使用实时超声评估母猪断奶当天和发情期间卵泡数量的变化。

R. Knox, J. Taibl, M. Altmyer, S. Breen, D. Canaday, A. Visconti
{"title":"使用实时超声评估母猪断奶当天和发情期间卵泡数量的变化。","authors":"R. Knox, J. Taibl, M. Altmyer, S. Breen, D. Canaday, A. Visconti","doi":"10.1530/biosciprocs.18.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Follicle selection and maturation for determining ovulation rate in the pig appears to occur during much of the follicular phase and up to the time of ovulation. There is evidence to suggest that counts of follicles classified as ovulatory-sized at onset of estrus may not reflect the final corpora lutea counts. Follicle size heterogeneity has been reported at estrus and may be related to increased embryonic asynchrony and mortality (Hunter et al. 1989). It is not dear which follicles ovulate at estrus but reports indicate follicles > 4 mm are LH responsive (Dufour & Mariana 1993; Lucy et al. 2001). Counts and size measures for ovulatory follicles may differ by the follicle size classification system and in response to whether follicles were assessed by physical or ultrasound measurement (Soede et al. 1998; Knox et al. 2002; Bracken et al. 2006). We hypothesized that the numbers of follicles classified as ovulatory at estrus may not reflect expected ovulation rate or litter size. We performed two experiments to characterize the changes in follicle populations from onset of estrus (Experiment 1) and from time of weaning to ovulation (Experiment 2). In experiment 1, our objectives were to measure proportions of weaned sows having large, medium and small follicles on the two days before ovulation. A total of 21 sows that had expressed estrus and ovulated between day 2 and 3 and which had real-time ultrasound digital video recordings for both the left and right ovaries on the first (period 1) and second day (period 2) of estrus were included in this study. The images of the ovaries were obtained transrectally using an Aloka 500V ultrasound with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer. The images were digitally recorded and follicles individually counted and measured using a digital display system that was calibrated to the measures of the ultrasound. The follicles were classified as small (S, <3.5 mm), Medium 1 (M1, 3.5-4.99 mm), Medium 2 (M2, 5.0-6.49 mm), Large 1 (L1, 6.5-7.99 mm), Large 2 (L2, 8.0-9.49 mm), and Large 3 (L3, 9.5-12.0 mm). Data were analyzed using the GLM procedures of SAS for the main effects of sow and period (day 1 and 2 of estrus). The response measures included the proportions of sows having the specified size class, numbers of follicles in class, and the size of the follicles. Period did not affect the percentage (22%), number (<3 follicles), or size of small follicles (3.1 mm). Period during estrus also did not affect the percentage of sows with Mt follicles (90%), or their size (4.4 mm), but numbers were reduced (P< 0.05) in period 2 (6.5 vs. 4.5). Period did not affect the percentage of sows with (100%) or numbers (14.1 follicles) of M2, but size was increased (P< 0.05) in period 2 (5.8 vs. 5.9 mm). Period did not affect the percentage of sows having L1 (100%), but numbers (7.8 vs. 9.1, P—0.01) and size (7.2 vs. 7.3, P<0.05) were both increased in period 2. Period tended (P<0.10) to increase the percentage of sows having L2 in period 2 compared to period 1 (37 vs. 63%) but there was no affect on numbers (2.2) or size of these follicles (8.6 mm). There was no effect of period on the proportion of sows having L3 (140/0),or their number (1.7), or their size (10.8 mm). In assessing the total number of large follicles (all those > 6.49 mm), there were more (P—0.01) large follicles in period","PeriodicalId":87420,"journal":{"name":"Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement","volume":"66 1","pages":"199-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of follicle population changes in sows from day of weaning and during estrus using real-time ultrasound.\",\"authors\":\"R. Knox, J. Taibl, M. Altmyer, S. Breen, D. Canaday, A. Visconti\",\"doi\":\"10.1530/biosciprocs.18.