从拉各斯市区杂货店随机抽取的含酒精洗手液对新冠肺炎时期当地部分细菌菌株的抗菌效果评价

C. Enwuru, Oluwatoyin O. Awoderu, E. E., C. C, E. Afocha, Lawal G Raman, Peter L. Gogwan, U. Igbasi, R. Audu
{"title":"从拉各斯市区杂货店随机抽取的含酒精洗手液对新冠肺炎时期当地部分细菌菌株的抗菌效果评价","authors":"C. Enwuru, Oluwatoyin O. Awoderu, E. E., C. C, E. Afocha, Lawal G Raman, Peter L. Gogwan, U. Igbasi, R. Audu","doi":"10.33425/2639-9458.1122","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Health experts promote the use of alcohol based hand rubs to contain the spread of microbes. The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has brought a worsening public health challenge that re-enacted the importance of hand hygiene globally. Objective: This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of locally made alcohol-based hand rubes sourced from grocery shops within Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. Methods: We conducted a laboratory based in vitro experiment, using 20 randomly sourced hand sanitizers against standard Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and three locally characterized Multi-drug-Resistant bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus (NIMR/NTCC/GP056), Klebsiella pneumonia (NIMR/NTCC/GN065) and Proteus stutzin - (NIMR/NTCC/ GN029). Reference standard, 60 % isopropanol was used as positive control. Test suspension method as per European standard PrEN12054 was employed. The Colony Forming Unit/mL (CFU/mL) at base line and after each contact time (15, 30 & 45 seconds) with samples was recorded. The Logarithmic reduction factor (RF) and percent reduction were computed and expressed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of the 20 solutions tested (10 sprays and 10 gels), 11 (55%) had standard efficacy of 5-Log10 reduction factor (6.7- 6.8) recommended at 15 seconds exposure time on the 4 bacteria. Out of such 7 (64%) were spray solution (L1, L3, L5, L10, L11, L12 & L16), while 4 (36%) were gel solutions (L9, L15, L18 & L20). Another 2 (10%) had relative time based efficacy at between 30 to 45 seconds exposure (L2 spray and L14 gel). Seven (35%) (L7 & L17 spray; L4, L6, L8, L13 & L19 gel solutions) failed the test. Escherichia coli and Proteus stutzin were more susceptible to the samples tested and produced higher RF. Conclusion: About 45 % of the hand sanitizers had poor efficacy and this is quite high, especially in this era of pandemic. This report underscores the need for production policy review by the regulatory body. It is imperative to enforce quality management regime, particularly, internal and external production quality control. Periodic batch efficacy validation is necessary to ensure precision. Poor quality products must be actionable. We recommend this experiment be scaled up to national level and to cover major microbial pathogens.","PeriodicalId":93597,"journal":{"name":"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy of Randomly Selected Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizers Sourced from Grocery Shops within Lagos Metropolis on Some Local Bacterial Strains in COVID-19 Era\",\"authors\":\"C. Enwuru, Oluwatoyin O. Awoderu, E. E., C. C, E. Afocha, Lawal G Raman, Peter L. Gogwan, U. Igbasi, R. Audu\",\"doi\":\"10.33425/2639-9458.1122\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Health experts promote the use of alcohol based hand rubs to contain the spread of microbes. The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has brought a worsening public health challenge that re-enacted the importance of hand hygiene globally. Objective: This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of locally made alcohol-based hand rubes sourced from grocery shops within Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. Methods: We conducted a laboratory based in vitro experiment, using 20 randomly sourced hand sanitizers against standard Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and three locally characterized Multi-drug-Resistant bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus (NIMR/NTCC/GP056), Klebsiella pneumonia (NIMR/NTCC/GN065) and Proteus stutzin - (NIMR/NTCC/ GN029). Reference standard, 60 % isopropanol was used as positive control. Test suspension method as per European standard PrEN12054 was employed. The Colony Forming Unit/mL (CFU/mL) at base line and after each contact time (15, 30 & 45 seconds) with samples was recorded. The Logarithmic reduction factor (RF) and percent reduction were computed and expressed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of the 20 solutions tested (10 sprays and 10 gels), 11 (55%) had standard efficacy of 5-Log10 reduction factor (6.7- 6.8) recommended at 15 seconds exposure time on the 4 bacteria. Out of such 7 (64%) were spray solution (L1, L3, L5, L10, L11, L12 & L16), while 4 (36%) were gel solutions (L9, L15, L18 & L20). Another 2 (10%) had relative time based efficacy at between 30 to 45 seconds exposure (L2 spray and L14 gel). Seven (35%) (L7 & L17 spray; L4, L6, L8, L13 & L19 gel solutions) failed the test. Escherichia coli and Proteus stutzin were more susceptible to the samples tested and produced higher RF. Conclusion: About 45 % of the hand sanitizers had poor efficacy and this is quite high, especially in this era of pandemic. This report underscores the need for production policy review by the regulatory body. It is imperative to enforce quality management regime, particularly, internal and external production quality control. Periodic batch efficacy validation is necessary to ensure precision. Poor quality products must be actionable. We recommend this experiment be scaled up to national level and to cover major microbial pathogens.