{"title":"评估咨询委员会在会计项目中的有效性","authors":"Hui Xu , Bobby E. Waldrup , Alfred Michenzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (<span>Ahmed, 2019</span>, <span>Johnson, 2014</span>, <span>Norman and Bagranoff, 2019</span>, <span>Siegel et al., 2010</span>, <span>Stevenson et al., 2016</span>). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of advisory boards in accounting programs\",\"authors\":\"Hui Xu , Bobby E. Waldrup , Alfred Michenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (<span>Ahmed, 2019</span>, <span>Johnson, 2014</span>, <span>Norman and Bagranoff, 2019</span>, <span>Siegel et al., 2010</span>, <span>Stevenson et al., 2016</span>). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the effectiveness of advisory boards in accounting programs
Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (Ahmed, 2019, Johnson, 2014, Norman and Bagranoff, 2019, Siegel et al., 2010, Stevenson et al., 2016). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.