{"title":"中老年人腹部脂肪分布与糖尿病的关系","authors":"Xuefeng Ni, Wenbing Mou, L. Jiao, K. Yu","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.03.007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nA analyze the relation between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus in elderly person aged 51-100. \n \n \nMethods \nAccording to the abdominal CT scan in 2015 to 2016 of 162 patients in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, the volume and distribution of their abdominal fat were measured to analyze the relationship between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus. \n \n \nResults \nPeople aged 51-75, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have less abdominal visceral fat[(63.61±24.95)mm3vs.( 70.39±31.33)mm3t=-1.229, P=0.22], tend to have more abdominal subcutaneous fat[(89.03±32.94)mm3vs. (83.18±43.25)mm3, t=1.070, P=0.43), but both are not significant difference, total abdominal fat is similar between the two group[(152.64±46.84)mm3vs. (151.84±61.32)mm3 , t=0.076, P=0.94], abdominal visceral fat percentage is significantly lower[(41.8±10.9)% vs. (46.9±10.9)%, t=-2.346, P=0.02]. People aged 76-100, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have more abdominal visceral fat[(68.29±39.58)mm3vs. (51.56±25.89)mm3), abdominal subcutaneous fat[(84.65±41.30)mm3vs. (75.29±42.04)mm3], total abdominal fat[(152.96±69.92)mm3vs. (126.86±62.13)mm3], abdominal visceral fat percentage[(43.7±12)% vs. (41.1±11.8)%], all of them are not significant (t=1.885, 0.839, 1.479, 0.810, respectively; P=0.07, 0.40, 0.15, 0.42, respectively). \n \n \nConclusions \nIn people aged 51-75, those who had increased ratio of abdominal visceral fat to total abdominal fat were more prone to diabetes or fasting hyperglycemia. In people aged 76-100, no significant correlation was detected between abdominal fat and disorder of glucose metabolism. \n \n \nKey words: \nDiabetes mellitus, type 2; Obesity; Subcutaneous fat; Viscecal fat","PeriodicalId":9877,"journal":{"name":"中华临床营养杂志","volume":"26 1","pages":"176-180"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between abdominal fat distribution and diabetes in middle-aged and old people\",\"authors\":\"Xuefeng Ni, Wenbing Mou, L. Jiao, K. Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.03.007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nA analyze the relation between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus in elderly person aged 51-100. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nAccording to the abdominal CT scan in 2015 to 2016 of 162 patients in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, the volume and distribution of their abdominal fat were measured to analyze the relationship between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nPeople aged 51-75, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have less abdominal visceral fat[(63.61±24.95)mm3vs.( 70.39±31.33)mm3t=-1.229, P=0.22], tend to have more abdominal subcutaneous fat[(89.03±32.94)mm3vs. (83.18±43.25)mm3, t=1.070, P=0.43), but both are not significant difference, total abdominal fat is similar between the two group[(152.64±46.84)mm3vs. (151.84±61.32)mm3 , t=0.076, P=0.94], abdominal visceral fat percentage is significantly lower[(41.8±10.9)% vs. (46.9±10.9)%, t=-2.346, P=0.02]. People aged 76-100, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have more abdominal visceral fat[(68.29±39.58)mm3vs. (51.56±25.89)mm3), abdominal subcutaneous fat[(84.65±41.30)mm3vs. (75.29±42.04)mm3], total abdominal fat[(152.96±69.92)mm3vs. (126.86±62.13)mm3], abdominal visceral fat percentage[(43.7±12)% vs. (41.1±11.8)%], all of them are not significant (t=1.885, 0.839, 1.479, 0.810, respectively; P=0.07, 0.40, 0.15, 0.42, respectively). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nIn people aged 51-75, those who had increased ratio of abdominal visceral fat to total abdominal fat were more prone to diabetes or fasting hyperglycemia. In people aged 76-100, no significant correlation was detected between abdominal fat and disorder of glucose metabolism. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nDiabetes mellitus, type 2; Obesity; Subcutaneous fat; Viscecal fat\",\"PeriodicalId\":9877,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"176-180\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"中华临床营养杂志\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.03.007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Nursing\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中华临床营养杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1674-635X.2018.03.007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
Relationship between abdominal fat distribution and diabetes in middle-aged and old people
Objective
A analyze the relation between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus in elderly person aged 51-100.
Methods
According to the abdominal CT scan in 2015 to 2016 of 162 patients in Peking Union Medical College Hospital, the volume and distribution of their abdominal fat were measured to analyze the relationship between abdominal fat and diabetes mellitus.
Results
People aged 51-75, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have less abdominal visceral fat[(63.61±24.95)mm3vs.( 70.39±31.33)mm3t=-1.229, P=0.22], tend to have more abdominal subcutaneous fat[(89.03±32.94)mm3vs. (83.18±43.25)mm3, t=1.070, P=0.43), but both are not significant difference, total abdominal fat is similar between the two group[(152.64±46.84)mm3vs. (151.84±61.32)mm3 , t=0.076, P=0.94], abdominal visceral fat percentage is significantly lower[(41.8±10.9)% vs. (46.9±10.9)%, t=-2.346, P=0.02]. People aged 76-100, no abnormal glucose metabolism group compare with diabetes or fast hyperglycemia group, tend to have more abdominal visceral fat[(68.29±39.58)mm3vs. (51.56±25.89)mm3), abdominal subcutaneous fat[(84.65±41.30)mm3vs. (75.29±42.04)mm3], total abdominal fat[(152.96±69.92)mm3vs. (126.86±62.13)mm3], abdominal visceral fat percentage[(43.7±12)% vs. (41.1±11.8)%], all of them are not significant (t=1.885, 0.839, 1.479, 0.810, respectively; P=0.07, 0.40, 0.15, 0.42, respectively).
Conclusions
In people aged 51-75, those who had increased ratio of abdominal visceral fat to total abdominal fat were more prone to diabetes or fasting hyperglycemia. In people aged 76-100, no significant correlation was detected between abdominal fat and disorder of glucose metabolism.
Key words:
Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Obesity; Subcutaneous fat; Viscecal fat
期刊介绍:
The Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition was founded in 1993. It is the first professional academic journal (bimonthly) in my country co-sponsored by the Chinese Medical Association and the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences to disseminate information on clinical nutrition support, nutrient metabolism, the impact of nutrition support on outcomes and "cost-effectiveness", as well as translational medicine and nutrition research. It is also a professional journal of the Chinese Medical Association's Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition Branch.
The purpose of the Chinese Journal of Clinical Nutrition is to promote the rapid dissemination of knowledge on nutrient metabolism and the rational application of parenteral and enteral nutrition, focusing on the combination of multidisciplinary and multi-regional field investigations and clinical research. It mainly reports on nutritional risk screening related to the indications of parenteral and enteral nutrition support, "cost-effectiveness" research on nutritional drugs, consensus on clinical nutrition, guidelines, expert reviews, randomized controlled studies, cohort studies, glycoprotein and other nutrient metabolism research, systematic evaluation of clinical research, evidence-based case reports, special reviews, case reports and clinical experience exchanges, etc., and has a special column on new technologies related to the field of clinical nutrition and their clinical applications.