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Follicle selection and maturation for determining ovulation rate in the pig appears to occur during much of the follicular phase and up to the time of ovulation. There is evidence to suggest that counts of follicles classified as ovulatory-sized at onset of estrus may not reflect the final corpora lutea counts. Follicle size heterogeneity has been reported at estrus and may be related to increased embryonic asynchrony and mortality (Hunter et al. 1989). It is not dear which follicles ovulate at estrus but reports indicate follicles > 4 mm are LH responsive (Dufour & Mariana 1993; Lucy et al. 2001). Counts and size measures for ovulatory follicles may differ by the follicle size classification system and in response to whether follicles were assessed by physical or ultrasound measurement (Soede et al. 1998; Knox et al. 2002; Bracken et al. 2006). We hypothesized that the numbers of follicles classified as ovulatory at estrus may not reflect expected ovulation rate or litter size. We performed two experiments to characterize the changes in follicle populations from onset of estrus (Experiment 1) and from time of weaning to ovulation (Experiment 2). In experiment 1, our objectives were to measure proportions of weaned sows having large, medium and small follicles on the two days before ovulation. A total of 21 sows that had expressed estrus and ovulated between day 2 and 3 and which had real-time ultrasound digital video recordings for both the left and right ovaries on the first (period 1) and second day (period 2) of estrus were included in this study. The images of the ovaries were obtained transrectally using an Aloka 500V ultrasound with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer. The images were digitally recorded and follicles individually counted and measured using a digital display system that was calibrated to the measures of the ultrasound. The follicles were classified as small (S, <3.5 mm), Medium 1 (M1, 3.5-4.99 mm), Medium 2 (M2, 5.0-6.49 mm), Large 1 (L1, 6.5-7.99 mm), Large 2 (L2, 8.0-9.49 mm), and Large 3 (L3, 9.5-12.0 mm). Data were analyzed using the GLM procedures of SAS for the main effects of sow and period (day 1 and 2 of estrus). The response measures included the proportions of sows having the specified size class, numbers of follicles in class, and the size of the follicles. Period did not affect the percentage (22%), number (<3 follicles), or size of small follicles (3.1 mm). Period during estrus also did not affect the percentage of sows with Mt follicles (90%), or their size (4.4 mm), but numbers were reduced (P< 0.05) in period 2 (6.5 vs. 4.5). Period did not affect the percentage of sows with (100%) or numbers (14.1 follicles) of M2, but size was increased (P< 0.05) in period 2 (5.8 vs. 5.9 mm). Period did not affect the percentage of sows having L1 (100%), but numbers (7.8 vs. 9.1, P—0.01) and size (7.2 vs. 7.3, P<0.05) were both increased in period 2. Period tended (P<0.10) to increase the percentage of sows having L2 in period 2 compared to period 1 (37 vs. 63%) but there was no affect on numbers (2.2) or size of these follicles (8.6 mm). There was no effect of period on the proportion of sows having L3 (140/0),or their number (1.7), or their size (10.8 mm). In assessing the total number of large follicles (all those > 6.49 mm), there were more (P—0.01) large follicles in period\",\"PeriodicalId\":87420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"199-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.18.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society of Reproduction and Fertility supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/biosciprocs.18.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

决定猪排卵率的卵泡选择和成熟似乎发生在卵泡期的大部分时间,直到排卵期。有证据表明,在发情期开始时被归类为排卵大小的卵泡数量可能无法反映最终的黄体数量。据报道,发情期卵泡大小的异质性可能与胚胎异步性和死亡率的增加有关(Hunter等人,1989)。目前尚不清楚哪些卵泡在发情期排卵,但有报道表明,>4mm的卵泡对LH有反应(Dufour&Mariana 1993;Lucy等人2001)。排卵卵泡的计数和大小测量可能因卵泡大小分类系统以及是否通过物理或超声测量评估卵泡而有所不同(Soede等人,1998;Knox等人,2002年;Bracken等人,2006年)。我们假设,在发情期被归类为排卵卵泡的数量可能不能反映预期的排卵率或产仔数。我们进行了两个实验来表征从发情开始(实验1)和从断奶到排卵(实验2)卵泡数量的变化。在实验1中,我们的目标是测量断奶母猪在排卵前两天具有大卵泡、中卵泡和小卵泡的比例。本研究共包括21头在第2天至第3天发情并排卵的母猪,它们在发情的第一天(第1期)和第二天(第2期)对左右卵巢都进行了实时超声数字视频记录。使用Aloka 500V超声波和7.5MHz线性换能器经直肠获得卵巢图像。对图像进行数字记录,并使用根据超声波测量值校准的数字显示系统对卵泡进行单独计数和测量。卵泡分为小卵泡(S,6.49mm)和大卵泡(P-0.01)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of follicle population changes in sows from day of weaning and during estrus using real-time ultrasound.
