经济政策不确定性对加密货币市场的不对称影响:来自NARDL方法的证据

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Economic Asymmetries Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00298
Simran, Anil Kumar Sharma
{"title":"经济政策不确定性对加密货币市场的不对称影响:来自NARDL方法的证据","authors":"Simran,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The study examines the relationship between cryptocurrency market and </span>economic policy uncertainty (EPU) by concentrating on the top five cryptocurrencies assessed by market capitalization. We investigate long and short-run effects of global EPU on the returns of </span>Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Binance coin and Ripple, along with ascertaining asymmetries, through the NARDL (Non-Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag) model, for the period ranging from September 2017 to August 2022. In the long run, except for Tether, all other cryptocurrencies are negatively affected by EPU, challenging the safe hedge properties of cryptocurrencies. However, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance coin and Ripple display positive relations with growing EPU in short run, reflecting their safe haven attributes over a shorter horizon. Additionally, these cryptocurrencies exhibit asymmetries in the short run. Further, we analyse the effect of US, Chinese and Indian EPU on bitcoin returns to understand the effect of EPU shocks of advanced and emerging economies. US EPU has long-run negative effects on bitcoin market, whereas Indian and Chinese EPU have no significant impact in long term. Moreover, our analysis also establishes the detrimental impact of the Indian government's crypto tax policy on bitcoin. The study has relevance for current and potential investors of the cryptocurrency market apart from the policymakers and regulatory bodies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38259,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article e00298"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on cryptocurrency market: Evidence from NARDL approach\",\"authors\":\"Simran,&nbsp;Anil Kumar Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jeca.2023.e00298\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span><span>The study examines the relationship between cryptocurrency market and </span>economic policy uncertainty (EPU) by concentrating on the top five cryptocurrencies assessed by market capitalization. We investigate long and short-run effects of global EPU on the returns of </span>Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Binance coin and Ripple, along with ascertaining asymmetries, through the NARDL (Non-Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag) model, for the period ranging from September 2017 to August 2022. In the long run, except for Tether, all other cryptocurrencies are negatively affected by EPU, challenging the safe hedge properties of cryptocurrencies. However, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance coin and Ripple display positive relations with growing EPU in short run, reflecting their safe haven attributes over a shorter horizon. Additionally, these cryptocurrencies exhibit asymmetries in the short run. Further, we analyse the effect of US, Chinese and Indian EPU on bitcoin returns to understand the effect of EPU shocks of advanced and emerging economies. US EPU has long-run negative effects on bitcoin market, whereas Indian and Chinese EPU have no significant impact in long term. Moreover, our analysis also establishes the detrimental impact of the Indian government's crypto tax policy on bitcoin. The study has relevance for current and potential investors of the cryptocurrency market apart from the policymakers and regulatory bodies.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38259,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"volume\":\"27 \",\"pages\":\"Article e00298\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Economic Asymmetries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Asymmetries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1703494923000105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

该研究通过关注按市值评估的前五种加密货币,研究了加密货币市场与经济政策不确定性(EPU)之间的关系。我们在2017年9月至2022年8月期间,通过NARDL(非线性自回归分布式滞后)模型,研究了全球EPU对比特币、以太坊、Tether、币安币和瑞波币回报的长期和短期影响,并确定了不对称性。从长远来看,除Tether外,所有其他加密货币都受到EPU的负面影响,挑战了加密货币的安全对冲属性。然而,比特币、以太坊、币安币和瑞波币在短期内与EPU的增长呈正相关,反映了它们在较短时间内的避险属性。此外,这些加密货币在短期内表现出不对称性。此外,我们分析了美国、中国和印度EPU对比特币回报的影响,以了解发达经济体和新兴经济体EPU冲击的影响。美国EPU对比特币市场有长期的负面影响,而印度和中国EPU对比特币市场的长期影响不显著。此外,我们的分析还确定了印度政府的加密货币税收政策对比特币的不利影响。除了政策制定者和监管机构之外,该研究还与加密货币市场的当前和潜在投资者相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Asymmetric impact of economic policy uncertainty on cryptocurrency market: Evidence from NARDL approach

The study examines the relationship between cryptocurrency market and economic policy uncertainty (EPU) by concentrating on the top five cryptocurrencies assessed by market capitalization. We investigate long and short-run effects of global EPU on the returns of Bitcoin, Ethereum, Tether, Binance coin and Ripple, along with ascertaining asymmetries, through the NARDL (Non-Linear Autoregressive Distributed Lag) model, for the period ranging from September 2017 to August 2022. In the long run, except for Tether, all other cryptocurrencies are negatively affected by EPU, challenging the safe hedge properties of cryptocurrencies. However, Bitcoin, Ethereum, Binance coin and Ripple display positive relations with growing EPU in short run, reflecting their safe haven attributes over a shorter horizon. Additionally, these cryptocurrencies exhibit asymmetries in the short run. Further, we analyse the effect of US, Chinese and Indian EPU on bitcoin returns to understand the effect of EPU shocks of advanced and emerging economies. US EPU has long-run negative effects on bitcoin market, whereas Indian and Chinese EPU have no significant impact in long term. Moreover, our analysis also establishes the detrimental impact of the Indian government's crypto tax policy on bitcoin. The study has relevance for current and potential investors of the cryptocurrency market apart from the policymakers and regulatory bodies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Economic Asymmetries
Journal of Economic Asymmetries Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
50 days
期刊最新文献
From debt arithmetic to fiscal sustainability and fiscal rules: Taking stock and policy lessons Editorial Board Asymmetric distance and business cycles (ΑDBC): A new understanding of distance in international trade models through the example of Iran's trade corridors The asymmetric impact of leisure externalities on economic growth Investigating the asymmetric effects of financial development on trade performance in Africa: Can digitalization, transport services, and regulatory quality drive the vision 2063?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1