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9458.1122\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microbiology & infectious diseases (Wilmington, Del.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33425/2639-9458.1122","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:卫生专家提倡使用含酒精的洗手液来控制微生物的传播。新型SARS-CoV-2病毒的出现带来了日益严峻的公共卫生挑战,重新凸显了全球手部卫生的重要性。目的:本研究评估了从尼日利亚拉各斯大都市的杂货店采购的当地制造的酒精基手巾的抗菌功效。方法:采用实验室为基础的体外实验,随机抽取20种抗标准大肠埃希菌(ATCC 25922)和3种当地特征的多重耐药菌株(金黄色葡萄球菌(NIMR/NTCC/GP056)、肺炎克雷伯菌(NIMR/NTCC/GN065)和斯图zin - Proteus (NIMR/NTCC/ GN029)的洗手液。标准品,60%异丙醇为阳性对照。试验采用欧洲标准PrEN12054的悬架法。记录基线和每次接触时间(15,30和45秒)后的菌落形成单位/mL (CFU/mL)。对数缩减因子(RF)和百分比缩减计算和表示使用描述性统计。结果:在20种溶液(10种喷雾和10种凝胶)中,11种(55%)在15秒暴露时间下对4种细菌具有5-Log10降低因子(6.7- 6.8)的标准功效。其中,喷雾溶液(L1、L3、L5、L10、L11、L12、L16) 7个(64%),凝胶溶液(L9、L15、L18、L20) 4个(36%)。另外2种(10%)在暴露30至45秒之间具有相对基于时间的功效(L2喷雾和L14凝胶)。七(35%)(L7 & L17喷雾;L4, L6, L8, L13和L19凝胶溶液)未通过测试。大肠杆菌和变形杆菌对所测样品更敏感,产生更高的RF。结论:45%的洗手液效果不佳,这一比例相当高,特别是在这个大流行的时代。该报告强调了监管机构对生产政策进行审查的必要性。加强质量管理制度,特别是内部和外部的生产质量控制势在必行。定期的批效验证是保证精度的必要条件。劣质产品必须采取行动。我们建议将这一实验扩大到国家一级,并涵盖主要的微生物病原体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of Antibacterial Efficacy of Randomly Selected Alcohol Based Hand Sanitizers Sourced from Grocery Shops within Lagos Metropolis on Some Local Bacterial Strains in COVID-19 Era
Background: Health experts promote the use of alcohol based hand rubs to contain the spread of microbes. The emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 virus has brought a worsening public health challenge that re-enacted the importance of hand hygiene globally. Objective: This study evaluated the antimicrobial efficacy of locally made alcohol-based hand rubes sourced from grocery shops within Lagos metropolis, Nigeria. Methods: We conducted a laboratory based in vitro experiment, using 20 randomly sourced hand sanitizers against standard Escherichia coli (ATCC 25922) and three locally characterized Multi-drug-Resistant bacterial strains (Staphylococcus aureus (NIMR/NTCC/GP056), Klebsiella pneumonia (NIMR/NTCC/GN065) and Proteus stutzin - (NIMR/NTCC/ GN029). Reference standard, 60 % isopropanol was used as positive control. Test suspension method as per European standard PrEN12054 was employed. The Colony Forming Unit/mL (CFU/mL) at base line and after each contact time (15, 30 & 45 seconds) with samples was recorded. The Logarithmic reduction factor (RF) and percent reduction were computed and expressed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of the 20 solutions tested (10 sprays and 10 gels), 11 (55%) had standard efficacy of 5-Log10 reduction factor (6.7- 6.8) recommended at 15 seconds exposure time on the 4 bacteria. Out of such 7 (64%) were spray solution (L1, L3, L5, L10, L11, L12 & L16), while 4 (36%) were gel solutions (L9, L15, L18 & L20). Another 2 (10%) had relative time based efficacy at between 30 to 45 seconds exposure (L2 spray and L14 gel). Seven (35%) (L7 & L17 spray; L4, L6, L8, L13 & L19 gel solutions) failed the test. Escherichia coli and Proteus stutzin were more susceptible to the samples tested and produced higher RF. Conclusion: About 45 % of the hand sanitizers had poor efficacy and this is quite high, especially in this era of pandemic. This report underscores the need for production policy review by the regulatory body. It is imperative to enforce quality management regime, particularly, internal and external production quality control. Periodic batch efficacy validation is necessary to ensure precision. Poor quality products must be actionable. We recommend this experiment be scaled up to national level and to cover major microbial pathogens.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Why So Many Negative Coproculture? About 2329 Corocultures Carried Out at the Charles De Gaulle Pediatric Hospital Center in Hospitalized Children Aged 0 To 5 Years Old Impact of Vaccination on COVID-19 case fatality in the United Kingdom Congenital Trypanosomiasis in an 11-Year-Old Girl at the Brazzaville University Hospital Effects of Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Palmitate (EC16) on In Vitro Norovirus Infection. Novel COVID Model to Help Early Diagnosis of COVID-19 and Prediction of Disease Severity: A Multicenter Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1