Follicle selection and maturation for determining ovulation rate in the pig appears to occur during much of the follicular phase and up to the time of ovulation. There is evidence to suggest that counts of follicles classified as ovulatory-sized at onset of estrus may not reflect the final corpora lutea counts. Follicle size heterogeneity has been reported at estrus and may be related to increased embryonic asynchrony and mortality (Hunter et al. 1989). It is not dear which follicles ovulate at estrus but reports indicate follicles > 4 mm are LH responsive (Dufour & Mariana 1993; Lucy et al. 2001). Counts and size measures for ovulatory follicles may differ by the follicle size classification system and in response to whether follicles were assessed by physical or ultrasound measurement (Soede et al. 1998; Knox et al. 2002; Bracken et al. 2006). We hypothesized that the numbers of follicles classified as ovulatory at estrus may not reflect expected ovulation rate or litter size. We performed two experiments to characterize the changes in follicle populations from onset of estrus (Experiment 1) and from time of weaning to ovulation (Experiment 2). In experiment 1, our objectives were to measure proportions of weaned sows having large, medium and small follicles on the two days before ovulation. A total of 21 sows that had expressed estrus and ovulated between day 2 and 3 and which had real-time ultrasound digital video recordings for both the left and right ovaries on the first (period 1) and second day (period 2) of estrus were included in this study. The images of the ovaries were obtained transrectally using an Aloka 500V ultrasound with a 7.5 MHz linear transducer. The images were digitally recorded and follicles individually counted and measured using a digital display system that was calibrated to the measures of the ultrasound. The follicles were classified as small (S, <3.5 mm), Medium 1 (M1, 3.5-4.99 mm), Medium 2 (M2, 5.0-6.49 mm), Large 1 (L1, 6.5-7.99 mm), Large 2 (L2, 8.0-9.49 mm), and Large 3 (L3, 9.5-12.0 mm). Data were analyzed using the GLM procedures of SAS for the main effects of sow and period (day 1 and 2 of estrus). The response measures included the proportions of sows having the specified size class, numbers of follicles in class, and the size of the follicles. Period did not affect the percentage (22%), number (<3 follicles), or size of small follicles (3.1 mm). Period during estrus also did not affect the percentage of sows with Mt follicles (90%), or their size (4.4 mm), but numbers were reduced (P< 0.05) in period 2 (6.5 vs. 4.5). Period did not affect the percentage of sows with (100%) or numbers (14.1 follicles) of M2, but size was increased (P< 0.05) in period 2 (5.8 vs. 5.9 mm). Period did not affect the percentage of sows having L1 (100%), but numbers (7.8 vs. 9.1, P—0.01) and size (7.2 vs. 7.3, P<0.05) were both increased in period 2. Period tended (P<0.10) to increase the percentage of sows having L2 in period 2 compared to period 1 (37 vs. 63%) but there was no affect on numbers (2.2) or size of these follicles (8.6 mm). There was no effect of period on the proportion of sows having L3 (140/0),or their number (1.7), or their size (10.8 mm). In assessing the total number of large follicles (all those > 6.49 mm), there were more (P—0.01) large follicles in period
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Development of the pig placenta. Conceptus-uterus interactions in pigs: endometrial gene expression in response to estrogens and interferons from conceptuses. Temporal candidate gene expression patterns in the sow placenta during early gestation and the effect of maternal L-arginine supplementation. Genetic selection for lifetime reproductive performance. Global protein profiling of porcine cumulus cells in response to native oocyte secreted factors in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1