Thus, we aimed to analyze the impact of impulsivity and alexithymia in institutionalized older adults’ aggressiveness after examining the relationships between these variables. Relevant variables were controlled for in these relations.Methods: Ninety-seven institutionalized participants (60–94 years, 70.1% women, 59.8% nursing homes’ residents) were assessed with the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire-SF, TorontoAlexithymia Scale-20, and Barratt’s Impulsiveness Scale-15.Results: The self-reported level of aggressiveness was low in our sample. Aggressiveness correlated with and was predicted by alexithymia (R2=17.6%; β=0.24, p<.05) and impulsiveness (R2=17.6%; β=0.34, p<.01).Conclusion: Despite the low levels of aggressiveness (potentially explained by levels of medication, more supervision, and more frailty), our findings with institutionalized older adults demonstrate the relevance of alexithymia and impulsiveness for understanding aggressiveness in older adults, adding to previous studies with other types of populations. We provide directions for psychotherapeuticstrategies.","PeriodicalId":38440,"journal":{"name":"Analise Psicologica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do impulsivity and alexithymia predict aggressiveness in institutionalized older adults?\",\"authors\":\"H. Espírito-Santo, Luís André Abreu Paraíso Ferreira, Henrique Manuel Testa Vicente, Marina Isabel Vieira Antunes da Cunha, Ana Alexandra Gonçalves Grasina, F. Daniel, L. Lemos\",\"doi\":\"10.14417/ap.1946\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Alexithymia and impulsivity are related and predict aggressiveness in younger adults, especially in forensic contexts. However, little is known about this relationship in older adults,especially in geriatric institutionalized settings, where aggressiveness presents a high prevalence. Thus, we aimed to analyze the impact of impulsivity and alexithymia in institutionalized older adults’ aggressiveness after examining the relationships between these variables. Relevant variables were controlled for in these relations.Methods: Ninety-seven institutionalized participants (60–94 years, 70.1% women, 59.8% nursing homes’ residents) were assessed with the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire-SF, TorontoAlexithymia Scale-20, and Barratt’s Impulsiveness Scale-15.Results: The self-reported level of aggressiveness was low in our sample. Aggressiveness correlated with and was predicted by alexithymia (R2=17.6%; β=0.24, p<.05) and impulsiveness (R2=17.6%; β=0.34, p<.01).Conclusion: Despite the low levels of aggressiveness (potentially explained by levels of medication, more supervision, and more frailty), our findings with institutionalized older adults demonstrate the relevance of alexithymia and impulsiveness for understanding aggressiveness in older adults, adding to previous studies with other types of populations. We provide directions for psychotherapeuticstrategies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Analise Psicologica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Analise Psicologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1946\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analise Psicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.1946","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:述情障碍和冲动是相关的,可以预测年轻人的攻击性,尤其是在法医学背景下。然而,人们对老年人的这种关系知之甚少,尤其是在老年机构环境中,攻击性很普遍。因此,我们旨在通过研究这些变量之间的关系,分析冲动和述情障碍对制度化老年人攻击性的影响。在这些关系中控制了相关变量。方法:采用Buss-Perry攻击性问卷SF、TorontoAlexithymia量表-20和Barratt冲动量表-15对97名住院参与者(60-94岁,70.1%女性,59.8%疗养院居民)进行评估。结果:我们的样本中自我报告的攻击性水平较低。攻击性与述情障碍(R2=17.6%;β=0.24,p<.05)和冲动(R2=117.6%;β=0.034,p<.01)相关并可预测。结论:尽管攻击性水平较低(可能由药物水平、更多监督和更多虚弱来解释),我们对被收容的老年人的研究结果表明,述情障碍和冲动与理解老年人的攻击性有关,这增加了之前对其他类型人群的研究。我们为心理治疗策略提供指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Do impulsivity and alexithymia predict aggressiveness in institutionalized older adults?
Introduction: Alexithymia and impulsivity are related and predict aggressiveness in younger adults, especially in forensic contexts. However, little is known about this relationship in older adults,especially in geriatric institutionalized settings, where aggressiveness presents a high prevalence. Thus, we aimed to analyze the impact of impulsivity and alexithymia in institutionalized older adults’ aggressiveness after examining the relationships between these variables. Relevant variables were controlled for in these relations.Methods: Ninety-seven institutionalized participants (60–94 years, 70.1% women, 59.8% nursing homes’ residents) were assessed with the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire-SF, TorontoAlexithymia Scale-20, and Barratt’s Impulsiveness Scale-15.Results: The self-reported level of aggressiveness was low in our sample. Aggressiveness correlated with and was predicted by alexithymia (R2=17.6%; β=0.24, p<.05) and impulsiveness (R2=17.6%; β=0.34, p<.01).Conclusion: Despite the low levels of aggressiveness (potentially explained by levels of medication, more supervision, and more frailty), our findings with institutionalized older adults demonstrate the relevance of alexithymia and impulsiveness for understanding aggressiveness in older adults, adding to previous studies with other types of populations. We provide directions for psychotherapeuticstrategies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Analise Psicologica
Analise Psicologica Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
The role of child, maternal and household factors in the reported use of physical punishment practices by Portuguese mothers Behavioral descriptions pretested for racial stereotypicality and valence: Data from an American and a Portuguese sample The mediating role of burnout syndrome between regulatory focus/motivation and intention to leave in teachers Associations between secure base script knowledge in early childhood and perceived quality of attachment in middle childhood Dominant Affective Temperaments and its variance among people with depression, bipolar disorder, and a non-clinical sample: Validation of the Affective Temperament Questionnaire (ATQ)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1