- œWe只有当别人自由时,你才自由 -”:从哲学和神学的角度对自由的思考

IF 0.7 0 PHILOSOPHY Phronimon Pub Date : 2019-03-19 DOI:10.25159/2413-3086/1963
N. Botha
{"title":"<s:2> - œWe只有当别人自由时,你才自由<e:2> -”:从哲学和神学的角度对自由的思考","authors":"N. Botha","doi":"10.25159/2413-3086/1963","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It requires no measure of razor-sharp analysis or prophecy to observe that, 25 years into a hard-won democracy, millions of South Africans have not yet obtained the freedom that would enable them to collaborate in creating a qualitative, new society. Part of the problem seems to be the dichotomisation of a number of unavoidable questions resulting from freedom. In this article, some of these issues—like the notion of the born free, liberation, corruption, truth and freedom as a gift—are brought into discourse with the matter of freedom. Particular reference is made to the philosopher, Hanna Arendt, as well as the apostle Paul, in their respective interpretations of freedom. The article concludes with some broad strokes on the implications for South Africa of Paul’s understanding of freedom. The basic thesis of the article is that, unless freedom is brought into a critical conversation with philosophical and theological interpretations of freedom, it will not deliver to millions of South Africans trapped in inequality, unemployment and poverty.","PeriodicalId":42048,"journal":{"name":"Phronimon","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“We Are Free only when Others Are Free”: Reflections on Freedom from Philosophical and Theological Perspectives\",\"authors\":\"N. Botha\",\"doi\":\"10.25159/2413-3086/1963\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It requires no measure of razor-sharp analysis or prophecy to observe that, 25 years into a hard-won democracy, millions of South Africans have not yet obtained the freedom that would enable them to collaborate in creating a qualitative, new society. Part of the problem seems to be the dichotomisation of a number of unavoidable questions resulting from freedom. In this article, some of these issues—like the notion of the born free, liberation, corruption, truth and freedom as a gift—are brought into discourse with the matter of freedom. Particular reference is made to the philosopher, Hanna Arendt, as well as the apostle Paul, in their respective interpretations of freedom. The article concludes with some broad strokes on the implications for South Africa of Paul’s understanding of freedom. The basic thesis of the article is that, unless freedom is brought into a critical conversation with philosophical and theological interpretations of freedom, it will not deliver to millions of South Africans trapped in inequality, unemployment and poverty.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phronimon\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phronimon\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/1963\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phronimon","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25159/2413-3086/1963","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

不难看出,在实行来之不易的民主制度25年后,数百万南非人仍未获得使他们能够合作创造一个有质量的新社会的自由。问题的一部分似乎是由于自由而产生的一些不可避免的问题的二分法。在这篇文章中,其中的一些问题——比如生而自由、解放、腐败、真理和自由是一种礼物的概念——将与自由的问题进行讨论。特别提到了哲学家汉娜·阿伦特和使徒保罗,在他们各自对自由的解释中。文章最后对保罗对自由的理解对南非的影响作了一些概括。这篇文章的基本论点是,除非将自由与对自由的哲学和神学解释进行批判性的对话,否则它不会带给数百万陷入不平等、失业和贫困的南非人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“We Are Free only when Others Are Free”: Reflections on Freedom from Philosophical and Theological Perspectives
It requires no measure of razor-sharp analysis or prophecy to observe that, 25 years into a hard-won democracy, millions of South Africans have not yet obtained the freedom that would enable them to collaborate in creating a qualitative, new society. Part of the problem seems to be the dichotomisation of a number of unavoidable questions resulting from freedom. In this article, some of these issues—like the notion of the born free, liberation, corruption, truth and freedom as a gift—are brought into discourse with the matter of freedom. Particular reference is made to the philosopher, Hanna Arendt, as well as the apostle Paul, in their respective interpretations of freedom. The article concludes with some broad strokes on the implications for South Africa of Paul’s understanding of freedom. The basic thesis of the article is that, unless freedom is brought into a critical conversation with philosophical and theological interpretations of freedom, it will not deliver to millions of South Africans trapped in inequality, unemployment and poverty.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phronimon
Phronimon PHILOSOPHY-
自引率
25.00%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Environmental Racism in Nigeria’s Niger Delta: An Ethical Appraisal Copyright Law and the Ruse of Culture: ‘Traditional Cultural Expressions and Expressions of Folklore’ as a Conception of Racial Difference Reproducing the Conqueror’s South Africa: An Azanian Critique of the Constitutionalist Endorsement of Assisted Reproductive and Reprogenetic Technologies The Evolution of Constitutionalism in Conqueror South Africa. Was Jan Smuts Right? An Ubu-ntu Response Who Must Lead Decoloniality: A Practical Theological Interrogation on the Possible Qualification to Lead Decolonisation: A South African Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1