伊维菌素治疗轻中度新冠肺炎患者的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/1995-7645.364007
M. Ersi, Alireza Malektojari, Sara Ghazizadeh, Elham Brahimi, Soheil Hassanipour, M. Fathalipour, Mehdi Hassaniazad
{"title":"伊维菌素治疗轻中度新冠肺炎患者的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验","authors":"M. Ersi, Alireza Malektojari, Sara Ghazizadeh, Elham Brahimi, Soheil Hassanipour, M. Fathalipour, Mehdi Hassaniazad","doi":"10.4103/1995-7645.364007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19. Methods: This study was a single-center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with a 2-arm parallel-group design on 68 patients with COVID-19. According to the 1:1 ratio between the study groups (ivermectin group and standard treatment group), patients were randomly admitted to each intervention arm. Results: The mean age of the participants in the ivermectin group was (48.37±13.32) years. Eighteen of them were males (54.5%) and the participants in the control group had a mean age of (46.28±14.47) years, with nineteen of them being males (59.4%). As a primary outcome, after 5 days of randomization, there was no significant difference between the ivermectin group and the control group in the length of stay in the hospital (P=0.168). ICU admission (P=0.764), length of stay in ICU (P=0.622), in-hospital mortality (P=0.427), adverse drug reactions, and changes in the mean difference of laboratory data had not any significant difference between the two groups (except for urea change). In addition, the radiologic findings of the two groups of patients were not significantly different. Linear regression analysis showed that for every 10 years increase of age, 0.6 day of hospitalization duration was increased. There was no statistically significant association between other variables and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Among adult hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, there was no significant relationship between the administration of ivermectin single dose in a five-day course and clinical improvement, and mortality of the participants.","PeriodicalId":8559,"journal":{"name":"Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":"3 - 8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"M. Ersi, Alireza Malektojari, Sara Ghazizadeh, Elham Brahimi, Soheil Hassanipour, M. Fathalipour, Mehdi Hassaniazad\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/1995-7645.364007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19. Methods: This study was a single-center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with a 2-arm parallel-group design on 68 patients with COVID-19. According to the 1:1 ratio between the study groups (ivermectin group and standard treatment group), patients were randomly admitted to each intervention arm. Results: The mean age of the participants in the ivermectin group was (48.37±13.32) years. Eighteen of them were males (54.5%) and the participants in the control group had a mean age of (46.28±14.47) years, with nineteen of them being males (59.4%). As a primary outcome, after 5 days of randomization, there was no significant difference between the ivermectin group and the control group in the length of stay in the hospital (P=0.168). ICU admission (P=0.764), length of stay in ICU (P=0.622), in-hospital mortality (P=0.427), adverse drug reactions, and changes in the mean difference of laboratory data had not any significant difference between the two groups (except for urea change). In addition, the radiologic findings of the two groups of patients were not significantly different. Linear regression analysis showed that for every 10 years increase of age, 0.6 day of hospitalization duration was increased. There was no statistically significant association between other variables and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Among adult hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, there was no significant relationship between the administration of ivermectin single dose in a five-day course and clinical improvement, and mortality of the participants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"3 - 8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.364007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/1995-7645.364007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价伊维菌素治疗轻中度新冠肺炎患者的有效性和安全性。方法:本研究是一项单中心、随机、开放标签、对照试验,采用2臂平行组设计,对68例新冠肺炎患者进行研究。根据研究组(伊维菌素组和标准治疗组)之间的1:1比例,将患者随机纳入每个干预组。结果:伊维菌素组受试者的平均年龄为(48.37±13.32)岁。其中18人为男性(54.5%),对照组参与者的平均年龄为(46.28±14.47)岁,其中19人为男性(59.4%)。作为主要结果,经过5天的随机分组,伊维菌素组和对照组在住院时间上没有显著差异(P=0.168),ICU住院时间(P=0.622)、住院死亡率(P=0.427)、药物不良反应和实验室数据平均差异的变化在两组之间没有任何显著差异(尿素变化除外)。此外,两组患者的放射学检查结果没有显著差异。线性回归分析表明,年龄每增加10年,住院时间增加0.6天。其他变量与临床结果之间没有统计学意义的相关性。结论:在成年中重度新冠肺炎住院患者中,为期五天的单剂伊维菌素给药与患者的临床改善和死亡率之间没有显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19: A randomized controlled trial
Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ivermectin in patients with mild and moderate COVID-19. Methods: This study was a single-center, randomized, open-label, controlled trial with a 2-arm parallel-group design on 68 patients with COVID-19. According to the 1:1 ratio between the study groups (ivermectin group and standard treatment group), patients were randomly admitted to each intervention arm. Results: The mean age of the participants in the ivermectin group was (48.37±13.32) years. Eighteen of them were males (54.5%) and the participants in the control group had a mean age of (46.28±14.47) years, with nineteen of them being males (59.4%). As a primary outcome, after 5 days of randomization, there was no significant difference between the ivermectin group and the control group in the length of stay in the hospital (P=0.168). ICU admission (P=0.764), length of stay in ICU (P=0.622), in-hospital mortality (P=0.427), adverse drug reactions, and changes in the mean difference of laboratory data had not any significant difference between the two groups (except for urea change). In addition, the radiologic findings of the two groups of patients were not significantly different. Linear regression analysis showed that for every 10 years increase of age, 0.6 day of hospitalization duration was increased. There was no statistically significant association between other variables and clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Among adult hospitalized patients with moderate to severe COVID-19, there was no significant relationship between the administration of ivermectin single dose in a five-day course and clinical improvement, and mortality of the participants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine
Asian Pacific journal of tropical medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-TROPICAL MEDICINE
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.70%
发文量
1936
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine (ISSN 1995-7645 CODEN: APJTB6), a publication of Editorial office of Hainan Medical University,is a peer-reviewed print + online Monthly journal. The journal''s full text is available online at http://www.apjtm.org/. The journal allows free access (Open Access) to its contents and permits authors to self-archive final accepted version of the articles on any OAI-compliant institutional / subject-based repository. APJTM aims to provide an academic communicating platform for international physicians, medical scientists, allied health scientists and public health workers, especially those of the Asia-Pacific region and worldwide on tropical medicine, infectious diseases and public health, and to meet the growing challenges of understanding, preventing and controlling the dramatic global emergence and re-emergence of infectious diseases in the Asia-Pacific. The journal is proud to have an international and diverse editorial board that will assist and facilitate the publication of articles that reflect a global view on tropical medicine, infectious diseases and public health, as well as emphasizing our focus on supporting the needs of public health practitioners. The APJTM will allow us to seek opportunities to work with others who share our aim, and to enhance our work through partnership, and to uphold the standards of our profession and contribute to its advancement.
期刊最新文献
Revisiting HPV infection pattern among urban Indonesian women in general population and its implication on health burden: A cross-sectional analysis from Indonesian Noncommunicable Disease Research 2016 The alarming surge of HIV/AIDS in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan demands urgent attention Vaccine development for leptospirosis: A systematic review Resveratrol as an epigenetic therapy for flavivirus infection: A narrative review Developing an evaluation model to support evidence-based decision-making on provincial vaccination program of Zhejiang province
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1