谁进入政界?为什么?《英国议会的基本人类价值观》,詹姆斯·温伯格,布里斯托尔,布里斯托尔大学出版社,2020年。232便士,75英镑

V. Mete
{"title":"谁进入政界?为什么?《英国议会的基本人类价值观》,詹姆斯·温伯格,布里斯托尔,布里斯托尔大学出版社,2020年。232便士,75英镑","authors":"V. Mete","doi":"10.1017/ipo.2021.58","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contrary to the prevailing narrative that all politicians are nothing more than privileged idlers, the decision to enter politics today is a very challenging, dare I say almost heroic, one. In fact, career politicians are obliged to operate in an anti-political climate that generates constant popular disdain and hostility towards political representatives and those holding institutional office. This being the case, then it is natural to wonder who those attracted to a political career are. What individual qualities do they possess, and what reasons do they have for undertaking such an uncertain, tough, and at the end of the day somewhat unrewarding, career? Political science and political sociology scholars who have investigated this topic have tended to focus their attention, however, on the socio-demographic characteristics and the political and institutional features of political representatives. What has been developed to a far lesser extent, on the other hand, is the exploration of the individual motivations and underlying values of those individuals who decide to embark on a career in politics and who attain significant positions of power within the political sphere. Any such studies have generally been of a biographical (or on occasion auto-biographical) nature, or in any case of a qualitative character. There is a lack of more systematic studies conducted using quantitative methods. In his work Who enters politics and why? Basic human values in the UK parliament, James Weinberg has tried to fill this gap. The most original aspect of Weinberg’s work, and one that I personally consider appreciable, is his contribution to political science and political sociology from a different perspective, that of political psychology. There are basically three research questions that the author tries to answer in this work, namely:","PeriodicalId":43368,"journal":{"name":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Enters Politics and Why? Basic Human Values in the UK Parliament James Weinberg, Bristol, Bristol University Press, 2020. 232 p. £ 75.00\",\"authors\":\"V. Mete\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ipo.2021.58\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Contrary to the prevailing narrative that all politicians are nothing more than privileged idlers, the decision to enter politics today is a very challenging, dare I say almost heroic, one. In fact, career politicians are obliged to operate in an anti-political climate that generates constant popular disdain and hostility towards political representatives and those holding institutional office. This being the case, then it is natural to wonder who those attracted to a political career are. What individual qualities do they possess, and what reasons do they have for undertaking such an uncertain, tough, and at the end of the day somewhat unrewarding, career? Political science and political sociology scholars who have investigated this topic have tended to focus their attention, however, on the socio-demographic characteristics and the political and institutional features of political representatives. What has been developed to a far lesser extent, on the other hand, is the exploration of the individual motivations and underlying values of those individuals who decide to embark on a career in politics and who attain significant positions of power within the political sphere. Any such studies have generally been of a biographical (or on occasion auto-biographical) nature, or in any case of a qualitative character. There is a lack of more systematic studies conducted using quantitative methods. In his work Who enters politics and why? Basic human values in the UK parliament, James Weinberg has tried to fill this gap. The most original aspect of Weinberg’s work, and one that I personally consider appreciable, is his contribution to political science and political sociology from a different perspective, that of political psychology. There are basically three research questions that the author tries to answer in this work, namely:\",\"PeriodicalId\":43368,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.58\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Italian Political Science Review-Rivista Italiana di Scienza Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ipo.2021.58","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

人们普遍认为,所有的政治家都不过是享有特权的游手好闲者,与这种说法相反,如今进入政界的决定是一个非常具有挑战性的决定,我敢说,这几乎是一个英勇的决定。事实上,职业政治家不得不在一种反政治的气氛中工作,这种气氛不断地引起公众对政治代表和那些担任机构职务的人的蔑视和敌意。既然如此,那么人们自然会想知道那些被政治生涯吸引的人是谁。他们拥有什么样的个人品质?他们从事这样一份不确定、艰难、最终有些毫无回报的职业的原因是什么?然而,研究这一主题的政治科学和政治社会学学者倾向于将注意力集中在政治代表的社会人口特征和政治和制度特征上。另一方面,在较小程度上发展起来的是对那些决定走上政治生涯并在政治领域获得重要权力职位的个人的动机和潜在价值的探索。任何这样的研究通常都是传记性的(或者偶尔是自传式的),或者在任何情况下都是定性的。目前还缺乏使用定量方法进行的更系统的研究。在他的著作中,谁进入政界,为什么?在英国议会的基本人类价值观中,詹姆斯·温伯格试图填补这一空白。温伯格作品中最具原创性的方面,也是我个人认为值得欣赏的方面,是他从政治心理学的另一个角度对政治科学和政治社会学的贡献。在这项工作中,作者试图回答的研究问题基本上有三个,即:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Who Enters Politics and Why? Basic Human Values in the UK Parliament James Weinberg, Bristol, Bristol University Press, 2020. 232 p. £ 75.00
Contrary to the prevailing narrative that all politicians are nothing more than privileged idlers, the decision to enter politics today is a very challenging, dare I say almost heroic, one. In fact, career politicians are obliged to operate in an anti-political climate that generates constant popular disdain and hostility towards political representatives and those holding institutional office. This being the case, then it is natural to wonder who those attracted to a political career are. What individual qualities do they possess, and what reasons do they have for undertaking such an uncertain, tough, and at the end of the day somewhat unrewarding, career? Political science and political sociology scholars who have investigated this topic have tended to focus their attention, however, on the socio-demographic characteristics and the political and institutional features of political representatives. What has been developed to a far lesser extent, on the other hand, is the exploration of the individual motivations and underlying values of those individuals who decide to embark on a career in politics and who attain significant positions of power within the political sphere. Any such studies have generally been of a biographical (or on occasion auto-biographical) nature, or in any case of a qualitative character. There is a lack of more systematic studies conducted using quantitative methods. In his work Who enters politics and why? Basic human values in the UK parliament, James Weinberg has tried to fill this gap. The most original aspect of Weinberg’s work, and one that I personally consider appreciable, is his contribution to political science and political sociology from a different perspective, that of political psychology. There are basically three research questions that the author tries to answer in this work, namely:
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Economic voting goes local: evidence from the Italian regions Did the citizenship income scheme do it? The supposed electoral consequence of a flagship policy IPO volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Front matter IPO volume 53 issue 3 Cover and Back matter Precarious work and challenger parties: how precarity influenced vote choice in the 2018 Italian election
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1