早期劳工运动罢工暴力、媒体和厄普顿·辛克莱假说

IF 1.7 Q2 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR Journal of Labor and Society Pub Date : 2022-10-19 DOI:10.1163/24714607-bja10087
Larry W. Isaac, Jonathan S. Coley, H. Ingersoll
{"title":"早期劳工运动罢工暴力、媒体和厄普顿·辛克莱假说","authors":"Larry W. Isaac, Jonathan S. Coley, H. Ingersoll","doi":"10.1163/24714607-bja10087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n During the labor movement’s formative years, Upton Sinclair was among the most vehement critics of the press for, as he claimed, a wide variety of “capitalist corruptions.” The authors examine one of Sinclair’s central charges in his The Brass Check, the first major book-length criticism of the U.S. corporate press: When strikers are violent, they get reported on the wire services; when they are not violent, they are ignored by the wires and thus the papers. This press selection process serves to create in public consciousness a strong association between strikes and violence. Focusing on coverage by the New York Sun and New York Times for fourteen major strikes spanning the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, evidence suggests that Sinclair’s claim was, with some qualification, generally correct. The authors discuss implications of negative press as “soft repression” during the formative years of the labor movement and prior to journalism’s major moves at professionalization.","PeriodicalId":42634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Labor and Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Early Labor Movement Strike Violence, the Press, and the Upton Sinclair Hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Larry W. Isaac, Jonathan S. Coley, H. Ingersoll\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/24714607-bja10087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n During the labor movement’s formative years, Upton Sinclair was among the most vehement critics of the press for, as he claimed, a wide variety of “capitalist corruptions.” The authors examine one of Sinclair’s central charges in his The Brass Check, the first major book-length criticism of the U.S. corporate press: When strikers are violent, they get reported on the wire services; when they are not violent, they are ignored by the wires and thus the papers. This press selection process serves to create in public consciousness a strong association between strikes and violence. Focusing on coverage by the New York Sun and New York Times for fourteen major strikes spanning the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, evidence suggests that Sinclair’s claim was, with some qualification, generally correct. The authors discuss implications of negative press as “soft repression” during the formative years of the labor movement and prior to journalism’s major moves at professionalization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Labor and Society\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Labor and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Labor and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在劳工运动形成的几年里,厄普顿·辛克莱(Upton Sinclair)是对新闻界最激烈的批评者之一,正如他所声称的那样,他提出了各种各样的“资本主义腐败”。作者在他的《黄铜支票》(the Brass Check)中审视了辛克莱的核心指控之一,这是对美国企业新闻界的第一次长篇批评:当罢工者使用暴力时,他们会被报道到通讯社;当他们不暴力的时候,他们就会被电线和报纸忽视。这一新闻选择过程有助于在公众意识中建立罢工和暴力之间的强烈联系。根据《纽约太阳报》和《纽约时报》对镀金时代和进步时代14次重大罢工的报道,有证据表明辛克莱的说法在一定程度上是正确的。作者讨论了在劳工运动的形成时期和新闻业职业化的重大举措之前,负面新闻作为“软镇压”的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Early Labor Movement Strike Violence, the Press, and the Upton Sinclair Hypothesis
During the labor movement’s formative years, Upton Sinclair was among the most vehement critics of the press for, as he claimed, a wide variety of “capitalist corruptions.” The authors examine one of Sinclair’s central charges in his The Brass Check, the first major book-length criticism of the U.S. corporate press: When strikers are violent, they get reported on the wire services; when they are not violent, they are ignored by the wires and thus the papers. This press selection process serves to create in public consciousness a strong association between strikes and violence. Focusing on coverage by the New York Sun and New York Times for fourteen major strikes spanning the Gilded Age and Progressive Era, evidence suggests that Sinclair’s claim was, with some qualification, generally correct. The authors discuss implications of negative press as “soft repression” during the formative years of the labor movement and prior to journalism’s major moves at professionalization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Labor and Society
Journal of Labor and Society INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
You Won’t Break My Soul: Black Women’s Contemporary Anti-Work Philosophies and Post-Work Experiences Gramsci, Polanyi and the Labor Politics of Social Protection The Centrality of the Workplace and Class Consciousness in the US South: The New Orleans Community Studies Improving Labour Laws in Ghana: An Analysis of Collective Bargaining Agreements Panama: An Analysis Of Class Location And Income Distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1