评估咨询委员会在会计项目中的有效性

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2023-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100847
Hui Xu , Bobby E. Waldrup , Alfred Michenzi
{"title":"评估咨询委员会在会计项目中的有效性","authors":"Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Bobby E. Waldrup ,&nbsp;Alfred Michenzi","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (<span>Ahmed, 2019</span>, <span>Johnson, 2014</span>, <span>Norman and Bagranoff, 2019</span>, <span>Siegel et al., 2010</span>, <span>Stevenson et al., 2016</span>). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the effectiveness of advisory boards in accounting programs\",\"authors\":\"Hui Xu ,&nbsp;Bobby E. Waldrup ,&nbsp;Alfred Michenzi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2023.100847\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (<span>Ahmed, 2019</span>, <span>Johnson, 2014</span>, <span>Norman and Bagranoff, 2019</span>, <span>Siegel et al., 2010</span>, <span>Stevenson et al., 2016</span>). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Accounting Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575123000192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多会计专业人士认为,雇主期望和课堂学习之间存在差距,建立一个成功的会计顾问委员会可以弥合这一差距(Ahmed, 2019, Johnson, 2014, Norman和Bagranoff, 2019, Siegel等人,2010,Stevenson等人,2016)。本研究旨在调查会计顾问委员会在会计部门的实践,检查他们所从事的最有效的协助部门的活动。作者还探讨了阻碍会计程序建立自己的会计咨询委员会的障碍。为了实现这一目标,在美国学校的会计系主任中进行了一项调查。调查结果显示,49.5%的受访者表示,他们有一个专门为会计部门服务的会计顾问委员会,而14.6%的受访者表示,他们与商学院的其他专业共享该顾问委员会。总体而言,64.1%的受访者表示有顾问委员会。此外,研究发现,会计顾问委员会从事的最有效的活动(按有效性排序)是学生职业发展、战略规划、筹款以及与部门和机构支持者的宣传。最后,该研究强调了一些学校没有独立会计咨询委员会的原因。本研究为会计部门寻求建立或提高其咨询委员会的有效性提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the effectiveness of advisory boards in accounting programs

Many accounting professionals believe that there exists a gap between employer expectations and classroom learning, and that establishing a successful accounting advisory board can bridge this gap (Ahmed, 2019, Johnson, 2014, Norman and Bagranoff, 2019, Siegel et al., 2010, Stevenson et al., 2016). This study aims to investigate the practice of accounting advisory boards in accounting departments, examining the activities they engage in that are most effective in assisting the departments. The authors also explore the barriers that prevent accounting programs from setting up their own accounting advisory boards. To achieve this, a survey was conducted among the accounting department chairs of schools in the United States. The results of the survey revealed that 49.5 % of the respondents indicated that they have an accounting advisory board dedicated exclusively to their accounting department, while 14.6 % of them shared the advisory board with other programs in their business schools. Overall, 64.1 % of the respondents reported having an advisory board. In addition, the study found that the most effective activities engaged by the accounting advisory boards, in order of effectiveness, are student career development, strategic planning, fundraising, and advocacy with departmental and institutional constituencies. Finally, the study highlights the reasons why some schools do not have an independent accounting advisory board. This study provides valuable insights for accounting departments seeking to establish or enhance the effectiveness of their advisory board.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1