michael kolmasi:民族认同与日本修正主义

IF 0.4 Q3 Social Sciences Mezinarodni Vztahy Pub Date : 2021-06-01 DOI:10.32422/MV-CJIR.1777
Jakub Harasta
{"title":"michael kolmasi:民族认同与日本修正主义","authors":"Jakub Harasta","doi":"10.32422/MV-CJIR.1777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the course of the twentieth century, Japan has experienced a radical shift in its self-perception. After World War II, Japan embraced a peaceful and anti-militarist identity, which was based on its war-prohibiting Constitution and the foreign policy of the Yoshida doctrine. For most of the twentieth century, this identity was unusually stable. In the last couple of decades, however, Japan’s self-perception and foreign policy seem to have changed. Tokyo has conducted a number of foreign policy actions as well as symbolic internal gestures that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago and that symbolize a new and more confident Japan. Japanese politicians – including Prime Minister Abe Shinzō – have adopted a new discourse depicting pacifism as a hindrance, rather than asset, to Japan’s foreign policy. Does that mean that “Japan is back”? In order to better understand the dynamics of contemporary Japan, Kolmaš joins up the dots between national identity theory and Japanese revisionism. The book shows that while political elites and a portion of the Japanese public call for re-articulation of Japan’s peaceful identity, there are still societal and institutional forces that prevent this change from entirely materializing.","PeriodicalId":39183,"journal":{"name":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Michal Kolmaš: National Identity and Japanese Revisionism\",\"authors\":\"Jakub Harasta\",\"doi\":\"10.32422/MV-CJIR.1777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Over the course of the twentieth century, Japan has experienced a radical shift in its self-perception. After World War II, Japan embraced a peaceful and anti-militarist identity, which was based on its war-prohibiting Constitution and the foreign policy of the Yoshida doctrine. For most of the twentieth century, this identity was unusually stable. In the last couple of decades, however, Japan’s self-perception and foreign policy seem to have changed. Tokyo has conducted a number of foreign policy actions as well as symbolic internal gestures that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago and that symbolize a new and more confident Japan. Japanese politicians – including Prime Minister Abe Shinzō – have adopted a new discourse depicting pacifism as a hindrance, rather than asset, to Japan’s foreign policy. Does that mean that “Japan is back”? In order to better understand the dynamics of contemporary Japan, Kolmaš joins up the dots between national identity theory and Japanese revisionism. The book shows that while political elites and a portion of the Japanese public call for re-articulation of Japan’s peaceful identity, there are still societal and institutional forces that prevent this change from entirely materializing.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mezinarodni Vztahy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32422/MV-CJIR.1777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mezinarodni Vztahy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32422/MV-CJIR.1777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在二十世纪的过程中,日本经历了自我认知的根本转变。第二次世界大战后,日本以其禁止战争的宪法和吉田主义的外交政策为基础,信奉和平和反军国主义的身份。在二十世纪的大部分时间里,这种身份异常稳定。然而,在过去的几十年里,日本的自我认知和外交政策似乎发生了变化。东京采取了一系列外交政策行动以及象征性的内部姿态,这在几十年前是不可想象的,象征着一个新的、更加自信的日本。包括首相安倍晋三在内的日本政界人士采用了一种新的话语,将和平主义描述为日本外交政策的障碍,而不是资产。这是否意味着“日本回来了”?为了更好地理解当代日本的动态,Kolmaš将民族认同理论与日本修正主义联系起来。这本书表明,尽管政治精英和部分日本公众呼吁重新阐明日本的和平身份,但仍有社会和制度力量阻止这一变化完全实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Michal Kolmaš: National Identity and Japanese Revisionism
Over the course of the twentieth century, Japan has experienced a radical shift in its self-perception. After World War II, Japan embraced a peaceful and anti-militarist identity, which was based on its war-prohibiting Constitution and the foreign policy of the Yoshida doctrine. For most of the twentieth century, this identity was unusually stable. In the last couple of decades, however, Japan’s self-perception and foreign policy seem to have changed. Tokyo has conducted a number of foreign policy actions as well as symbolic internal gestures that would have been unthinkable a few decades ago and that symbolize a new and more confident Japan. Japanese politicians – including Prime Minister Abe Shinzō – have adopted a new discourse depicting pacifism as a hindrance, rather than asset, to Japan’s foreign policy. Does that mean that “Japan is back”? In order to better understand the dynamics of contemporary Japan, Kolmaš joins up the dots between national identity theory and Japanese revisionism. The book shows that while political elites and a portion of the Japanese public call for re-articulation of Japan’s peaceful identity, there are still societal and institutional forces that prevent this change from entirely materializing.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Mezinarodni Vztahy
Mezinarodni Vztahy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Proměny přístupu československé diplomacie k arabsko-izraelskému konfliktu v letech 1948–1967 Jan Hornát – Lucie Kýrová ed.: America First: Příčiny a kontext volebního vítězství Donalda Trumpa Blanka Knotková-Čapková, Aleš Karmazin a kol. Asijské hierarchie v postkoloniálním kontextu. Politické, sociální a kulturní dimenze. Ivan Krastev: Už je zítra? Aneb jak pandemie mění Evropu Přechod k multipolárnímu měnovému uspořádání? Trendy v měnové koncentraci a internacionalizaci dolaru, eura a renminbi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1